164
submitted 10 months ago by andrewta@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 45 points 10 months ago

The problem is that the things they “disagree” about are sometimes basic scientific facts, like climate change, or beliefs which strongly affect people’s lives negatively, such as racism, anti-lgbt bigotry, or economic views like “it’s just fine to pay people such low wages they can barely afford to live and will never be able to buy a house”.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And why are these politics an issue in the workplace?

I'm 52 and have worked a wide variety of jobs. Nowhere I have been employed was it acceptable to talk politics, except on the down-low with people you knew well. If there was a political discussion where two people disagreed, they either agreed to disagree, or it was quickly dropped.

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

I'm the same age as you, so I've seen the same social and political changes as you have over the last 20 years or so. Some "politics" are just negative moral stances about other people. If your political/moral views make people feel excluded and you make sure we all know your views, whether through explicit political conversation or implicit comments, we are not going to "agree to disagree." We will be telling the shithead to STFU, and if they don't, we will be getting HR involved. We can't and won't tolerate intolerance in the workplace.

In my experience, in the 80s and 90s, intolerance was pretty commonplace, and racial and moral minorities mostly just had to suck it up. What's changed is that liberals have "woken up" to that long-standing intolerance, while conservatives want things to stay the same. Up until about 2016, the majority of these conservatives hid their intolerance. Little did we know that they were just seething inside. Then Trump made it okay to be vocally hateful again, and that seething mass of conservatives exploded into public discourse again.

I don't think Gen Z is incapable of disagreeing with their co-workers in a respectful way. I think they are seeing angry, usually older, conservatives raging about moral issues that they thought were already resolved. Or, they see boomers still denying climate change, which is a real slap in the face for the younger generation who will face the consequences long after those boomers are dead. It is very disconcerting and depressing for Gen Z, and as the father of a couple of Gen Z kids, I'm proud of them for taking a stand.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

Agreed with almost all that! Except the last bit...

they are seeing angry, usually older, conservatives raging about moral issues

Where, outside social media, is this happening? Worked all sorts of positions over 30+ years and the times I've heard politics in the workplace are memorable because they're so rare.

Maybe I'm out of touch, but I rarely saw it in the past, and even less so now that we've been so politically polarized. And I notice none of the younger folks are chiming in with their own anecdotes, just the assumption that Boomers are the badies, spouting bullshit in the workplace.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Millennial here. I hear a lot more anti woke, PC, LGBT, etc talk than I would like. Both the Bud Light and Target "controversies" I heard about at work because people were apparently enraged by it.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

“Cancel culture” forgot that in my comment above but it gets thrown around like the candy at Halloween

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm an older millennial, mid 80s birthday, and I hear at least one GenX or Boomer make jokes about how they 'can't make jokes anymore' or 'uh oh the woke police we'll get me if I say that' or 'everyone's so sensitive these days' or 'that's probably not politically correct' a week. I've had more than one boss in my life talk about 'welfare queens' and 'ObamaPhones' and another that outright denied climate change. One of my co-workers was recently talking about how 'slavery has been everywhere throughout human history, so why are the US so evil for it still?'. Had another one ask me if the neighborhood of the city I live in is safe now that we've 'defunded the police' which no we haven't.

I've encountered people talking politics everywhere I've ever worked in my 15-year career in tech over 4 different companies, 3 in the Fortune 500. It's not always from boomers, but it is always something along those same beats of either complaining about how things have changed, and they can't say whatever they want to whoever they want, some bullshit right wing talking point, or concern over non-existent crime.

[-] Sparky_@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I envy you. I work for a university. I started in 2017 and it took about 30 minutes for my conservative lab mate to start talking to my Mexican ass about how "we need to build the wall." That's just one of the many times this person went on racist rants, unprompted. Though to be fair they were not a boomer, so it's a problem that spans generations.

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

In my case, we had a very religious guy in the office. Elder Gen X, not quite a boomer. He was very open about being evangelical and morally conservative, which was perhaps irritating to some, but tolerable. But then Trump and COVID happened and he went off the deep end, spouting COVID conspiracy theories and talking about supporting Trump and the Bible and the end-times. We eventually had to fire him.

The problem since 2016 is that people don't have to be explicitly "talking politics" for their intolerant views to be known. Trump isn't really a "conservative" in any traditional sense. He is a crass hate machine, and that is his overwhelming brand. So, if you support him, you are pretty much advertising that you are intolerant. It isn't hard to see how that would be hostile to young people who have been raised to be tolerant above all else.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Because whether some people are allowed to exist is politics now, and gen z and others aren't going to quietly let bosses/coworkers banally brutalize people anymore without pushback.

The workplace is steeped in politics, like every other part of your life. The discussions dont have to be about politics day in day out, but somethings have to be addressed directly, work or not.

Basically, if youre workplace is fair and decent, then you likely wont hear anyhting about politics. if it's full of bigots/abuse, well, people arent putting up with it anymore.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I’m not really sure what the person in the article means. It says something about “lockdown-era students can’t hold down a heated discussion”… but why would they be having heated discussions? It also says

Miami University even organized a dinner with senior leaders in order to teach proper mealtime etiquette, such as how to engage in conversation on neutral topics.

which makes it sound like it’s older people who bring up inappropriate political topics in an inflammatory way.

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Because those aren’t politics. These are peoples lives. There’s no such thing as agreeing to disagree about if people get to have basic rights. What’s been labeled as political now is denying people the ability to live as they want, ironically taking away the freedom one side claims to love.

[-] ArtieShaw@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Like you, I've moved around the US quite a bit have have worked at a variety of companies. But I noticed that the article mentions Miami University, which is in southwestern Ohio. People around here have an odd idea of what constitutes rudeness or what should not be discussed at work.

They are ALL IN on politics.

Visitors to our work's Ohio location (from out of country or out of state) are completely freaked out by it. Locals have no idea that their behavior might be considered rude or inappropriate.

Long story short, I'm not even remotely surprised that a local school is trying to teach people manners.

[-] leftzero@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Because scientific facts, or social and economic issues (that definitely affect and belong in the workplace) are not “politics” regardless of how much you'd like to label them as such so you can shove them under the rug and forget about them, you retrograde fossilized lich, and because “agreeing to disagree” with assholes who hold harmful opinions only serves to empower them and enable them to keep causing harm.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Go ahead, pick fights at work. See how that works out for you. According to the story, it ain't working out.

My current company is a Seattle based software dev, about as liberal as it gets. You come talking politics and arguing with people, even though you're on the "right" side, and you're fucking fired. Bye.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
164 points (77.0% liked)

News

22470 readers
4693 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS