152
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
152 points (78.6% liked)
World News
39358 readers
3521 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Missing White Woman Syndrome
Damn it's actually a thing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndrome
I thought you were being sardonic
Never knew the word "sardonic" existed until today
Gosh, I remember people said Ahed Tamimi fit this category some years back.
The politics of being an oppressed class within a class of oppressors isn't new, and there are a lot of opportunities for white women to act in fucked up ways (eg Karens), and for people to treat white women in fucked up ways. She was probably chosen to be specifically humiliated and brutalized because of Missing White Woman Syndrome, and it's playing out as they expected - which will embolden them to do it again.
Attributing our concern to her whiteness racializes and politicizes her humiliation but it's still a disgusting humiliation and brutalization.
By citing the MWWS without context, the implication is that we should be ashamed for our concern, as though we only care because she's white - a statement that is, for me anyway, and I think for more and more people these days, false - but it's irrelevant - MWWS is a phenomenon, but she was a person. Her treatment was disgusting and trying to undermine legitimate shock and disgust is cruel.
While MWWS and the politics of white femininity are important (and specifically caused this woman's uniquely horrific treatment), it doesn't help to discuss them in the aftermath of specific horrors, and trying to shame people for feeling disgusted by disgusting behavior is, well, it's why you're being downvoted. The point of equality isn't to treat privileged people worse, it's to treat underprivileged people better.
People on this website are such pearl clutchers. Insert *Hannibal Buress Being Right" meme.
She was brutalized and humiliated specifically because of MWWS. To cite that phenomenon without context reads like they're trying to shame people for being disgusted by disgusting behavior. It's as if, because of the existence of MWWS, we shouldn't feel concern - when, the reality is that the reason MWWS is a problem isn't because people care too much about white women, it's because people care too little about non-white women.
A more useful invocation of the MWWS is when a non-white woman is brutalized and no one seems to care, not when it's a white woman and people do.
The point of equality isn't to treat privileged people worse, it's to treat underprivileged people better.
Could you explain why pointing out a instance of a real phenomena is pearl clutching?
Because she was the first hostage that I didn't have to search about. And big surprise it was a early twenties conventionally attractive white woman. I hesitate to say privileged, but it appears that she had some.
She was German, but 'non white ' Germans were celebrating her death in the streets while handing out free Baklava. I live in Berlin and been to Sonnenallee ( where mass protest pro Palestine where Geld ). Some white privileged German was arguing how they can celebrate her death while a not privileged person was saying: das war ne dreckige Juden Fotze. Which translates to 'she was just a dirty Jew cunt'. I was a witness myself
She looks pretty damn white to me.
Edit: I also am not going to believe you without proof.
Straight up exactly what I was thinking
Its a shame I'm getting downvoted but it's a known media phenomenon and I can think of nothing more disrespectful to others than to have the pretty woman, usually white and privileged, drive a news cycle.
People are conflating your observation with how you must actually feel. As if you're condoning the media spending time talking about a young attractive woman instead of all of the other victims.
I don't think that's it. Mentioning the Missing White Woman Syndrome in this context implies that we should not feel disgust or concern because we're only feeling that way because she's white.
The point of MWWS isn't that we should care less about white women, it's that we should care more about non-white women; it would be more apt trip being it up in the context of the brutalization and humiliation of a non white women about whom no one seems to give a shit.
As I've said in a few posts on this thread: the point of equality isn't to treat privileged people worse, it's to treat underprivileged people better.
It's a surprisingly common occurrence that I'm surprised more people don't pick up on.