418
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Shereen Wu says leading designer uploaded altered picture, amid fears AI could ‘turn back the clock’ on progress in the industry

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 98 points 10 months ago

From the title by itself, I was expecting a simple change to skin tone, which would have been bad enough. Reading the story and looking at the pic made me realize that things are much, much worse. What the FUCK.

[-] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago

You know what is the worst thing about this for me.

According to his post, he did not produce the show and did not know that Wu was not compensated for her time until he saw her TikTok.

Not only did they cheat her out of being the model, and replacing her with a terrible AI photo. They also didnt pay her for doing the actual show, until this blew up and the designer saw the tiktok.

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He also initially threatened legal action against her, for unclear reasons. Like, he's shared some racist Photoshop, gets called out for it, and his first response is to... Threaten to sue the model who simply made public comments about it?

Guy is a real piece of shit. He can walk back on stuff all he wants, but the first thing he did speaks volumes about what kinda person he is.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

This isn't saying she got paid after the TikTok -- it's saying the guy didn't know she wasn't paid, until he saw the TikTok. AFAIK she hasn't been paid at all.

[-] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

According to his post, he did not produce the show and did not know that Wu was not compensated for her time until he saw her TikTok. “After finding out through her videos that she wasn’t paid, I offered Shereen compensation for her time and talents,” Costello wrote.

It sounds like he at least offered to pay her, despite not being the one that was running the show and paying her.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

To be fair, Wu also states in the article that she wasn’t expecting to be paid in anything but “exposure.” But that i think is what makes this particularly egregious - she wasn’t even getting paid in that fake currency for the naive. Although the article says that many of the models are under a similar arrangement for the fashion week this occurred during, so maybe exposure still counts for something in the fashion and modeling industries.

[-] Zippit@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

Same. They literally changed her Asian features into that? And it's not like the changed face is prettier than her. Disgusting.

[-] famousringo@sh.itjust.works 21 points 10 months ago

They even padded up her shoulders. She got unironically balenciaga’d by the fashion industry.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Don't give them the free advertising, use the OG -

She got Joan Collinsed

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Supermodels are why I don't really buy the whole "the media decides what's attractive", because it's been trying to say that that's the peak of attractiveness all my life but I've never bought it.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

You aren't wrong. High end women models and women porn stars look vastly different. One looks like a 19 year skinny boys the other look like women.

I think when people say that they mean that girls with confidence issues see these runway models and think that is what it means to be attractive, not that suddenly men will be attracted to that.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Damn., those over.y pinched cheeks and giant lips do NOT improve anything

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

She done got Melania'd.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
418 points (93.7% liked)

News

22855 readers
5658 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS