541
submitted 11 months ago by HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 118 points 11 months ago

The presidential oath of office that Trump was required to recite during the swearing in ceremony:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

[-] radix@lemmy.world 93 points 11 months ago

It dOeSn'T sAy "sUpPoRt"!!1! ChEcKmAtE lIbS!!

(I feel dirty now)

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 73 points 11 months ago

That's literally the legal defence they are using.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

The “I’m not touching you” defense.

[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

See also the, "We'rE NoT A DeMoCrAcY" set.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The 2nd amendment says nothing about guns/firearms. It was written as arms. It specifically talks about a militia and being able to keep things. It also says that we have the right to obtain the arms of bears (bear arms). There is literally no precedent to allow anyone have a gun.

It’s pretty explicit in what they wanted.

/s

This is why trying to argue based on literal words, and not intent, is dumb.

[-] radix@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution defines the powers of Congress, including:

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

According to the words of the Constitution, Congress can't appropriate any money to the Air Force.

[-] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

"Raise your little armies everyone! First your left arm and then your right arm and then your bear arm! Now wave your armies!"

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

But didn't you see he had his fingers crossed? That means he doesn't have to do it!

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

They're trying to play semantic games and claim that supporting is not the same thing is preserving, protecting, and defending. It's a laughably bad argument and hopefully it gets struck down pretty much immediately.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Hmm, I've usually heard it pronounced half to, but I guess the 'correct' spelling is have to.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

What would "half to" even mean?

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

What does have to mean? Have is possessing something, have to doesn't make sense either.

[-] ArtieShaw@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

It means that it is required. Obligatory.

It's a modal verb. And I think it comes from the secondary meaning of have as "to undergo or experience" rather than to possess. Or maybe not.

in any case:

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/have-to

In my dialect, you're correct about one thing. It's pronounced nearly the same way as half. But that would make no sense.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Would 'I have something to do' (I posess an option of a thing to do) would be the same as 'I have to do something'? (I need to do a thing) I thought those were different words.

[-] ArtieShaw@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

The word order makes all the difference.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

"Preserve, protect, and defend, but not support. Checkmate liberals!!!"

  • Some Random Attorney Trump Dug Up From the Bottom Of The Barrel
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
541 points (98.0% liked)

News

23257 readers
3172 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS