519
submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If you're making 150k per year and "living paycheck to paycheck" you suck with money, full stop.

That's more than double median household income

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My combined household income is more than 150k per year and I have not changed my spending habits since I was in college.... caveat being I own a house but my mortgage may only be twice what I was paying in rent. Also I now have healthcare.

Still living paycheck to paycheck. I guess I'd be ok if I missed one or both my wife and I missed one. Though, my marriage would start to be in jeopardy after 2 or 3 I'd guess. Not that she would leave me because I'm not making enough but the added stress would quickly become unmanageable.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Same, except I have a functional TV now lol

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 25 points 8 months ago

If you are living in an area with a high cost of living, $150k won't feel like $150k.

From Bungalow, 10 Mist Expensive Cities in the US,

  1. San Francisco, CA The cost of living in San Francisco is the highest in the country. Jobs in the City by the Bay pay well, with average annual incomes of over $100,000. In 2019, the city had an unemployment rate as low as 1.8%. But a good chunk of each check goes toward the nation’s highest housing costs. As of January 2020, the average rent for an apartment in San Francisco was $3,700, and the median home purchase price was $1.35 million. Prices are sky-high because of limited housing stock and lack of new construction.

If you are making $100k and renting at the average rental price of $3,700, in one year the cost your housing is $44,400 which is almost 45% of your income. The goal is to spend 30% of your income on housing. If people with would be normally considered to have a good income are struggling then the poor are completely fucked.

There is a small group of people who are making money off this system and ain't us.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

San Francisco, CA The cost of living in San Francisco is the highest in the country. Jobs in the City by the Bay pay well, with average annual incomes of over $100,000

Now imagine one just doesn't choose to live in the literal most expensive place on the planet.

FWIW the only people benefiting from this shitty exclusionary zoning are the boomers who rigged the zoning so they stay rich forever. It's entirely a localized problem.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Ah, the classic, "Why don't they just move?"

Checkmate

[-] some_guy -1 points 8 months ago

Now imagine one just doesn’t choose to live in the literal most expensive place on the planet.

Because the jobs I want to work will relocate to the midwest to help me cover rent. /s

And before you tell me to take a less-fancy job, some of the problems a person might want to solve are far more interesting and rewarding than the kinds of "tech" jobs available in a place like Austin, TX. No comparison at all. People don't work hard to do things that don't interest them.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

It's so weird that you just pretend nothing exists away from a coast lol

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 25 points 8 months ago

This is out of touch. There is a huge number of factors that dictate what amount of money is enough to live a fulfilled live. A bachelor can live a fulfilled life on 30k a year and still save money, but a family of 5 can definitely be living paycheck to paycheck on 150k, especially if they live in an expensive area.

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

I think location definitely plays into this. 150k in some places is nothing.

[-] tigerhawkvok@startrek.website 12 points 8 months ago

I'm almost there.

I also live in the Bay Area. My rent is locally cheap but nationally very high. My wife has a chronic illness and an unrelated acute issue that recently required surgery. She can barely work. Until this most recent surgery I was keeping ahead, but expenses are up and income is down and that's not true anymore.

I have good health insurance but there's a lot more to medical costs than just doctors, and to partially manage her daily quality of life it's not weird to cook her three different dinners and she can only stomach one. This explodes our meal budget.

We're childfree but one of our dogs recently also got diagnosed with chronic illness. They are our kids, full stop.

Shit happens. Don't be a dick about it.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

You sound like the exception not the rule.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I think you'd be surprised how many people live in cities and have medical expenses. This dude doesn't even have kids.

[-] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Nope. If people having been living the exact same without changing many of their habits then it is absolutely fair that they would also be struggling paycheck to paycheck. They're effected just as the rest are. We need to focus on the jackass causing us to turn on eachother. We shouldn't be comparing ourselves because there are people who consider 30k/y as living lavish and think they also shouldn't be complaining.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If people having been living the exact same without changing many of their habits then it is absolutely fair that they would also be struggling paycheck to paycheck

If you can't play for the future you will be poor. I owe you no sympathy

You're one of the richest people on the planet, by default, and I think you should pay more in taxes and it should be on you to figure out your finances, because you're fucking rich and you just don't realize it.

The most wealthy places on earth should not be held up as the norm and most people should not live in those places. We should tax all of those people excessively and they should not have guaranteed wealth.

[-] JDubbleu@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago

Wholely agree. I live in the most expensive region in the US on $160k base salary. My total annual expenses (including vacations, wants, gifts) don't exceed $50k, and of that $20k is rent.

[-] Rediphile@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 months ago

Well yeah, but you probably make good choices which is arguably cheating.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I don't think that would be a winnable argument.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They use the median instead of mean here for a reason... Can you guess it?

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I think the point is, they are living paycheck to paycheck unless they choose to decrease the quality of living.

On one hand we can say these people are way better off than they deserve and laugh at their stupidity.

On the other hand, that's not a great sign for the economy. The "every day" kind of rich person isn't even that rich anymore. And lowering the ceiling pushes you into the floor.

If society were healthier and functioning, relative costs would be going down for everybody. But enshitification is the new big thing to earn another buck.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think the point is, they are living paycheck to paycheck unless they choose to decrease the quality of living.

People who actually live paycheck to paycheck don't have this option and this is ludicrously offensive to people who actually live this way.

On one hand we can say these people are way better off than they deserve and laugh at their stupidity.

It's not about laughing at their stupidity but about the situation itself being laughable.

The “every day” kind of rich person isn’t even that rich anymore. And lowering the ceiling pushes you into the floor.

I thought lowering these gaps was the intention of Progressivism. Is it not?

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think it's just one more side effect of "American exceptionalism" and the culture of individuality and "me me me me" here, that people don't even see "change your lifestyle" as an option.

They were told about the American dream or whatever, but they were sold a bill of goods, and now they can't even comprehend cutting back on expenses in any meaningful way.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Lowering the gap between 10th and 90th percentile is meaningless if the very top doesn't change too

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
519 points (96.6% liked)

News

22470 readers
4901 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS