884
Anon sends a file (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 year ago

I'm a xennial, and i think one of the key characteristics of my generation is that we grew up with tech becoming omnipresent, but it was also non user friendly tech.

We started having PCs young, but we really had to know how to build our systems, it was much less plug and play. We grew up with visual OSs, but configuring that shit was not intuitive at all. Or outright broken (looking at you Win ME). We had to troubleshoot, fix, learn, read and test just to get our tech working.

Younger generations grew up with tech omnipresent yes, but tech that mostly works intuitively - you barely ever have to really figure shit out, fix it or reconfigure it.

Just my 2 cents!

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, once we had invented proper tablets and smartphones, those things are so intuitive that I have seen videos of monkeys figuring out how to use them.

We got the sweet spot. Having to know how to program the VCR and cable boxes gave us a leg up on troubleshooting, and DOS just sealed the deal. Never thought I would be thankful for all those frustrating days.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Anybody else here remember being the kid that knew how to set up VCRs for their grandparents and parents? LOL

I learned how the cables worked so that I could get my NES to work on the TV. Sometimes you'd have to wire it through the VCR and so I learned how the VCR worked. Then I was a wizard to the old people

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

That is about the only animal testing I approve of.

Can't wait for companies to put "So easy to use, even a monkey could do it" sticker on their tablets.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 year ago

To add in to it, a lot of the experience during the formative years was with desktop computers. Consoles were there, but had far less capabilities. Handheld devices were generally more expensive compared to today and worse to use.

So you've got a case where young adults today have to work on a computer platform completely foreign to them while young adults 20 years ago usually had 5 - 10 years experience as a user on that platform.

[-] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a pretty accurate take to me.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

A lot of current users aren't ever exposed to the underlying tech. They only use a few applications. The ideal device for them is a tablet (or a ChromeBook). They know next to nothing about files, networks, most aspects of hardware (except the bling factor, maybe).

It's both a good and a bad thing.

[-] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I have two older siblings that are xennials, and I would say people born from about the late 70’s to the early 90’s represent the peak of technological literacy. It’s almost like a bell curve… the further you get away from each end of that range, the more technologically incompetent (on average) people are.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
884 points (94.9% liked)

Greentext

4636 readers
1724 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS