1063
reminder rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

edit: GUYS fuck stalin and fuck tankies, period. i understand that this community is more sensitive than most to pro-stalinist vibes, and i apologize for unintentionally twinging that nerve, but you need stop calling each other (and me) slurs

good heavens, happy new year, fuck incarceration and murder in all forms

(mods pls also do your job and help with the slurs thing)

edit2: big thank u 2 da mods for helping with the slurs thing u guys rock 😎 💕

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 54 points 1 year ago

“any and all of my country’s actions are beyond criticism because at least we didnt kill them

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

An important part of critical thinking is the ability to see flaws in comparisons and arguments even when they point towards conclusions you agree with. It’s telling that you interpreted their comment the way you did.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

It's telling, the way you're talking about this. Unless OP is defending Stalin, something I've not seen evidence of. It's pointing out how hypocritical most criticisms of Stalin are. The whole point of it, whether it's 100% accurate. Is to bait hypocrites out into "but Stalin" bullshit. If their gulags are wrong. Maybe we should reevaluate our own similarly troubling practices.

Don't get me wrong, despite being libertarian Marxist. I'm wildly against Lenin, Stalin, Mao, hell Engles for that matter etc. But Americans general hypocrisy make our criticism pointless and largely mute. Making you and the other person ironically, the ones likely failing at critical thinking

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You are probably the first libertarian marxist I have seen. It's an idea I played around with at one point.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 20 points 1 year ago

my response was sarcasm and an intentional fallacy in the form of an appeal to incredulity for the sake of rhetoric ❤️

if you think that counts as an interpretation thats on u bestie

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 27 points 1 year ago

my response was sarcasm and an intentional fallacy in the form of an appeal to incredulity for the sake of rhetoric

My bullshit-english translator is a bit rusty, but all I'm getting out of this is "I intentionally wrote a wildly incorrect comment just for funsies" in which case fuck off

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

If you run it through the translator a second time, you get “lulz u got trolled”.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 year ago

And if you run it through a third time, you get a recipe for an excellent strawberry pie, somehow.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

you’re welcome yall 🥰🥧🍓

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Hey, hey. Come on, now. The United States doesn't just lock up brown people. We execute many on the spot, without provocation or probable cause. Credit where credit is due.

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
1063 points (99.9% liked)

196

16769 readers
2610 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS