92
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rojo27@hexbear.net 62 points 11 months ago

What exactly does sexual liberation and equal rights mean to this person?soviet-hmm

[-] Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 11 months ago

If I had to give them the benefit of the doubt: that prior to Western Capitalism (Imperialism, etc.), being queer (in whatever way; being attracted to the same gender, identifying with a gender other than your agab, not fitting in with either gender's norms, etc.) was not an "identity" the way it is today; that, like with race, the distinction is made to otherize and oppress (though, of course, while that oppression is happening, those identities can also be a rallying point for those oppressed cultures themselves).

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

Some intersectionalists and Marxists themselves might argue that "identities" in that sense only exist in the context of minoritization. Of course, the quickest glance at Chinese law would show that queer people are minoritized (though less than in the US in many respects) and one could further argue that America is trying to rainbow-wash western cultural hegemony using its exports, but I feel like that's not quite the position we see in the OOP.

I think there is at least a plausible hypothetical context in which the censorship of those rainbow-washed exports makes sense, in the circumstance of wanting to develop a Chinese cultural understanding and acceptance of queerness rather than having the American understanding dictated to them. Whether this has any bearing on actual policy, I don't know, but it's imo the stronger version of the actual position taken by people rightly called social chauvinists.

[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At minimum, men loving men was completely normalized for millennia, None of our religions ever had weird clauses about "sodomy". The first anti-queer laws and anti-queer attitudes were direct imports from the west in the 19/20th century. If you want to fight for queer rights it would be easier to appeal to the Chinese equivalent of "RETVRN" sentiments than associate yourself with the culture that both introduced homophobia in the first place and is using it as an excuse to commit genocide.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

Was it completely normalized? I had the impression that it was sort of a "don't ask, don't tell" thing in that it wasn't a basis of proactive persecution but it was kind of kept under wraps.

[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Song_of_the_Yue_Boatman

The Chinese idiom, ‘斷袖之癖’ /tuan ɕiou ʈʂɻ̩ pʰi/ (the predilection of the cut sleeve), comes from a historical account wherein an emperor’s male lover fell asleep against his sleeve, so the emperor cut it off lest he disturb him. The idiom has then bore the signification of homosexuality.

https://www.linguisticsociety.org/content/im-cut-sleeve

It was pretty openly practiced.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

An emperor is a pretty small and potentially idiosyncratic sample. I'm not saying it isn't the case, but this doesn't go very far in helping to tell.

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The cut sleeve story is about the Han Emperor Ai and his partner Dong Xian. During the Han dynasty, about a third of the emperors were bisexual. It was common enough that Sima Qian even included a chapter on it (佞幸列傳 Biographies of Male Favorites). Sons were supposed to succeed their father, not empresses, concubines, or male favorites. Nevertheless, Emperor Ai basically tried to make Dong Xian his successor. It failed spectacularly. Towards the end of the Han dynasty, we also know that General Liang Ji, his servant Qin Gong, and wife Sun Shou were a throuple. A century before them, General Huo Guang, his favorite Feng Zidu, and wife Xian were a throuple as well.

Homosexual relationships among the ruling class are attested back to the Zhou dynasty. Han Fei wrote about Duke Ling of Wei falling in love with Mizi Xia and giving him special treatment as a result. Historical criticism of these gay relationships concerned vanity and being unqualified, not the gay aspect. The male favorite phenomenon ended by the Song dynasty.

Eventually Confucianism caught on, placing emphasis on the (patriarchal, heterosexual) family. Of course, economic systems based on private property tend to develop these ideologies, so China shouldn't be viewed as exceptional. They have Confucianism, we have the nuclear family. Whatever. Point is, heterosexual marriage and reproduction were socially important, but this wasn't a rejection of homosexual relationships per se. It did however make it very difficult to have a lifelong gay relationship. The Ming-era bureaucrat Shen Defu wrote that in Fujian there was an institution of homosexual marriage where a younger and older man would move in together and sometimes adopt. After 20 years, the older one would find a wife for the younger man, and they'd break up. However, there are some exceptional cases.

There's the Three kingdoms and Six Dynasties period (I think) story of Wang Zhongxian and Pan Zhang who are described to be "as affectionate as husband and wife." They were intelligentsia rather than royalty. After a lifelong relationship, they died together and were mourned by everyone who knew them.

Speaking of the middle class (or whatever, sorry I'm not well versed in historical Chinese class systems), there's a record stating that during the Liu Song dynasty (275-290 CE), MLM relationships were so common that it was causing estrangement between husband and wife. That said, people often exaggerate about this sort of thing. Men were legally allowed to have multiple lovers, but women were not. Women were also disadvantaged, so information on sapphic relationships is scarce.

In the 1700s, Li Guiguan and Bi Yuan exchanged vows of fidelity and were basically married. One was an actor, and the other was a bureaucrat. At the time, actors were low class, not respected, and overlapped with prostitution. As a result, there were centuries of legislation criminalizing these types of relationships, but enforcement wasn't common. I think it was most consistently repressive during the Qing dynasty, but I forget all the details. Unfortunately, official-actor relationships are the only example of lower class homosexuality I can think of. Historians were not rolling with the LGBT peasantry. 😔

I would recommend reading Li Yu (1611–1680). He was a Ming dynasty writer that apparently wrote erotica (I have not read it) as well as gay stories (which I have read). He's the legend that wrote The Fragrant Companion. It's a sapphic play with a happy ending written in the 17th century. Incredible. There's also an English translation published. He also wrote “A Male Mencius’ Mother” (Nan mengmu jiaohe sanqian 男孟母教合三遷) which is an MLM story. It's weird, and expresses skepticism in lifelong gay relationships. It depicts pederasty basically. Good read if you're studying this subject, but bad read if you just want to read gay romance.

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

Saving this because it's got a lot of history to read and research

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Thanks I did a group project on it last year so I was just going through my prior research

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

You did wonderful work. It really shows how much effort you put into it

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Aw thanks! It was just for an elective, so a bit shallow. I'm going to do my senior project on the same topic, so as long as I don't have a mental breakdown, expect a much more thorough post in the future!

[-] WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

I don’t know if having every country on Earth go through their own Stonewall and their own decades of violent gay oppression/resistance conflict is really the way to do things

I also don’t think is fair or realistic to expect queer people to just accept the suffering of other queer people like them if it happens in another country

[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Yue Boatman is a better example. Idk it's not exactly easy to find English sources for this stuff.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

Makes sense, ty!

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago

Sex for me and not for thee?

[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

Charitably, they mean a man can fuck dudes without it being gay because the concept of gay didn't exist.

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago

It's not gay if the proletariat is sexually liberated

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15918 readers
3 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS