Is AMD really that much better? (self.linux_gaming)

submitted 1 year ago by SpicyTofuSoup to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey everyone,

I'm currently rocking a 3080 I bought second hand in my Arch Linux rig. It works great under xorg but not so much wayland. There are a number of bugs and gaming performance is worse. I would like to use wayland in general for the mixed refresh rates with dual monitors. My question is: Is AMD really that much better than Nvidia? Is the AMD experience issue free with wayland? Also, how is hardware encoding with AMD? I'm particularly curious how performance is for game streaming with sunshine. I currently use nvenc hardware encoding which is amazing and feels like there is no latency. Does AMD have a similar experience?

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You might be exaggerating a little bit on the dates, 10 years ago in 2013 AMD was pretty shit on Linux. You had to choose between the closed source catalyst driver that made you have to prevent Xorg from being updated, or enjoy the slideshow with the Radeon open source one. The new driver only got announced in 2014, and released in 2015. I hear it's much better now, but hadn't had the chance to test it yet.

[-] ugo@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah that’s fair. My memory is bad, but I think I remember installing the Radeon driver a long time ago. But then again, I’ve been using the AMDGPU driver for basically as long as I can remember. Must have been after 2015 then, or maybe I simply didn’t notice the bad per of the Radeon driver because I was coming from iGPUs so it was still an upgrade.

In any case, the amd hardware story has been good for several years now

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023

56 points (95.2% liked)

Linux Gaming

15797 readers

7 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.