this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
106 points (99.1% liked)

News

36292 readers
2909 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I would immediately vote for this if they managed to get it on as a ballot initiative. Voting in a democracy is a right, not a privilege.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, I think it's okay to, with limits, curtail rights for actively incarcerated persons. That's sorta what incarceration is.

I don't think we should restrict their right to vote, but I don't think it's immoral. It doesn't further any of the objectives of imprisonment, and it works against any of the non-cruel ones.

Ignoring that incarceration is, at best, grossly overused.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The thing is that restricting the right to vote opens the door for incarcerating segments of the population to suppress votes.

The Nixon administration did it when they made marijuana and cocaine schedule 1 (they literally admitted it was so they could charge black people and hippies with felonies).

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, I would agree. We shouldn't selectively enforce the law or shape the law to target specific groups. We shouldn't deny people the right to vote.

I just think it's a question of policy, not ethics.

The argument that the incarcerated should be able to vote because voting is a right is weak because they're already being stripped of rights as punishment following due process. "If we're denying you the right to be in the community, why would we let you keep the right to have a say in our community?".

Instead, it's better to focus on encouraging the incarcerated to be more constructively engaged in the community, which voting is one part of when coupled with civic awareness.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago

They're not denied the right to be a part of the community, they're merely restricted from moving freely within it. They still have social connections, family, and possessions. Most will eventually be released and regain their freedom, and when that happens they'll be living under laws passed during their incarceration.

Beyond that, democracy isn't just a policy choice, it is a system inherently based on the ethics of governance. You can't separate it out, because the foundation is that people have a right to contribute to the decisions that impact their lives. That's an ethical stance.

[–] Regna@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

A right and a mandatory part of being in a society.