271
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Consumer Reports has found that plastics retain a "widespread" presence in food despite the health risks, and called on regulators to reassess the safety of plastics that come into contact with food during production.

The non-profit consumer group said on Thursday that 84 out of 85 supermarket foods and fast foods it recently tested contained "plasticizers" known as phthalates, a chemical used to make plastic more durable.

It also said 79% of food samples in its study contained bisphenol A (BPA), another chemical found in plastic, and other bisphenols, though levels were lower than in tests done in 2009.

Consumer Reports said none of the phthalate levels it found exceeded limits set by U.S. and European regulators.

It also said there was no level of phthalates that scientists confirm is safe, but that does not guarantee the safety of foods you eat.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago

We all look back at how they used to have asbestos in the walls, or lead in paint and gasoline, and how stupid we were.

Future scientists will look back at this era as the micro plastics era

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago
[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

🫸Aliens🫷

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

My doctor told me yesterday that it was already in all our bloods. Says they know it will effect our health badly just not sure how yet.

We need to end the use of plastic.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 17 points 10 months ago

They've even found it in fetuses. I'm convinced that microplastics will wipe out humanity before climate change does by lowering the birth rate to an unsustainable level.

[-] ef9357 11 points 10 months ago

Agreed. We never wanted plastic in the first place. Government allowed/allows industries to force it on us by removing non-plastic options.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Oh shit! But I understand they are working on a other solution to plastics just haven't cracked it yet.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I honestly find it very difficult to imagine what a modern-ish world without plastics would even look like. We'd need to find replacements for so many ubiquitous things, and not just convenience items, but important things like PCBs and medical supplies.

[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

Wr can't. It would kill millions. Not that that even matters, because it's profitable.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

We could do a lot of good by outlawing plastic bags and bottles. Those two alone We can do and use alternatives with no consequences. It also be two of the biggest plastic waste contributors.

[-] Bell@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 41 points 10 months ago

Not to downplay the importance of their findings, but they didn't find PLASTIC in food, instead they detected chemicals commonly found in plastic.

Interesting that it's BPA, since the food industry allegedly removed BPA from their packages/cans years ago. Did they add it back when nobody was looking?

[-] numberfour002@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

the food industry allegedly removed BPA from their packages/cans years ago

Even if they removed BPA entirely from consumer packaging, these are mostly or entirely processed / manufactured foods being discussed.

The chemical exposure could be coming from equipment used during the production process, from non-consumer packing/shipping of raw ingredients, and possibly even during the agricultural production stage. For example, if there's BPA in the plastics that foods come into contact with during the cooking or cooling phase (i.e. from silicone mats) it may leach into the food. Or if the food dyes in the products come to the manufacturers in packaging that contained BPA, it's a potential source of contamination. Also, modern agriculture is heavily reliant on plastics, so it's possible that these chemicals enter the products as a result of those practices.

Obviously I don't know for sure and I would almost bet that the source of contamination is different for different products, so there may not even be one right answer that covers it all.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

That completely makes sense. I guess the push to remove BPA from food packaging was only half the story, and more could have been done if we knew about it. What a shame. So many of us spent a premium on BPA-free products, buying glass jar goods instead of canned, etc...

[-] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

They didn't change much.

[-] Monument 8 points 10 months ago

Not a scientist, and can barely remember the details, buuuut…

Dropping BPA didn’t remove the issue. Manufacturers just moved on to other untested plasticizers, such as BPAF, or BPF, or BPS.

All that marketing - and it went into telling us that the product didn’t contain BPA, while ignoring that the products contained chemicals that were potentially worse!

Bisphenol compounds are used to make plastic more rigid/durable, but on the other side of it, are phthalates, which are generally used for pliability.

And this is where the “not a scientist” part shows heavily.
I don’t know if we can make plastics safe for use within our food chain. Both plastics and biological entities are carbon-based (most plastics come from crude oil), and the way we act on those is via cyclic compounds, and so chemicals that act on or modify plastics and humans are often structurally similar. Most medicines are cyclic compounds. Even sugar (glucose) is a cyclic compound.

My understanding is minimal, but my hunch is that there’s basically no safe way to retain the usefulness of plastics as they relate to food.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 19 points 10 months ago

Whelp, time to start avoiding... "food" then.

[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Yep, and, per the article, stick to the ONLY healthy choice: polar raspberry lime seltzer!

🎉🎉🎉APOCALYPSE PARTY 🎉🎉🎉

[-] MintyAnt@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Thank fuck for polar being in the clear since I subsist almost entirely on polar seltzer

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 3 points 10 months ago

Nope, I choose death instead. So... 🎉🎉🎉funeral party🎉🎉🎉!:-P

[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 11 points 10 months ago

Micro plastics are in the rain, your bloodstream, every inch of the ocean. I'm not surprised they're in every food product as well.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure of the reputation of CTV News Canada but this headline is trash. How can you enclose the words "plastics retain a "widespread" presence in food" with a link to the source material that clearly does not say that. The article itself goes on to quote Consumer Reports without mentioning plastics.

Here's a better summary;

The non-profit consumer group said on Thursday that 84 out of 85 supermarket foods and fast foods it recently tested contained "plasticizers" known as phthalates, a chemical used to make plastic more durable.

Among tested supermarket foods, Annie's Organic Cheesy Ravioli contained the most phthalates in nanograms per serving, 53,579, followed by Del Monte sliced peaches and Chicken of the Sea pink salmon.

Elevated phthalate levels were also found in products such as Cheerios, Gerber baby food and Yoplait yogurt, and several burgers, nuggets and fries from Wendy's, Burger King and McDonald's.

Consumer Reports said none of the phthalate levels it found exceeded limits set by U.S. and European regulators.

It also said there was no level of phthalates that scientists confirm is safe, but that does not guarantee the safety of foods you eat.

Phthalates and bisphenols can disrupt the production and regulation of estrogen and other hormones, potentially boosting the risk of birth defects, cancer, diabetes, infertility, neurodevelopmental disorders, obesity and other health problems.

The Consumer Reports article is pretty good. It goes on to explain how both plasticizers and plastics get into our food system and bodies then provides the phthalate value (nanograms per serving) of each supermarket and fast food they tested.

There's also a CR petition to get plasticizers out of food. https://action.consumerreports.org/cro-20240108-phthlates

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

CTV headline:

Consumer Reports finds 'widespread' presence of plastics in food

CR headline:

The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food

CR headline wins for nuance, inarguably, yes. CTV headline fits the takeaway soundbite for the average consumer.

Average Joe understands “plastic” better than “plasticizer”, and certainly better than “bisphenols & phthalates”. A rallying call to “get plastic out of our food” should be as if not more likely to eventually reach target groups (politicians & manufacturers).

Well, I did think of one problem. You don’t want labels that claim “plastic free“ when they still contain dangerous plastic-related chemicals.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
271 points (98.2% liked)

News

23329 readers
3850 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS