1833
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 498 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the correct response. Either everyone has protection or no one has. Not that I'd trust apple anyway but by pulling the service your average person is likely to make some noise because they can feel the effect.

[-] hardypart@feddit.de 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not even an Apple user but somehow I still feel like Apple is one of the very last companies where privacy and the security of your data is more worth than a dime.

[-] zettajon@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nope, Apple sells your data just as much as Google does: https://www.insiderintelligence.com/content/apple-ad-revenues-skyrocket-amid-its-privacy-changes https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/12/22/23513061/apple-iphone-app-store-ads-privacy-antitrust#luMMel

While people noticed their new policies against 3rd party apps, that masked the fact that those policies carved out an exception for first party apps, meaning they collect (anonymous) data on you through Health, Journal, Music, etc. just like every other company. "Trusting them more" is simply a result of you and everyone else getting hit with their privacy ads recently.

Edit: "just like every other company" meant Google and Microsoft, i.e. the other big equivalent tech companies, my fault for not being specific.

[-] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 141 points 1 year ago

While I’m all for calling out companies for abusing your privacy, your own links show that they don’t collect as much data as google. They could (and should) be better though.

[-] khajimak@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

Nope apple is literally worse than hitler, spez, and elon musk confirmed. Tim apple fucked my wife in front of me.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

You lucky sonofabitch. You got to witness the ol Apple Pie with your own two eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 87 points 1 year ago

Anonymous data is actually pretty different to the data everyone else collects, which literally has your name and picture

Apple’s data is useful for trends but it can’t be used to study who I am.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer 68 points 1 year ago

As much as Google? Likely not. Does their carefully curated pro-privacy image actually match their practices? Also likely not.

[-] C4ptFuture@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

“Just as much as Google.” LMAO. We have an expert here.

[-] SidneyGrant@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago

I feel like wuth the amount of stuff done on device and not in the cloud with iPhones and other Apple products, saying that Apple sells just as much as Google is at the very least disingenuous…

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] MxM111@kbin.social 74 points 1 year ago

I think this is correct response not just in case of morality, but in case of technology. How can you guaranty privacy of a call if the recipient is from UK?

[-] EighthLayer@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

iMessage isn’t a big loss in the UK. FaceTime would be.

WhatsApp pulling out of the UK would have the biggest impact. Almost everyone uses it here.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] irkli@lemmy.world 209 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder how many complaining here actually read even this bland and uninformative article.

At issue I believe (because it is not stated, but discussed elsewhere in better venues) is that UK wants to be able to see inside encrypted comms and files, under the guise of CSAM detection. Apple is right to oppose it.

Arguments based on hypocrisy real or perceived in other venues (china) has nothing to do with this decision its just piss-taking. Give it a rest.

[-] Misconduct@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Other than their asinine charging cable/accessory situations I consistently find myself agreeing with Apple pretty much any time any government body or group is mad they won't do something.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

They're generally on the wrong side of the battle for right to repair and removable batteries too.

But yeah, privacy they almost always have the right of it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago

Remember how everyone kicked up a giant stink about apple adding "on device CSAM scanning when uploading photos to iCloud"?

They did that precisely because it would allow them to search for CSAM without giving up any privacy. As I said back when all that rage was happening, if apple don't get to implement it this way you can be damn sure that the government is going to force them to implement CSAM scanning in a much more privacy-destroying way, and well here we are.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dionysus@lemmy.world 160 points 1 year ago

There’s legitimate criticism to be made for Apple, but this is something I really appreciate about them.

[-] TerraNova@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 year ago

Walled garden aside, I think they do care about privacy and security.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's their brand. And I'm glad it is. It's something Samsung can't copy (I presume because of the Google backbone) or attack.

(Written on a Samsung phone btw.)

Edit. I should probably add why it's good even when I'm not in their ecosystem. It raises the bar for competition and shows that privacy adds value.

[-] Juviz@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

I don’t know if they actually care, but I think they figured privacy was a great niche to jump in when they started losing more and more market share to android

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyLikeAMouse@feddit.uk 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The incumbent government is circling the drain and are, it seems, determined to leave a trail of destruction and burned bridges for their successors to repair.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 year ago

That is how conservative parties work, yes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MR_@ttrpg.network 26 points 1 year ago

Then they can point how useless the government is and get back in power

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ryannathans@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

God damn bullshit always "for children and terrorists"

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 83 points 1 year ago

There are a lot of things to hate about Apple, but this I can get behind. Get people using 3rd party messaging apps too! Preferably ones with e2e encryption.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Paws@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

Signal and WhatsApp have also said they'd likely leave the UK market if this bill is passed as it currently is.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Signal should still work there if people want to use it, and they don't block it with a Great British Firewall.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] breakfastmtn@geddit.social 68 points 1 year ago

Don't you know anything, Brits? Apple only strips security features for the Chinese government, you fools!

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] ritswd@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

I once had a conversation under NDA (which has expired since) with an engineer at Apple who was working on iCloud infrastructure, and he was telling me that his team was a bit shocked to read that Dropbox was releasing apps for photos at the time “because they’ve noticed that most of the files users are uploading to Dropbox are photos”. He was like: how do they know that exactly? His team had no idea and couldn’t possibly find out if the encrypted files they were storing were photos, sounds, videos, texts, whatever. That’s what encryption is for, only the client side (the devices) is supposed to know what’s up.

Not having that information meant a direct loss of business insights and value for Apple, since Dropbox had it and leveraged it. But it turns out Apple doesn’t joke around about security/privacy.

[-] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

What?

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303

Under Standard Data Protection photos, general drive storage and device back up are not end-to-end encrypted. Meaning that Apple has full access to reading and analyzing them.

Under Advanced Data Protection which is an opt-in feature available since iOS 16.2, you can have those files end-to-end encrypted.

End-to-end encryption makes the user responsible for keeping an encryption key safe, irreversibly losing their data if they lose the key. It's not practical for the general population. I would guess its use is in low single digit percent of apple customers.

And this feature came out in December 2022. A bit over half a year ago. Unless your friend's NDA was super short, I presume the conversation took place before it was released. Either your friend was bullshitting you under an NDA or he's an idiot.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

The one good thing I can say about apple is that they at least push back against this kind of bullshit, even if they only do so for marketing.

[-] Zpiritual@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

The other side is that they'll also push back against good stuff for the consumer since everything they do is completely out of self interest.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago
load more comments (30 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 47 points 1 year ago

Those proposals will never be made law and acted upon.

It's infeasible nonsense to pander to the Daily Mail reading curtain-twitchers. They've had 13 years to try and do this. If they wanted to (and indeed if it was in any way possible), they'd have done it already.

It'll be just "Vote for us and we'll make your children safe from nonces and muzzies!" until the end of time.

Eh, I never thought the GOP would actually overturn abortion rights because it's such an effective red herring to get their base to keep voting against their best interests, but here we are.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MR_GABARISE@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

I'll be damned if we'll have to thank the UK for getting RCS normalized.

[-] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

This has nothing to do with RCS from what I read on the article. It looks like the UK wants to be able to tell companies to disable security features such as End to End Encryption so that they can view the messages.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net 37 points 1 year ago

Rare Apple W.

[-] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Why don't politicians just fuck off?

Nothing they ever do about anything leads to an improvement.

[-] _TheNardDog_@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I agreed that they should definitely fuck off, but this will be pushed y the security services. A change of government won’t change the drive for this sort of bollocks.

“Oh but what about the criminals, terrorists and pedos?”

What about all the people that aren’t that who loose their privacy?

[-] Fylkir 28 points 1 year ago

“Oh but what about the criminals, terrorists and pedos?”

What about the Windsors?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CaptObvious@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Why can't the UK govt simply rent their spyware from Israel, like everyone else?

[-] Jackolantern@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

They had a different response to China though. Telling.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 26 points 1 year ago

NSA Access Only!

[-] whileloop@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I can't believe I'm saying this but...good guy Apple?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
1833 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

57175 readers
3817 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS