294
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 103 points 10 months ago

At what point do you start to think "Huh, maybe this DOESN'T work..."

[-] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 125 points 10 months ago

The thing about sovereign citizens is that the "rules" they're taught are always so arcane and convoluted that their the conman "teaching" them can always point to something they didn't do correctly. So people like the one in this post will be told "Oh, you cited the Magna Carta and correctly declared yourself a ship at sea, but you failed to hop on one leg while reciting the 'Corpus Juris Civilis' backwards, that means you did it wrong and the State still had power over you."

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Magic is the same way. The bigger the claim of the spell the harder it is to do the ritual. That way you are more invested in it working. When you look at very simple spells the claims are much smaller. Like a rope binding ceremony. Takes a few minutes and it claims to make you feel a bit better about stuff vs one spell that claims you can talk to demons but only if you basically live without food showering and sleep for a month.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

For some reason I'm now imagining a failed casting of Resurrection in D&D getting traced to the required diamond worth at least 1000 gold losing its value because someone recently found a rich diamond vein and it caused all diamonds to depreciate in value.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

Imagine a campaign where all gemstones need appraising by some (hidden) skill check. The true value is simply hidden from the players. The gem sellers naturally overprice their wares as well, so you can never be truly certain that this diamond you paid 500g for is worth at least the 300g needed for that Revivify.

(I am aware that this idea is terrible)

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago

If they understood the concept of testing a theory and looking at data, they wouldn't be where they are.

So, never? They'll just claim they're persecuted.

[-] kusuriya@infosec.pub 27 points 10 months ago

Every one Ive seen get the hint is usually when they go to jail for contempt for a few days.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Makes me wonder if judges who show them leniency do so out of pity or spite.

[-] kusuriya@infosec.pub 6 points 10 months ago
[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 10 months ago

Judge, maliciously: wait, let him cook

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They only ever try this shit for small relatively inconsequential stuff and since most sovereign citizens are middle class people a lot of them do kind of get away with it (not because of the sovereign citizen stuff but because it's small potatoes and the justice system is kinder to middle class people than it is to poor people, so their case/charges often get dropped or dismissed or they get a good deal, etc) and I'm pretty sure that leads them to believing that it does work more often than not and they tell all their friends at the next BBQ about how they totally beat the system with this one neat trick. Like I've never heard of a sovereign citizen trying this shit for stuff like grand theft, assault, murder, etc. It's always stuff like low level traffic violations, which are already things they're likely to only get a slap on the wrist for.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago

This strikes me as similar to flat earth, in that if you even bothered to think about it for a minute you'd realize it couldn't possibly be the case.

Is there a massive global conspiracy involving hundreds of millions of people which doesn't benefit anyone...hmm... probably not.

Or, could we have a civilization if people could just opt out of any responsibility or obligations...hmm... probably not.

[-] catonwheels@ttrpg.network 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I disagree it makes sense in a just but crazy world view.

How many times have you not heard a rich person got Scot free? Or how they seems to get so many benefits that you and I don't get.

It always seems to involved with lawyers. A group of people that using very specific language.

Maybe they bake in loopholes were you can say a specific phrase. That the rich can just walk free by uttering them but you don't and end up in prison?

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

No, that's called money. None of this nonsense makes even an iota of sense.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Thats the thing. Sovereign Citizen stuff starts out sane.

Sane: Naval courts have a weird flags.

Insane: therefore a weird flag means a you are in a naval court

Sane: running a corporation can shield you from civil liabilities. If the corporation gets sued there is a lot less of a chance your life will be ruined.

Insane: I can do whatever I want by calling myself a corporation.

Sane: during the chaos that was the early days of the FDR first administration some accountant decided that everyone just has a sum of money for being born and the government was managing it for them.

Insane: you can tap into this temporary accounting trick from a century ago and get lots of free money.

Sane: lots of laws really do depend on everyone just agreeing what a word means. If a lawyer can shift the meaning slightly unexpected results can occur, on rare occasion.

Insane: I can drive as fast as I want as long as I say I am traveling not driving

Sane: depressingly the wealthy and powerful are often shielded from the results of their actions to an extent

Insane: I can do what I want as long as I pay off a judge.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Wow! That is a spot on insight I didn't notice. Good job!

[-] delitomatoes@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Thanks, really good way of framing it.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 32 points 10 months ago

Administrative process? Under whose authority? Don't they by definition reject authority?

[-] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

The best summary of sovereign citizens I've seen is that they treat the law as a djinn that can be bound to their will if they speak the proper legal spells. As such in sovereign citizen world they are completely immune to any sort of legal restraints or obligations, but at the same time they can cast spells to make the djinn prosecute whomever they want.

[-] MSgtRedFox@infosec.pub 31 points 10 months ago

For some reason, really enjoy watching these people get destroyed by the legal process, but I suppose that's because I subscribe to it as our common social contract.

There's also things I don't like, and I understand the desire to rail against the system. But I hope I would do it a little smarter...

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago

They are just sad and mislead people. I'd rather have some real assholes have their comeuppance, imho

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have a hard time watching sovereign citizen videos without thinking that these people are real assholes, too. It's like the self-entitled Karen "I wanna talk to your manager" types, but much, much, much worse.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago

They are. I think they try and emulate the way they think rich people operate. They pretend to be above the law.

However I think they are misled and unlike what they aspire to be they will feel the wrath of the system, and it isn't kind. In all I feel pity, though, they are desparate human beings that are extorted and manipulated.

I would rather see the real rich bastards swallowing the bitter pills they will have to swallow.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Those guys are so stupid, it is actually fun to watch (here from abroad).

How many of those stunts does it take before they put such a nutcase in the loony bin where he belongs?

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

(here from abroad)

I used to laugh at Americans for sovereign citizens.

Then I laughed at German Reichsburger.

And now we've got Autonomous people here in the Netherlands.

I'm still laughing at them, don't get me wrong, but I'd be surprised if you don't have a national version of the same thing. The funniest thing is when they make references to legal systems that are clearly not yours. Our constitution doesn't have amendments, for example, but that doesn't stop them.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Well, those nutty Reichsbürger are ours, but overall, they are way less dangerous than the SCs in the US. Sounds like your Autonomous Citizens are as stupid as ours.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

More likely they'll just bankrupt the guy.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No loss, either.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I wanna see the follow up post!

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

She sent this letter and then never posted again..

Of course it’s notarized. Is this whole thing just a scam by notaries to drum up more reasons to notarize documents? /s

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

If I were a notary and the sovcits came to me to notarize their stupid documents I'd be like 'LOL sure" and charge them double.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

A notary is just witnesses that an important document exists and save a copy of what they saw. I don’t think there’s any expectation that they verify things like correctness or legality. They’re not paid to have an opinion

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Wow! It must be because she went on an extended vacation with all that money she got! :P

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

An extended vacation to a hotel with bars and a metal toilet.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 14 points 10 months ago

The batshit dumbass refuses to talk to him over the phone... yeah, that'll teach him.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

What is secured party creditors?

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

They think if they become a secured party creditor it means they don't have to pay any debts. It's just another sovcit thing.

[-] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The secret is, the more questions you ask the more questions you have!

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 10 months ago

They're not the first person to have this idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGex0kLgNok

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago

yeah, good luck with that

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
294 points (98.0% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2663 readers
3 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS