this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
212 points (99.1% liked)

Oklahoma

308 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Oklahoma community on Lemmy!

This is a place for sharing local news, weather, sports, events, photos, and everyday life in the Sooner State.

Our community is a hub for Oklahomans to connect, share, and stay informed about the latest happenings in our state.

Whether you’re a lifelong resident or a recent transplant, we welcome you to join our community and be a part of the conversation.

Community Rules: Be Civil. No Harassment. No Spam. No NSFW Content. No False Information.

.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thantik@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That or the "Let's make porn a felony" bill

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I hate that I searched for Oklahoma news, and this didn't even come up. :[

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Was it just the act of being Oklahoma or did something happen?

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well their senator tried to make watching a porn a felony.

[–] TheBiscuitLout@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s gone so far down the rabbit hole that he can only cum if it’s illegal, so if he makes everything illegal, his life gets loads easier

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And ban premarital sexting which I can’t figure out if it’s more funny or horrifying. Definitely both though

[–] blogoklahoma 6 points 1 year ago

Just look at the rest of the feed. It's one thing after another.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

~~Nationwide~~
International

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I thought this was just a state law. He’s pushing this at the National level?? Oh my.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They're probably pissed at Tennessee for stealing today's disgusting humiliation

[–] xulfer 4 points 1 year ago

Sad that there is such contention on which national embarassment this is referring to.

[–] soviettaters@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happened? I haven't seen anything.

[–] muse@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Libs of TikTok advising the board of education, bill to make porn illegal are the two new ones this week

[–] soviettaters@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oklahoma stays winning

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Interestingly enough, slavery.

When Texas sought to enter the Union in 1845 as a slave state, federal law in the United States, based on the Missouri Compromise, prohibited slavery north of 36°30' parallel north. Under the Compromise of 1850, Texas surrendered its lands north of 36°30' latitude. The 170-mile strip of land, a "neutral strip", was left with no state or territorial ownership from 1850 until 1890. It was officially called the "Public Land Strip" and was commonly referred to as "No Man's Land."

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is an excellent show "How the States got their Shapes" that explains the history of all states.

Fun fact: Chicago was in Michigan but they extended the Illinois border to connect them to the lakes and keep them with the union states.

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks! I'll check it out.

The first 13 states and a bit westwards: let's really make this right and detailed!

After a while: another state joining!? sigh, just give me a ruler and a pen

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Also explained in that show. The borders are rough on the East because they were based on rivers and geographic features. As we moved West we invented and introduced railroads and those became our new borders hence the squareness.

[–] Xepher@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

…the shape of the state?