449
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

With near-total bans on abortion in 14 states, the laws on miscarriage are vague – stoking fears of criminal consequences and leaving women desperate

For a long time after her miscarriage, Rebecca sat on the toilet, trying to figure out what to do.

“I thought about fishing it out of the bloody water,” she said. “I didn’t really want to hold it in my hand. I also didn’t know what I would do with it afterwards. Am I gonna put it in the trash? Am I gonna dig a hole in the backyard? What the hell am I supposed to do? I had no idea.”

It was around 3 or 4 in the morning; her husband was trying to get some sleep before work. She was exhausted and in shock.

“Ultimately, I flushed it. I didn’t want to,” Rebecca said. As she thought about it all again, she kept repeating herself: “I didn’t know what I was supposed to do.”

Rebecca, who is from Ohio, experienced that miscarriage in fall of 2014. Nine years and one supreme court decision later, another distraught woman would also miscarry into a toilet in Ohio – but after she tried to flush, she would have a very different experience. Her case would ultimately land a national spotlight on the anguish, uncertainty and even danger that millions of women, like Rebecca, have experienced in the minutes and hours after a miscarriage.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 77 points 11 months ago

The ambiguity and potential legal threats around getting pregnant are the worst part. There's no clear process and the law will be applied selectively, usually to hurt people. This whole thing is so messed up.

There's no clear process and the law will be applied selectively, usually to hurt people.

This is what the conservatives steering the country to fascism don't understand. The country they want is where the people they don't like get selectively punished.

But when it's done through selective enforcement of inhuman laws, as all fascist states operate, those people will eventually live in the same fear and anxious uncertainty that they are now so enjoying inflicting on their moral enemies.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

First they came for the ... shit, who did they go after first?! They're such hateful little troglodytes...

[-] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago

All this is happening while the older generation screeches at us to have children. No thank you, I'd rather not spend time in jail and who knows how much on court costs just because my body decided to miscarry.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 52 points 11 months ago

Women will stop going to the doctor at all to make sure there's no record of their pregnancy, just in case

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

Yup these laws are about punishing women for being imperfect vessels. To the pro birthers, If a women has a miscarriage it's obviously she did something wrong and needs to be punished. These people also believe miscarriages only existe because feminism, roe v wade, and women not accepting their place below man. Flee pro birth States! If you live in a pro choice state help those who are not get out.

[-] AndaliteBandit@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

The lesson learned here is " the only way to win is not to play". The rise in DINKS has already begun and I'm sure will accelerate in response to this nonsense. Soon the ratio of wanted children to unwanted will tip and violent crime will rise. There is a great section in freakonomics about this. I'm putting my money where my mouth is and partner is getting fixed tomorrow!

[-] paholg@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry, but that's a shit take. If someone wants to have kids, they shouldn't worry about legal trouble in the case of miscarriage. Full stop.

No one should be okay with the government having this much overreach.

[-] Hyperdinobeast@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 11 months ago

I don't think you two are disagreeing on that lol

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago

They shouldn't worry about very real legal and medical risks that will be imposed on them? Who the hell are you to tell strangers what risks they should take with their lives?

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

I think you misread that comment…

[-] tehfishman@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

It fits the pattern in this comment chain though

[-] paholg@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

I'm saying we (all of us) should find it absolutely unacceptable that these legal risks exist.

[-] Hyperdinobeast@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

I don't think you two are disagreeing on that lol

[-] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

I know it's the epitome of privledge to say this and I know it can be impossible for a lot of people for any number of reasons...

But...

If you are a woman of childbearing age and are, or even plan to be pregnant, run as fast as you can away from these states.

There was a time, not long ago, when birthing children was potentially dangerous or even fatal without modern medical care. By outlawing that care, you're taking a hard dive right back into those medieval conditions. Woman can, will, and are dying because of these laws. It's horribly, horribly, horribly wrong, and I hope it gets reversed soon.

But until then? Run.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 months ago

That's actually so fucked up that it's basically illegal to have a miscarriage.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 8 points 11 months ago

It sure would be awkward if it were to happen to thousands of women every day.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I hope all the GOP women who voted for this have miscarriages and go to prison. Because they support that for some reason.

[-] Lath@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

The obvious solution here is to not get pregnant. ...

This train of thought gets me thinking. What if these religious wackos actually understand what they're doing and their purpose is grinding procreation of a certain class to a halt?

In Texas, the vast majority of new births are latino. "White ppl" aren't having kids. What if this is intentional and those dumb fucks aren't just shooting themselves in the face?

Could it be that these religious conservatives decided to take their toys from Earth and fuck off to whatever heaven they think they're going to?
"You can't have white people anymore! We're killing them all and letting you rot here on your own. We're going to heaven and you're not, hah!"

... Nah, can't be. They're probably just dumb.

[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

How to run a state like a moron.

  1. Make it hard to human...
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

So much more women would take another look at vasectomy in that situation.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 11 months ago

Vasectomies are for men. Women should look into getting a bisalp.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Ultimately, they'll ban that for women, but leave vasectomies available for men, because, well, men making rules for men.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
449 points (98.3% liked)

News

23618 readers
4005 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS