620
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

ProPublica editor-at-large Eric Umansky started investigating police oversight after an NYPD officer hit a teenager with a car in 2019. In the years since, he’s learned how police departments have undermined the promise of body-worn cameras.

I got my first real lesson in police accountability in 2019 on Halloween. My wife, Sara Pekow, and our daughter had watched an NYPD officer drive the wrong way up a Brooklyn street and hit a Black teenager. The police had been chasing him as a suspect in the theft of a cellphone. When the boy rolled off the car and ran away, the officers turned their attention to other nearby Black boys who seemed to be simply trick-or-treating. The police lined them against the wall of our neighborhood movie theater, cuffed them and took them away.

At the time, I was editing coverage of the Trump administration, not policing. But I was troubled and, frankly, curious. I ended up waiting outside the police precinct with the boys’ families. The boys were released hours later, with no explanation, no paperwork and no apology.

The next day I reached out to the NYPD’s press office and asked about what happened. Eventually, a spokesperson told me that nothing inappropriate had occurred. A police car hadn’t hit the kid, he said. The kid had run over the hood of the car.

I couldn’t get it out of my head. Not just what had happened, but the NYPD’s brazen denial of what my family and others had witnessed. Surely, I thought, that wouldn’t be the end of it.

I was wrong.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 54 points 9 months ago

The kid had run over the hood of the car.

As one does...

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 9 months ago

Apparently cops in NYC love to park illegally on sidewalks, so I can imagine that more than a few disgruntled New Yorkers have run over hoods of police cruisers.

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 32 points 9 months ago

The title already explains why.:-(

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

What's the point of even having them if the police can just decide not to release the footage then?

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

We need a parallel federal oversight agency that has no connection to the police that manages all this evidence. A bland, insulated, bureaucratic and procedural agency that is just tasked with storing and organizing evidence where the police can't touch it and is so isolated and procedural that there's no biased decision making on when to release evidence. That the police are trusted with managing the evidence themselves is insane to me.

[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

of course, it should be public, but don't question having the cameras just because it's not. let's fix the law. at least the footage exists, or did exist.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Well, not necessarily. I'm 100% on board with public police accountability, but I do think there's a legitimate question of privacy. Yes, everything the police do on the clock should be subject to scrutiny, but not so for every person they detain.

[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

I have always felt like everything from a public officer should be streamed in real time and laws should work around that. I have no doubt I haven't thought about that enough, but the benefits seem to outwit the negatives. I've had the cops called on me and I've called the cops on others. never is it a good experience, but to have a true record… well, I wouldn't want it on my resume; hmm. I guess it could hurt people. even if they see everything the cops do it may not show the whole story. Good point.

[-] ElJefe@lemm.ee 25 points 9 months ago

Essentially because ACAB.

Fuck the police

[-] hypnotoad__@lemmy.ml 20 points 9 months ago

Racism, the answer is racism

[-] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

It's because of the laws called Police Officers Bill Of Rights. The law essentially ensures that police are investigated and cleared by other police and forbids civilian oversight.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Police Officers Bill Of Rights

less than half the states have these, but yeah, it's bullshit. the unions as well exercise far outsized influence on policing instead of administrating LEOs, it's disgusting how much they'll blackmail cities for in order to get lucrative pay, no consequences and military spec hardware.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

One of the many coming reckonings for the people of the United States of America.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

lol...

a reckoning would be welcome but ain't holding my breath.

[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago

Those kids were probably assaulting the officers fists with their faces. Nothing to see here.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

It’s okay, vacation days were docked!

Excellent reporting from ProPublica, who can use your donations if you’re able.

[-] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

It feels more like vacation days are added on via 'suspended with pay'.

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
620 points (99.7% liked)

News

23329 readers
2886 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS