315
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ballskicker@sh.itjust.works 119 points 6 months ago

It's amazing how dumb this entire situation is. To my knowledge she hasn't even publicly endorsed a candidate or political party, right? Just suggested her fans register to vote?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 148 points 6 months ago

Republicans understand that demographics are against them, and their only chance is to whip their base into a froth while simultaneously making it harder for Others to vote.

[-] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 58 points 6 months ago

Ding ding ding

Just like it is every election season. Republicans rely on the electoral vote, propaganda, and systematic diseducation (idk if that’s even a word, case in point?) to ensure victories over the populace

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Education" is from Latin "educ" which means "lead out". The reverse would be to lead in, which is "ducere in". So if you want to make a new but old-fashioned word, I suggest "ducereination" or because the "e-i"" syllables are uncomfortable to say and would have likely been dropped over time, "ducerination". The "c" might be pronounced as an "s" or as a "k" depending on how the word would have evolved since ancient times, but I prefer a "k" sound (which I think is the wrong one according to Google) so it sounds like the "c" in "education".

Note that I don't know Latin.

[-] Skua@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

I don't know a goddamn thing about Latin grammar, but it looks like you could follow the etymology of "education" more closely. The "educ" part is itself derived from "ex ducere", so we could probably have "inducation"

[-] Promethiel@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

Y'all. Did you have your coffees this morning?

There's already an organically evolved etymologically rich word for the "passing of closed thinking", that harkens back to "leading in" or Inducing...

Indoctrination.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago

Yes. That is all she did. Got them to register to vote. She didn't even hint at who they should vote for. That might change now, and not the way Republicans want.

[-] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 40 points 6 months ago

Honestly, it's such an incredible own goal. By aligning themselves in opposition to her, Republicans are begging for her fans to vote against them.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 36 points 6 months ago

Correct. They've tacitly acknowledged for quite a while that discouraging their enemies from voting is a big part of their strategy, though, and I don't think anyone involved thinks the Taylor Swift fans are also Trump fans.

Honestly, if someone tries to tell you voting won't change anything, just point to how hard they try to rig the systems that drive it and how much they freak out about any indication that their enemies are planning to vote in large numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago

Registering to vote helps Democrats more than Republicans, because first time voters and younger voters are more likely to vote Democrat. Republicans do better when less people vote.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Registering to vote helps Democrats more than Republicans, because ~~first time voters and younger voters are more likely to vote Democrat~~ many more people want to vote for Democrats.

Though your original version is also correct.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

Yes, absolutely. If we made voting mandatory, made Election Day a national holiday, and actually managed to get our turnout over 90%, the Democrats would landslide every election and the Republicans know it.

An awful lot of Republican policy makes sense when you view them as a party with a shrinking base. They’re trying to eek out what they can before shifting over to a new base.

Rubio, Cruz, and De Santis have been trying to build Hispanic bases, though none of them are really charismatic enough to pull it off.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Here she is speaking about Republicans in a 2020 documentary. I would say it’s a bit more than asking people to register.

Edit to add: She comes across so genuinely in this clip, I really love it. Listen to her speak and then think of any time you’ve ever heard Trump speak. I can understand why they feel threatened.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

She did call Marsha Blackburn,"Trump in a wig". Her fans aren't stupid.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 105 points 6 months ago

"Donald Trump and his far-right 'holy war' against Taylor Swift could cost him the next presidential election."

News from a completely normal and not broken at all timeline. Imagine reading that sentence to someone 10 years ago.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

10 years ago was still 2 years left in the final Obama administration. Add on just a bit more to really drive those 2014 people crazy:

“After an unsuccessful violent insurrection to stay in the White House after being voted out, Donald Trump and his far-right ‘holy war’ against Taylor Swift could cost him the next presidential election.”

[-] zzzz@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

We're about 80% of the way to Idiocracy.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

We're past Idiocracy. President Camacho listened to the smartest person in the room. Trump thinks he is the smartest person in the room.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Conyak@lemmy.tf 12 points 6 months ago

I feel like that headline would be completely normal during the 80s satanic witch hunt.

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 11 points 6 months ago

I think they'd be confused about why a real estate celebrity is going after a 1 year old girl but yeah not too far off

[-] ares35@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago

who has 'pop star saves democracy' on their bingo card?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 70 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They're not trying to win the popularity contest. They're trying to win the "do what we say or maybe one of our violent followers will try to kill you" contest. That's what Hannity means by "think twice."

They abandoned the pretense of nonviolence and freedom of speech for their enemies quite a while ago.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 26 points 6 months ago

do what we say or maybe one of our violent followers will try to kill you

Like this guy.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Having watched Fox News from time to time I am amazed that this kind of thing hasn't yet started happening more often.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I guarantee you Taylor Swift has some of the best security in the world, so I'm guessing that doesn't worry her much.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 25 points 6 months ago

They could still bomb one of her concerts, or drive a car into fans waiting in line, or some other type of stochastic terrorism. Like a lot terrorism, it's not necessary to do enough to actually endanger a real high percentage of people, just enough to make anyone who won't toe the line a little fearful about their safety because of it. A little bit's enough.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

That usually backfires though.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 6 months ago

Yeah, maybe so. I hadn't really realized it before you said this, but historically the violence that helps usher in a fascist takeover is either police violence or big, public, mob-style events -- not this sneaking around planting pipe bombs nonsense. I think you may well be right that stochastic terrorism ultimately inspires more resistance then obedience.

The only analogs I can even think of where a successful fascist takeover was accompanied by terrorism in secret, are the Reichstag fire and the false-flags from Putin's early days -- and both of those inspired a strong reaction against the party that, supposedly, was the one that had perpetrated them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 60 points 6 months ago

Watching Kimmel's monologue from yesterday-

The same people who believe Joe Biden has dementia and needs Kamala Harris to feed him butterscotch tapioca every night also believe that he has somehow planned and executed a diabolicalically brilliant scheme to fix the NFL playoffs so the biggest pop star in the world can pop up on the jumbotron during the Superbowl in between a Kia and a Tostitos commercial to hypnotize her 11-year-old fans into voting for Joe Biden.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 25 points 6 months ago

So weak you can crush them, so strong you’re terrified.

[-] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

It's the Fascist™ way!

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

After 8 years of whatever Democrats claim they're doing, Donald Trump may have finally encountered opponents who are interested in fighting back.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 52 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I really, really want the history books to say that Taylor Swift was responsible for Trump losing by a landslide.

It's oddly fitting for this cursed timeline

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

You're right, it fits all too well. I'm not currently really a Taylor Swift fan but I would buy every album if she did that

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago

Out of the two of these people only one is actually a billionaire :)

That’s gotta chap his orange ass

[-] Yewb@kbin.social 44 points 6 months ago

My friends dad who had spent his entire life as a staunch republican like Reagan style came to her and said "who do you want me to vote for, you are going to be here I wont".

I hope this perspective shift happens with all boomers.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 30 points 6 months ago

spent his entire life as a staunch republican like Reagan style

TBF his perspective hasn't changed that much. It's his party that has abandoned him.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago

Ray-gun was a Trump precursor. It was Bush Sr. that took a step back from the brink and went back to just being an awful jackass.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xkoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 6 months ago

Taylor Swiftboating.

[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

After weeks of Republican media pundits and a former presidential candidate vilifying her, going as far as saying she's a Defense Department psy-op asset

Of course. Everyone is an agent of darkness. The right has this problem. They can’t say „We fight to make your lives miserable and we will fuck you and the whole nation over. It will be a complete clusterfuck”. Because that would be honest. So they have to make up enemies.

it seems all but certain Trump will jump into the fray soon after Rolling Stone reported one of his confidants predicted a "holy war" against the pop sensation.

“Holy war” sounds way cooler than what it really is. If you just could see how pathetic you really are, Donnie. And your followers are somehow even worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 4grams@awful.systems 22 points 6 months ago

I avoid pop culture wherever possible so I am almost entirely ignorant of Swift’s musical catalog. That said, the attention the republicans have been giving her lately has me interested enough to start listening to her music to see what the big deal is. I have found quite a few songs I enjoy and Apple Music has been suggesting more and more of her stuff that I find myself not skipping.

So, the GOP war on Swift has added at least one more person to her fanbase 🤣

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] RedditReject@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

The difference between Swift and Trump is that Taylor understands she needs to give back to her fans, in music and performances. Trump just sees his fans as providing something for him, their money in donations and ego boosts.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's 2024 and Swifties are scarier than Anonymous; Maybe it's looking glass-ception and we need to go through more of them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I have to agree. He will not.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
315 points (92.9% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS