977
submitted 1 year ago by narwhal@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 262 points 1 year ago

I'll keep using Firefox and be extremely vocal about websites that won't support it. I mean that's all I can really do.

[-] Wootz@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago

And hope the EU will oppose it.

[-] Niello@kbin.social 147 points 1 year ago

EU really is the one doing all the good work. Meanwhile, the US government is useless as a government for its size.

[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 82 points 1 year ago

corporate-owned america, baby!

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Why aren’t the vaccuous, corporate whore sociopaths defending our freedoms!?!

[-] dandroid@dandroid.app 50 points 1 year ago

Maybe if our politicians weren't fucking 80 years old and actually understood technology even a little bit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wagesof@links.wageoffsite.com 54 points 1 year ago

I expect we'll lose about 90% of the web within five years as this becomes normalized.

It will primarily be the seo driven AI crap driven ripoff regurgitated shitfest that's arisen in the last 5 years tho.

I'll be waiting for a search engine to arise that only shows user controllable presentation and will use that.

A way to filter out the corporate trash will make the human web better, not worse.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] mrmanager@lemmy.today 192 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It may be the last few years of the free web because of Google. Their goals are clear.

Please switch to Firefox, another search engine and another email provider...

[-] tesseract@programming.dev 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've long been trying to de-googlify myself, but it's certainly ramped up this year.

Been trying out Kagi and just set up proton mail account. Not sure what I'll land on in the end but it's nice trying out newer services.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] narwhal@lemmy.ml 174 points 1 year ago
[-] chaorace 35 points 1 year ago

Be Evil, Do Ads

load more comments (36 replies)
[-] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 139 points 1 year ago

There's a "we told you this would happen" going on here.

If chromium didn't have a monopoly amongst browsers, they would have a much harder time pushing this through.

Imagine everyone using a browser built by an advertising company.

[-] Goodie@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

That's not even the biggest level of "we told you this would happen."

They pulled this shit previously with other standards (WebHID). Where they proposed a terrible standard, and then implemented it ignoring all feedback. Only last time it played out over months, and this time... weeks?

Sweet jesus.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] IcySyndicate@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

And this is the consequence of browser vendors relying on Chromium.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ohnonono Well time to burn down google I guess ¯\(ツ)

[-] skillissuer@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

It's always good time for this

[-] anyone_yun@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago

Fuck you Google.

[-] happyfunball@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

The Internet in the last five or so years has just been less fun and interesting to use in general. Except for anywhere I can interact with friends, I just don't really care for using corporate social media sites anymore. I've pretty much removed Google from my life except for YouTube and rarely Google Maps, and if Google tries to use this to force ads into YouTube (which I'm sure is going to be one of its uses) then I will just stop using YouTube. I will just stop patronizing any site or business that tries to implement this as a feature to stop my browser choice, OS choice, or my extension choice (which included adblock extensions). I miss the days when the Internet was less corporately controlled than it is now, and I think we need a renaissance of those days.

[-] bappity@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

this is a userbase killer right here

[-] bad3r@lemmy.one 32 points 1 year ago

If manifest 3 didn't change egoogke chrome share I doubt this will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 year ago

hey everyone a friendly reminder that alternatives exist, and just drop this shit fast and move to better alternatives. In this case firefox.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 64 points 1 year ago

The problems start to happen when buisnesses adopt this en masse. Expect all banks to implement this for example. You can use Firefox all you want, but then you won't be able to do online banking.

Standards are really fucking important to help people stay functional in a society. This is one area that the ANCAP mindset just gets it totally wrong, unless you like the idea of being a hermit.

Anyway, we are already seeing some websites basically reject browsers like Firefox because they basically give the consumer too much protection and freedom. Arguably we've seen this before, but this may be a new tier of corporate lockout of open standards as consumer protection gets thrown in the trash. Thanks America.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

This needs to be pinned at the top of every single threat about this. Far too many people are just saying "Well I'll just keep using Firefox". They do not understand the gravity of the issue.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

As an aside, I know we're not supposed to care about Reddit, but the lack of this news getting any attention over there is just depressing. Hell the Firefox sub hasn't had any posts in days apparently.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 64 points 1 year ago

People that care about this stuff are probably already jumped ship.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 32 points 1 year ago

That's because the firefox sub moved to Lemmy...

Wow they moved incredibly fast, even considering the repository was first committed to in April 2023. I wonder why the outrage only started a few days ago? There was also a discussion, started in May.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Could there be lawsuits over this?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Lem0n 29 points 1 year ago

Pardon my ignorance but Can someone explain what google is trying to do?

[-] mainframegremlin@programming.dev 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pardon formatting, on mobile. Its a form of device authentication. Apple does this with safari already BTW, and it can reduce things like captcha because the authentication is done on the backend when a request hits a server. While still an issue in concept with Apple doing it, chromium browsers are a much larger market share. In layman's terms this is basically the company saying, hey you are attempting to visit this site, we need to verify the device (or browser, or add on configuration, or no ad blocker, etc) is 'authentic'. Which of course is nebulous. It can be whatever the entity in charge of attestation wants it to be.

This sets the precedent that whomever is controlling verification, can deny whomever they see fit. I'm running GrapheneOS on my phone currently, they could deny for that. Or, if you are blocking ads. Maybe you're not sharing specific information about your device, and they want to harvest that. Too bad, comply or you're 'not allowed to do x or y'.

This is the gist. The web should be able to be accessed by anybody. It isn't for companies to own nor should it be built that way. Web2 is a corporate hellscape.

Edit wrt Safari: https://httptoolkit.com/blog/apple-private-access-tokens-attestation/

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I suspect "authentic" will mean "pays a license fee to Google." In this respect it will work like other forms of DRM, and it will have the same effect of excluding new and smaller players from the market. Except in this case the market is the whole of the web.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

From my limited understanding as a common pleb, they are inserting DRM into Chromium browsers to prevent ad-blockers.

[-] Lem0n 25 points 1 year ago

Internet with no ad-blockers is like a nightmare

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rivers@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Chrome is a bag of shit anyway, easy jump

[-] venoft@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Chromium, not chrome. Which means also Brave, Edge, Opera, Vivaldi and a lot more. Basically only Firefox and Safari are left as the big non-chromium ones.

But that's not the worst of it. Even if you tear out this code, more and more websites will be built that rely on it. Which means Firefox etc also need to include it to keep functioning.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Repossess6855@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago

Feels so good to see Google getting called out for this in the GitHub comments

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Does it? It's making me depressed.

Because every last single thing said in those comments will be ignored. I sincerely doubt they're even reading them.

They know what they're doing. They know what people will say. They're going to do it anyway.

[-] appel@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Regulate Big Tech and be done with it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
977 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

34092 readers
306 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS