183
submitted 1 year ago by fox@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

I’m shocked! Who could’ve seen this coming?? /s

But seriously, the world is fucking boiling right now and these people can’t agree to some standards?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

The old men who run the world don't care because they'll be dead soon anyway.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Normal old people still care, because they care about the world and the people they love, whether or not they're still around. Sociopathic corporate and political leaders, however, don't care. The issue is not so much the age as the pathological selfishness that got them into those positions in the first place.

[-] markr@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Plus they understand that they will be safe while the peasants go through the polycrisis’ genocide .

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

People who think they'll be safe while everyone else suffers are just as deluded as those who think there is no climate crisis.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I read an article a while back about tech bros talking about surviving after "the big event" and they couldn't figure out how to stop their security forces from rebelling and not kowtowing to some wimpy tech bro after society collapses. They came up with ideas like restricting food access and, I'm not joking, exploding collars. These people are idiots.

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Yep, age doesn't matter here. Just look at Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos. They're young-ish and have no problem with watching the world burn.

[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Much more than watching.

[-] designated_fridge@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Pff, this has to do with people caring more about their polling numbers than the environment.

Actually saving the environment requires some hard sacrifices and it's hard to be the elected leader who tells their voters that they're going to pay more and get less.

But in non-democratic countries you're right of course.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

People that would lose a tiny margin of their profits would absolutely let the world burn instead, along with all biodiversity.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

I'm starting to think these people don't have our best interests in mind.

[-] Ringmasterincestuous@aussie.zone 23 points 1 year ago

At this point the best thing that summit can do for the environment is stop occurring

[-] Chup@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago

Some paragraphs for tl;dr:

The discussions with China, Saudi Arabia, and on climate issues with Russia had been "complicated", he added.

Major oil producers fear the impact of drastic mitigation on their economies, and Russia and Saudi Arabia were blamed for the lack of progress in Goa.

Reports of Saudi and Chinese resistance, he added, "fly in the face of their claims of defending the interests of developing countries".

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Why are we even consulting with oil barons on the Environment in 2023?

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Won't someone please think of the poor poor billionaires?

[-] aaron_griffin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Guillotine time

[-] Yondu_the_Ravager@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah, because combating climate change doesn’t make money

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Let's fix that with carbon pricing: tax & dividend, applies to emissions but also captured atmospheric carbon, stored underground.

So every participant in the carbon marked pays for what they emit.

The revenue can be split among:

  • Funding removal
  • Distribute per capita to make the tax progressive
  • Fund things like renewables

This could

  • make it profitable to run efficient carbon removal
  • net pay people who manage to live a low-footprint life

It always would

  • create incentives for everyone involved (private people, investors, corporations, research) to make decisions which reduce emissions, if only to save / earn money.

Price point: Take the current average price for removing one unit of greenhouse gas. Emitting one unit costs that much, increased by a factor (to fund more than just removal, or to achieve negative emissions).

[-] BackupRainDancer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If only these poor oil producers had some sort of half century or more lead to reap the benefits of their export advantage and diversify their interests. Won't someone think of how unfair it is to ask them to change? /s

[-] TheBlue22@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Fucking ghouls, we have the hottest 2 weeks in human history yet they dont do anything. Chop off their heads and redistribute their wealth

[-] malloc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

We are fucked. These G20 meetings seem kind of useless lately.

Also I wonder how many of these “environmental ministers” used private jets to get to the conference. Tone deaf assholes.

[-] Robdor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There's no plan like no plan. : )

[-] Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

All cowards.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

alright, John Kerry was part of this failure, and with his failure, also his appointer, Biden. He cant be allowed to continue to throw us further into a blazing hellscape

[-] Erk@cdda.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm sure there will be accountability aaaaaaaaany minute now. For any of the people that got us here. Aaaany minute. Yep.

[-] 6mementomori@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

the proof that the planet is fucked, and it's doomed to end us.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
183 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38965 readers
2223 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS