1005
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Reddit beats film industry, won’t have to identify users who admitted torrenting::Court quashes subpoena for names of users who talked torrenting in 2011 thread.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EmperorHenry@lemmy.world 245 points 11 months ago

I've never torrented anything, not even once. I always pay for things legitimately...no matter how hard it is to keep track of everything you're paying for or how expensive it gets to pay the same movies again and again when the billion dollar corporations randomly decide I don't own something I paid for all of a sudden. I never pirate anything.

You should only use good VPNs that are lying about their no-logs policies like Nord, Express, Private internet access and surfshark. Never TorGuard or Mullvad. TorGuard and Mullvad actually had to prove in court that they don't record their users. So they're bad and immoral for not being cucks for the establishment.

Definitely don't get torguard's proxy service to go with torguard. And definitely don't use torguard's proxy service inside of your torrenting client.

Like I said I've never pirated anything in my entire life and I never will.

[-] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 11 months ago

That's a great idea to have these comments for the posterity.
To my lawyer in the future :

"Everything I could have wrote in reddit about pirating was a lie to get upvotes. Don't take any of it seriously."

[-] EmperorHenry@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Everything I ever wrote about me pirating anything was also a lie to get upvotes! A higher Karma score on reddit means a higher standing. Which is why I always lied about having pirated things.

Now here comes the truth. I've never pirated anything, that would be wrong and immoral!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 11 months ago

Wanna play some sarcastaball?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Hubi@feddit.de 217 points 11 months ago

I don't get the hate. I enjoy shitting on reddit as much as the next guy, but defending their user's right to remain anonymous in court has been one thing they've got a pretty solid record on.

[-] NightOwl@lemmy.one 43 points 11 months ago

They are still better than meta and Twitter too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ryno364@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Not to mention this has far reaching effects past Reddit. Such as for lemmy instances.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago

Yeah nobody is all bad, even Reddit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Imagine how hard (impossible )it would be for them to actually moderate every interaction on their site? Standing up for users makes sense because they're next in the firing line.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RFBurns@lemmy.world 99 points 11 months ago

Nothing on Reddit can be proved to have come from a "user", and it's been that way since the "Great Spezzing of 2016", where 'spez' admitted to falsification and alteration of 'user' content.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 24 points 11 months ago

I mean even IRL, people talk so much crap who knows what’s actually true. Imagine if we locked up everyone for what they say. The “film industry” is insulting for even trying to push people into guilt by nothing more than what they type on a website.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Film industry should do something about the sex pests in it

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 11 points 11 months ago

Also do sonething about all their writers and actors being on strike.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 97 points 11 months ago

In the article, not one comment mentioned "piracy". They only mention "torrenting" which is not illegal and has absolutely nothing to do with these movie companies. They are grasping at straws here

[-] JollyTheRancher@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

While I do not think they were in the right to have the users “unmasked”, my understanding is that the users in question were talking about how the Austin internet provider, Grande, was good for torrenting, so the attempt to unmask the users wasn’t meant to get the users in trouble but to show that Grande benefitted financially from a lax policy towards pirating, so them not mentioning piracy in their comments wasn’t necessarily the end of the conversation, if they were willing to say now that it was in reference to piracy. I do think it sounds like grasping at straws, but I imagine the potential value they were hoping to get from Grande was worth that grasping to them

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 78 points 11 months ago

God I hate rooting for Reddit.

[-] chris2112@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

Spez may still be a corporate sellout but at least in this instance he did the right thing, probably because he determined ratting out users who pirated wouldn't make him money

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I'll acknowledge he did the right thing here, but I won't be happy about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

He didn't do it for you, he didn't do it for us. He did it for himself.

If news got out that Reddit violated anonymity, the site would be dead before the end of the week. This was a move to protect his shareholders, nothing more.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ZombieZookeeper@lemmy.world 69 points 11 months ago

Spez will turn over the names if Fidelity tells him to.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 68 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Serious question: Is admitting that you did something illegal in a conversation enough to be convicted of a crime? For example, if I say "I bought a small amount of weed from another kid at school and smoked it last year", is my statement alone enough to convict me of a crime? To clarify, they don't know a date, they don't know a place, they don't know who I bought it from, they don't know how much I bought, or how much I smoked. They really don't even know if it actually happened (sometimes people say things happened that didn't actually happen, gasp).

[-] PHLAK@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No. You could claim to have murdered someone, and they may detain you for this for some time, but without evidence of a crime I don't think they can charge you and definitely can't convict you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nioxic@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago

Lol

Talking about torrenting... thats not even illegal. Lol.

And its certainly not proof of anyone then actually breaking the law.

[-] dunestorm@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Shows how much people understand of the law when they think using Bitorrent is illegal lol

[-] Ebsku@sopuli.xyz 24 points 11 months ago

Yeah I torrent a lot of files like Linux ISOs

[-] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago

It's so much easier and faster than using some mirror

[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

I can download from mirrors at the same speeds as torrents. The trick is to have a terrible internet subscription that's easily saturated by either of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mtchristo@lemm.ee 47 points 11 months ago

Now the question is could lemmy instances resist such subpoenas in courts, especially those falling under US or EU jurisdiction ?

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 11 months ago

Doubt it. Most Lemmy instances are run by one guy on a spare PC. They're not set up to deal with legal requests, versus the police just barging in and taking the PC, while all the neighbours look on and assume you're a paedo.

While there doesn't seem to be an IP address field in the Lemmy schema, they could always get it out of the logs. There is an email address field, but I think that's only used for initial signup, verification and resetting your password, so if you used a temporary one they'd have nothing to give.

I don't know what the film industry would even do with the info if Reddit gave it to them. Likely just more bluster to deter casual pirates into thinking there are consequences to downloading the odd movie.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] HR_Pufnstuf@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Don't retain logs longer than you must for preventing attacks. They can't get what no longer exists.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

They don't have names, so Im not sure what they expect.

[-] madjo@geddit.social 40 points 11 months ago

Actually, if one uses the official Reddit app, they do have real names. It’s part of the data that the app reads out of your phone’s settings.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

The official app didn’t exist in 2011 so they likely don’t have that information unless the user kept their account and used the official app at one point

[-] inspxtr@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

has anyone made a data request, especially GDPR, to confirm this?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 27 points 11 months ago

To anyone who ever says they don't care when a political party they don't care about goes after people they don't care about, remember: this one particular court could have gone the other way, and people going after you can try as many times as they (or you) can afford to fight.

[-] JeffCraig@citizensgaming.com 27 points 11 months ago

I don't understand why they would even try to get this data. It's not like a Reddit post would stand up in court as admissable evidence of piracy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gsa32@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Rare Reddit W

[-] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At least they have doxxed themselves:

The film companies seeking Reddit users' identities include After II Movie LLC, Bodyguard Productions, Hitman 2 Productions, Millennium Funding, Nikola Productions, Rambo V Productions, and Dallas Buyers Club LLC.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

They were stupid fucking subpoenas to begin with, I'm not surprised.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1005 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

55663 readers
3004 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS