597
submitted 6 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 218 points 6 months ago

...which gets paid to the teen by the taxpayers rather than the police union, which should be paying.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 181 points 6 months ago

Should be the cop's personal liability insurance since they were breaking the law.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 118 points 6 months ago

I would rather make the police union responsible. It's the only union Republicans care about and the only union that exists in part to oppress union organizers.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The second the police union has to start footing the bill, you'll suddenly see a whole lot of cops being fired and accountability for behavior materialize out of the ether.

You'll also see a whole lot of violence in the streets, too, to be clear. Cause if theres one things cops just cant fucking stand, its being held accountable, and they'll burn the entire system down to prevent it..or, failing that, out of spite.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 18 points 6 months ago

The second the police union has to start footing the bill, you'll suddenly see a whole lot of cops being fired and accountability for behavior materialize out of the ether

Fat chance. What's more likely is that you'll see new laws pop up making it illegal to sue the police. These dirtbags aren't giving up their control.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Good. Fire the thugs and lock them up

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

They'd pay in higher insurance. Or by not hiring people who make their insurance go up.

But yeah, they should foot the bill somehow, too.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

I guess I'm just not happy with the idea of some insurance company taking the hit. It still doesn't hit cops directly enough even if their rates go up. Start making the union pay and maybe the union will make their members get in line.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

The advantage of having officers carry malpractice insurance is the same as it is with doctors. Eventually, the premiums to insure a bad officer get so high, no one is willing to pay them. Or, they simply uninsurable, as no company is willing to take on the risk. It also means there will be a large and politically connected organization (insurance companies) which have a financial interest in collecting data on bad police officers. Sure, that should be the government's job, but since we know that's not happening, why not exploit corporate greed for a positive thing?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Take it out of their pension fund.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

ACAB - all cops are broke.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Insurance companies screw over everyone. That's what they do. I'm okay with them sharing.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Insurance companies are never mandated to take a policy - pushing up premiums is an effective way to discourage future bad behavior.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

If they paid in being more cautious about hiring shitty cops I'd call that a win... while ACAB, some are definitely much bigger assholes.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

We say ACAB because any high school kid knows what lunch table has the bullies. When it's matters of life/death/power imbalances, there is a moral obligation to sound the alarm on that table.

But no cops ever seem to call out the psychopaths with guns amongst them. And in a position of power, that is just as bad.

One bad apple spoils the whole bunch.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 10 points 6 months ago

But no cops ever seem to call out the psychopaths with guns amongst them. And in a position of power, that is just as bad.

load more comments (37 replies)
[-] thedaemon 54 points 6 months ago

Holy shit, this was because someone reported her mom for not wearing a freaking helmet!?!?!

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

To be fair, she is black. /s

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 49 points 6 months ago

"A teen said"

"filmed" interaction.

Seems like there's more than "a teen's" word to go on. There's video evidence.

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 15 points 6 months ago

Fuck that headline.

"Deputy caught on camera threatening teenager while arresting his mother. Jury awarded the victims $185,000"

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So this is how our money is spent, wiping the butt of some power-trip cops. No wonder why we cannot get free education.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Where's my fucking money?

I got physically restrained and jailed after filming the police who searched my house without authorisation or a warrant.

But I live in Finland where everyone is a bootlicker and no-one cares about the cops being authoritarian as fuck.

"Personal freedom" is probably considered some kind of an exotic dessert by most Finns.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
597 points (99.7% liked)

News

23409 readers
2871 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS