555
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago

Discovered during the Manhattan Project, these ‘waterproof’ chemicals bind to every living thing’s cells with only bad results. 3M knew since the late 70’s and has continued to manufacture enough to contaminate all the freshwater on Earth.

In April, the EPA took two historic steps to reduce exposure to PFAS. It said that PFOS and PFOA are “likely to cause cancer” and that no level of either chemical is considered safe; it deemed them hazardous substances under the Superfund law, increasing the government’s power to force polluters to clean them up. The agency also set limits for six PFAS in drinking water. In a few years, when the EPA begins enforcing the new regulations, local utilities will be required to test their water and remove any amount of PFOS or PFOA which exceeds four parts per trillion — the equivalent of one drop dissolved in several Olympic swimming pools. 3M has produced enough PFOS and chemicals that degrade into PFOS to exceed this level in all of the freshwater on earth. Meanwhile, many other PFAS continue to be used, and companies are still developing new ones. Thousands of the compounds have been produced; the Department of Defense still depends on many for use in explosives, semiconductors, cleaning fluids and batteries. PFAS can be found in nonstick cookware, guitar strings, dental floss, makeup, hand sanitizer, brake fluid, ski wax, fishing lines and countless other products.

[-] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

Recently, 3M settled the lawsuit filed by cities and towns with polluted water. It will pay up to $12.5 billion to cover the costs of filtering out PFAS, depending on how many water systems need the chemicals removed. The settlement, however, doesn’t approach the scale of the problem. At least 45% of U.S. tap water is estimated to contain one or more forever chemicals, and one drinking water expert told me that the cost of removing them all would likely reach $100 billion.

$100 billion? Seems low. That's only five renovations to JFK.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

100 billion wouldn't even cover the firefighting foam pfas cleanup at jfk

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

An amazing article. You really should take the time to read it.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Propublica does good work on the whole.

[-] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the push, well worth it. Solid investigative journalism. The Jim Johnson section did make my blood pressure rise, let's be honest though: it's probably just my PFAS.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

No, I’m with you, that was very much Situation Normal All excuse-me??

[-] Clanket@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I was about to skip it. Brilliant article, and thank you to that woman for helping bring this to everyone's attention. It's unbelievable what some people are willing to do to make money. Fuck them, and anyone else that facilitates it by hiding secrets like this.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was really um . . . let’s say amazed . . by the CEO’s reaction to her presentation. Very . . . yeah.

[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

All secrecy is stealing, all corporations are criminal

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Dark Waters is a good movie about forever chemicals

this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
555 points (99.1% liked)

News

21821 readers
5267 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS