212
submitted 6 months ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/news@lemmy.world
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 130 points 6 months ago

And the market shrinks again... soon we'll be back where we started, with one telecom company.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 77 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've said it before, and I will say it again: the endgame of a capitalist system are monopolies or cartels.

Usually it takes the following steps:

  1. Bunch of little start-up - everyone wants a piece of the pie

  2. Some start-ups can't hack it and either go under or are absorbed by other start-ups

  3. Surviving start-ups grow to mid-size of major sized ventures depending on how many competitors or competitor market shares they absorbed

  4. Repeat step 2 with remainder of companies until a few are left

Presto changeo you got yourself a cartel or monopoly. Consumer power is nil.

Example sectors to look at for this: food production industry, mining, computing/silicon Valley

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Silicon Valley. Silicone Valley would be something... different. You might find that in Nevada someplace, around Las Vegas.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

While I am roasting you in this meme, you legit had a good catch. Thanks for that. Autocorrect, I guess.

I'm just pointing out Cunningham's law lol. Never fails

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

eli5:

Multiplayer Katamari Damacy. Last one standing wins.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 6 months ago

checks

https://www.statista.com/statistics/199359/market-share-of-wireless-carriers-in-the-us-by-subscriptions/

U.S. Cellular is tiny, and of the Big Three, T-Mobile is the smallest. AT&T is about the size of T-Mobile and Verizon combined.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago

My third point covers this

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

if att is so big why do they seem to suck so much?

[-] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 months ago

Because they can?

[-] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

I wonder if there's an inverse relationship between an institution's size versus its competency.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

AT&T is about the size of T-Mobile and Verizon

So, AT&T, the Deutsche tel / pacNWBell fka AT&T Frankenstein, and Bell Atlantic fka AT&T

They're all AT&T except for the part of Pac NW Bell AT&T that got bought by, essentially, German AT&T.

I want to believe they don't collude and perform, but I've lived in Canada and seen the decades-long dance between Rogers(fka Shaw fka AGTel + BCTel) and Rogers(Rogers) before they became just Rogers.

And now I'm sure that was all founded on a sugar empire.

But our major players have been dancing around each other for a long time before one bought the other -- and I'm sure it's just to save on Green Fees at the club because it's not one corporate rate.

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

100% true. Capitalist firms will always be motivated to get the most people possible, to pay as much as possible, for as little as possible.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

In 2, there's generally no difference whether they go under or not. If they had anything valuable when they went under, it's absorbed by a competitor. Machines, labor, etc.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Once the ladder's pulled then it's the Purge

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

The challenge is the startup costs and retaining skilled help. The only folks with the resources to cover these costs do so with the expectation of selling the company for more money, a long term investment for the investor. Gathering these resources without the expectation of selling or being the one buying others is probably untried and hugely difficult.

[-] Monument 37 points 6 months ago

Good thing T-Mobile just upped my bill, so they can afford to buy up their competitors!
Can’t wait until it’s only 3 companies that just charge the most they can possibly charge.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

Have you MET Canada?

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago

Hey, this is America. Why stop at 3? With Verizon purposely not spending the capex to build out their 4G/5G networks to match what their old 3G network could do, they and T-Mobile can merge to "compete against AT&T (now the largest network by square miles in the US thanks to the FirstNet spend) on some made up reason" before you know it.

Why not one carrier? For national security or some other flim flam excuse.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Same, since when is it ok for phone carriers to just raise the mobile bills? Oh wait it's 2024, and now it's normal for this shit. Seriously going to start looking at another carrier now. Don't want their Go5G bs plan, so they will now jack my rates to force me to move to it? Fucking leaches

[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 months ago

T mobiles service has been degrading since they acquired Sprint. I imagine this will only make it worse.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As a Google Fi customer, I have noticed this. I bought into Fi because in my neck of the woods, T-Mo tended to cover Sprint's gaps, and vice versa, and Fi used both. So while the process of switching between them was sometimes glitchy, I could get coverage anywhere in town. Now, it seems they might have turned off Sprint's towers here, believing that T-Mo has them covered, so I am out of signal in some places.

I also bought into Fi for the free international roaming, and it's still the cheapest plan for that if you don't mind being billed by the Gb. But I don't travel as much internationally now as before the Pandemic. But if Fi continues to not work in many places they might force me out.

[-] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 7 points 6 months ago

T-Mobile never intended to use Sprints infrastructure. They wanted the rights to their 5g midrange spectrum. As a previous sprint user, post acquisition I lost signal everywhere in my county because t mobile isn’t there. Had to switch to Verizon as AT&T had zero coverage too.

The coverage maps say there is coverage, but there isn’t. Hell, even Verizon is spotty there but it’s better than it was on the other two.

[-] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

I've had issues with fi, like having strong 5G signal but extremely slow data rates. Only thing that keeps me from switching is the $50 month for 2 lines.

I'm also concerned that dialing 911 may not work. Once I tried calling the state patrol hotline (*CSP in Colorado)to report an aggressive driver and the call would not connect. I contacted Fi support and they were not helpful and suggested I try "testing" a call to 911.

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 1 points 6 months ago

Currently 3 lines @ $120 monthly family plan. Called to switch to two lines but it would be more expensive. Fuck T-Mobile

[-] ares35@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

tmobile (and sprint when it existed) and att suck around here. they are only built-up along the interstate. verizon (through acquisitions) and uscc were the legacy cellular providers. towers everywhere, in every small town and every other farm field in between. it'll make tmobile better here, but at the expense of higher prices across-the-board with one less player in a game with far too few left.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 6 months ago

Another monopoly. Celebrate everyone

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 months ago

att still exists, duopoly not monopoly

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago

Give them time, they'll merge.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Why merge when they can pretend to compete and work together to raise their prices?

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

Well we have to give off the appearance so the ilk wont come after us.

[-] scottabing@real.lemmy.fan 13 points 6 months ago

I’m not sad to see US Cellular dissolve. Their assets will be put to better use by an actual national carrier with an actual national footprint. I was always hoping Sprint and US Cellular would merge for a 4th national carrier but obviously that ship has sailed with T-Mobile acquiring Sprint a few years ago.

[-] fpslem@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

I don't love the consolidation in this industry, but I know the big draw was the spectrum US Cellular holds.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

They just bought Mint Mobile as well. They need to be broken up!

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

What the fuck! I am a US Cellular customer and hate T mobile after they fucked me over years ago. This bullshit. Us Cellular great for those who can't always pay on the due date. They will give you extensions..T mobile does not fuck them.

[-] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Just hoping the white Sox don't rename to t mobile like how every Canadian arena is called rogers

this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
212 points (99.5% liked)

News

23440 readers
4368 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS