78
submitted 2 months ago by Boozilla@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 61 points 2 months ago

Raises prices by $1, lower them by $0.25 a year later, and if you own all major media, they'll tell people it's something to celebrate while ignoring prices are still arbitrarily inflated.

[-] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

My strategy with taxes in SimCity 2000

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I assume this is not a benevolent action, but a gimmick to get people back to spending more.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

Your assumption appears to be correct. They even state they want to break consumers out of the frugal habit (paraphrasing).

People are broke, you dumb twats.

[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

And we're learning how to frugal better, therefore buying less in the future too. I do not feel sorry for the shareholders.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They are delicious with BBQ sauce!

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

"People are broke, you dumb twats."

I want to make this into a billboard that we lease right outside the CEO of walgreens office window.

Then I want to send him a T-Shirt with this on it.

And then a custom doormat to put outside his house.

..................how hard would it be to tattoo it on his forehead without him noticing until after we're done/gone? I don't even want him to know we've been there.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

stick poking meme

cmon, buy something

[-] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Want us to spend more money and buy more crap? Simple, pay us more and we spend more. I used to spend $20 a week on lunches and $10 a week on coffee and muffin for breakfast, I stopped when it was $20 a week for coffee/muffin and $30+ for lunch. If my minimum spending on my basics is leaving me with less each month, I am going to start cutting back on even that. I guess if you want a cut of my money you need to find a way to get more out of my LL cause that is where most of it goes now, or the utilities. Something, something, blood from a stone.

[-] visor841@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Even if it wasn't a gimmick, it still wouldn't be benevolent. Corporations only lower prices when they think the lower price can make them more money overall.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

Let's stop calling it price cutting and calling it what it really is- degouging.

[-] dmtalon@infosec.pub 32 points 2 months ago

Slightly less gouging

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

The only reason they're doing this is because they realized they'll make more money by lowering prices. Do not mistake this as good will.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I'm going to use fake numbers here for the sake of simplicity to explain a concept of what just happened.

2020 absolutely had inflation from multiple different reasons. But......most of those reasons were temporary, which have now resolved.

So, here's where those fake numbers come in.

Lets say 2019 prices were around a 5% inflation. There is no covid. It's the last year of normal life. Stores aren't going crazy.

2020 comes, all hell breaks loose. Actual inflation is now at 13%. But stores are trying to figure out how to stay alive. So they charge as if we're at 22% inflation. This massive jump makes consumers buy considerably less. Spend more currency, but buy less product.

The end result is these companies made record profits selling less.

And then the work shortages caught up. The shipping shortages caught up. The microchip production resumed. And that temporary actual inflation fell. But because our country has never had a situation where inflation might fall, stores have just kept charging that 22% inflation prices, even though they're paying maybe 7% inflation now. A realistic jump considering everything thats happened.

Meanwhile consumers are seeing gatoraide shrink from 32 to 28 oz, and instead of charging $1.25 for it, it's being sold for $3. And consumers are saying "I'M NOT PAYING MORE TO GET LESS!"

And so stores are probably going to drop that $3 to $1.75. You're still paying more and getting less, but that $3 price is in your mind now so you think you're paying a normal fair price, rather than getting ripped off compared to 5 years ago.

So instead of charging 22%, now the artificial inflation is at 16% while actual inflation is 13%. They're still ripping you off, but now they want to continue to rip you off. Can't rip you off if you buy nothing.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

This is what's actually meant by the "invisible hand." They pushed prices past what the market was willing to bear, and lost sales as people made do without. Now they're adjusting prices back down, because it makes more sense to accept a smaller margin and make it up in volume. It's a textbook example of the demand curve in action.

When market-based systems work, they work fairly elegantly. It's the cases where they break down that I get concerned with.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When Walgreens cuts prices, it’s usually shrinkflation. They often have deals on paper towels and toilet paper — but when you look at the sheet count, it’s about half of what you would get on the same roll at a grocery store.

Same for fluid ounces on things like dish and laundry soap.

[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

OMG. Just got burned by Walgreens by this. Went to buy eyedrops. The name brand was out, so I bought the Walgreens brand. Same size box, slightly over the (out of stock brand) price. Got home, opened the box… I’ve never seen a bottle of eyedrops so small. Normal bottle is 0.25 oz. This one was 0.08 oz.

Fuck Walgreens.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Eyedrops are ungodly expensive. If you can wait a day or two, Amazon will usually ship a two pack for less than a single one from Walgreens or CVS. No one can justify $19 for a single goddamn bottle of eyedrops.

[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That’s what I wound up doing. Purchased the name-brand drops (full-size) for 1/2 od what Walgreens wanted. F Walgreens.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

And it's absurd what they charge for things like batteries, compared to other places.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Commence deflation.

Corporations caused it to go up, now they must cause it to go down.

This could get ugly. Guess what everyone, if we keep not shopping, they'll do it again!

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Fine by me. I gotta buy one pair of jeans, and after that my pockets are going to sound like somebody torturing Aberaham Lincoln. Because I'm pinching pennys REAL HARD.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Make it so Doritos are back to being ~$3 per bag instead of $6+.

[-] mihnt@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Holy shit yes. Even the local brands around here are ridiculous.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I thought I found a bargain the other day because they had this big thing of tortilla chips for only $2! Wow!

And then I got home and the bag was about 1/3 filled with chips. I forgot to check the weight versus a normal bag. I got swindled.

[-] mihnt@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

My store is $8.79 for the family size bag.......which I assume we're talking about.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
78 points (90.6% liked)

News

22470 readers
4693 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS