296
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] corroded@lemmy.world 194 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Microsoft knows that the addition of adds to Windows, Recall, data mining, etc are not suicide. As far as tech news goes, Lemmy really exists in an echo chamber. The vast majority of us at least have some interest in technology. For the majority of the population, though, this isn't true. The typical person sees a computer as a tool to be used for other things. They're not reading articles about the latest release of Windows, new CPU technology, the latest GPU, etc. They're using their computer, and when it's time for an upgrade, they buy whatever suits their needs.

If I was to ask any of my family, or most of my coworkers, about any of the latest "controversies" surrounding Microsoft, they would have no idea what I was talking about. Microsoft obviously thinks that the added profits gained by monetizing their customers will offset the loss of 1% of their users that switch to Linux. They're probably right, too.

I like Windows, personally (well, Windows 10 at least). My unofficial rule has always been if it needs a GUI, then it runs Windows, otherwise, it runs Linux as a headless machine. Once Windows 10 is no longer a viable option, my unofficial rule will be "it runs Linux." Most people will not make this switch.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 52 points 6 months ago

But you’re ignoring the entire enterprise side of things. MS Recall + pervasive data mining and ad injections are things that the vast majority of IT departments are going to refuse to sign off on. These technologies meaningfully and fundamentally undermine organizational and system security, up to and including potential inadvertent exposure of cryptographic secrets, which the modern internet is basically built on top of.

Sure, consumers are likely going to acquiesce out of either laziness or ignorance. But IT orgs aren’t going to simply sign off on this - particularly if they’re operating in an industry where InfoSec really matters (basically, any regulated industry like medical, biotech, or aerospace).

[-] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There is a huge corporate insensitive that everyone is not realizing here. By screen recording + OCR, there is a possibility to start using this data to replace some labor intensive, but simple tasks of operating a business. If you can create RPA+ML+LLM that can rerun repetitive tasks, you have holy grail on your hands. I think this is one of the big reason why M$ is pushing this.

I assume to be down voted to oblivion, but I do business automation and integration for living, and at the same time I am scared and excited.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Absolutely. Corporations - at least, shitty ones (most of them) - are absolutely salivating at using this. They want to be able to see and easily summarize eeeeeeverything you're doing.

Some are absolutely already using a form of this. It's not a hypothetical - this is currently happening and many want way way more.

Lmao do you have any idea how quickly that’s going to go off the rails? They’re going to get into a hallucination feedback loop, which will destroy the integrity of their systems and processes, and they’ll richly deserve it.

At any rate, most highly-effective technical teams have already automated the shit out of all their rote operations without using ML.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 6 months ago

Automation suites exist and they are very much tuned to the individual apps. It seems giving ML an OCR readout of a page is not enough for it to know what it should do (accurately). We have had a training set for "booking flights on a browser" for about 6 years now and no one has figured out how to have it disrupt automated testing: https://miniwob.farama.org/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago

They'll just keep it shut off. It's not a requirement.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

Will they not have licenses with all of this shit stripped out? Maybe another way to force ITs to pay for proper licensing and stuff too 🧐

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

That's partially true. The non-tech-savvy friends and family though need us to fix their Windows machines more or less constantly, and at some point we're not going to.

For me it was about 10 years ago when I forced everyone on to Mac at gunpoint just because I couldn't do Windows any.more. And even then it was another 6 years of explaining the differences in macOS and troubleshooting "office". Now when a friend's co-worker has a "computer problem" (read: Windows) I just say ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and I gotta tell ya it's friggin sweet.

[-] Papergeist@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

That's always been my policy. I never used apples so I gave a big 'ol shrug if that's what needed fixing.

Once I get more comfortable with Linux, I'll be giving the same shrug to windows troubleshooting.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Daily use of Linux & MacOS is virtually identical. Same terminal commands. Similar file system standards. You have homebrew as a package manager on MacOS. You use whatever comes with your distro on Linux (dnf, apt-get, I forget the arch Linux one. Yaort? Yum?)

Really I see no reason for anyone to stay on Windows. You can play 99% of games on Linux these days. I'm not exaggerating, it's very specific multi-player games that don't work.

Maybe if you use specific software for a niche industry or purpose then it's worth having Linux. But even in those cases, you can just use a VM.

That's what I do on my MacBook pro. I have a VM with windows just to run a specific program a couple times a week.

On my desktop at home I just use Linux and have for the last 10 years or so

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 133 points 6 months ago

The problem with big companies like Microsoft, EA, Ubisoft, etc is that once all the smart & creative people have gone, all you have left are the "line must always go up" business idiots, who have no idea what their company even does or how to fix it.

CoPilot / Recall is exactly the kind of End-stage, "let's screw our customers to death" idea the CEOs come up with before just their company implodes. Seriously. No one at Microsoft has thought this through beyond "data mining our customers."

How are other governments going to react to this? Will they trust their nation's secrets to an OS with such a blatant backdoor built into it? How does this "feature" work with search warrant requests? How secure can a database connected to an always-on Internet connection possibly be?

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 127 points 6 months ago

I've thought this ever since Windows 8 (and when I went from dual-boot to Linux only). In retrospect, at least Ballmer treated Windows like a PC operating system.

Ever since Nadella took over, it seems like MS is trying to turn Windows into ChromeOS but for Microsoft's cloud services. Pretty sure they want PCs to be thin clients tied to subscriptions. No fucking thanks.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You know it's bad when ballmer seems to be the rational person

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Windows 8! Haha! Ahh, I'd call it the "New Coke" of Windows but that probably wouldn't help anyone who wasn't there.

[-] Talaraine@fedia.io 71 points 6 months ago

I've seen this over and over in corporate environments.

Suit A has a terrible idea but enough fawning bootlickers to get the process moving.

Worker A, an employee, knows this is a terrible idea but doesn't say anything because they wanna keep their job.

Contractor B, obv a contractor, is there to make money and hopefully turn their stint into something more, so they speak up. And get canned.

What is it about Suits that they can't listen to literally anyone but their own echo chambers? Oh yeah, they're angling to jump into a bigger echo chamber. The 1%.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I'm Worker A, and I speak up when I get asked to implement something terrible. Sometimes it works, but usually they don't care. At least I don't lose my job over it.

I can't imagine working in a place where you have to be in fear of speaking the truth. I have never suffered negative consequences at any company I've worked at for pointing out why a terrible idea is terrible, but I've seen plenty of people who are afraid to speak up. It puzzles me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 69 points 6 months ago

No they’re simply trying to emulate Google and Facebook by becoming data gatherers and hoarders. They’ve been jealous of how much data other companies have gathered about people, and then realized they could easily do the same.

[-] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think you might be bit underestimating how much data Microsoft actually already has. They have just being better of keeping it to them self. MS from these three is the only one who is not an ad company, so they don't have to sell the data to 3rd parties to be profitable. They can just hoard the data, bit like Amazon+AWS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 44 points 6 months ago

The new Recall feature they're trying to push is creepy as fuck. No thanks.

Glad I moved to linux a few years ago so I don't have to worry about any of this trash.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The HIPAA concerns are very alarming. And I agree with the spirit if the article. However, I'm not sure the article is correct when it says Recall cannot be disabled. I've already seen other articles telling you how to turn it off. The fact that it's opt-out and not opt-in is a huge issue, though.

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Actually it is more than a local problem. Since Recall shipped with opt-out, means every computer will have this enabled. Even if you truned it off, the computer on the other end may still capture your data.

Say you said something here, regret about and delete it, but right before a user have Recall enabled see it and can just dig out your now deleted comment. Not good. This applies to HIPAA data or not.

This is essentailly a local search engine that index everything you see and others said in near real time, without repecting robots.txt.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Yes, that is also a big problem. In general you should be very aware in online meetings / screen sharing to be very cautious and deliberate with what you show. That problem has burned a streamer or two. :) Having a boring vanilla "work machine" for that sort of thing is always a good idea. Windows Recall definitely makes this problem worse! You could be doing 100% legit professional 'work stuff' and it could still grab things that it shouldn't (HIPAA and many other potentially sensitive bits of corporate data).

If you disable it, make sure to check on it regularly, as MS loves to turn things back on "for you" after Windows updates run. I've already seen some sysadmins saying they will run a scheduled task to make sure it stays dead.

[-] thisbenzingring 18 points 6 months ago

The problem with it isn't that MS says it can be disabled, because like everything MS does it breaks its own rules constantly. I have worked in HIPAA environments and making systems block potential MS systems is a constant cat and mouse game only accomplished by firewall appliances that don't have MS software in them

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Microsoft makes its money with Azure and M365 licenses for enterprise customers now.
Windows as a consumer operating system is a loss leader. The only reason it still exists is to breed familiarity with the MS ecosystem in all future employees.
This strategy works until a certain amount of really big businesses do the math and find out how many millions they can save each month by throwing their weight behind a Linux-based solution. Luckily for Microsoft, most CEOs and CTOs of these major corporations are forced by the shareholders to prioritize short term profit.
Rebuilding your infra and retraining your entire staff on a new ecosystem would be really expensive in the short term, even if it pays off in 5-10 years. And a high one-time cost is always harder to justify than a monthly amount that's already budgeted into your operating costs and product prices.
So it's still safer to stick to what you know, for now.

By the way, MS hasn't been fighting against Linux for a long time.
They're among the top contributers to the kernel, integrated Linux into Windows as a subsystem, run their own Azure backend on Linux servers, and post help articles on how to install Linux.

[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 21 points 6 months ago

Microsoft has essentially forgotten what a desktop GUI is for. It's a program launcher packaged with a set of libraries that make it easy for other programs to do complex things like displaying video in a uniform way, plus some system administration tools. Pack-ins not related to system administration should be limited to very basic software.

There may be something that Microsoft has added to Windows lately that isn't bloat, or evil, or both, but damned if I know what it is.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

They haven't forgotten. They don't care.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Because CoPilot+ is purportedly trained on what users actually do, it looked plausible to someone in marketing at Microsoft that it could deliver on "help the users get stuff done". Unfortunately, human beings assume that LLMs are sentient and understand the questions they're asked, rather than being unthinking statistical models that cough up the highest probability answer-shaped object generated in response to any prompt, regardless of whether it's a truthful answer or not.

Hehehe.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 months ago

There is no way this Recall feature doesn't backfire or gets breached.

[-] Noerttipertti@sopuli.xyz 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If couple reports are true, it is already breached and can be mined for info.
Edit: https://www.wired.com/story/total-recall-windows-recall-ai/

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Corporations must generate growth to please their investors no matter what. If the CEO doesn't do it the board members will replace him with someone who will.

Microsoft cannot significantly generate growth by increasing their user base by making a more attractive product anymore. They have maxed out their share of the market. So they must pursue other ways to generate "growth", like data mining their customers to generate an additional source of income.

In this kind of situation you will see all sorts undesirable behaviors emerge from corporations like that, like lowering the quality of their products or cutting down on their workforce to "reduce cost" event though they are already turning a profit.

We will see this shit happen over and over again until we come up with a solution to this "infinite growth" problem.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago

until we come up with a solution to this "infinite growth" problem.

This is why cancer research is so important. But for now, we can try the old standbys of surgical removal and full-system poison.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

No. Lots of normies will happily turn these new features on.

[-] lewdian69@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

I feel like the headline and all these comments have WAAAAAYYYYY too much faith in the technical savvy and/or privacy concerns of the average pc user. They are not committing suicide. They know that a very small minority will be upset by recall and AI but the vast majority don't know enough to care and definitely won't take the time to learn about why they should care.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 7 points 6 months ago

They are not committing suicide. They know that a very small minority will be upset by recall and AI but the vast majority don’t

run IT for big companies.

The small minority are those people. I do IT consulting and have contracts with several companies... We're road-mapped to remove windows from everything possible, we deal in PII and cannot risk any facet of microsoft's nonsense to collect it. And windows has a history of turning shit back on after being explicitly disabled. The business market is much larger than the general consumer market. And new workers who grow up in environments like businesses that work in Linux, will likely have had chromebooks in school. Meaning that Windows will not be defacto in those people's lives at all. This is shooting themselves in the foot (or possibly face) indeed.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

We're road-mapped to remove windows from everything possible, we deal in PII and cannot risk any facet of microsoft's nonsense to collect it.

Hey it only took til 2024 to get it on the roadmap! Hopefully complete by . . . 202. . . 7?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago

I think they are preparing to go full cloud soon. You can make much more when customers have to pay something like 29$ a month to use the operating system. At home or work there will be just a thin client left. And this recall database will be worth much more to harvest data when you have to store it on azure. I am sure this will come eventually. Storing it local is just the first step. Once the backslash is over and everyone is using it they will move the stuff to the cloud. "You will own nothing and be happy".

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Agreed, I see signs of this with on-premises Sharepoint and Exchange moving to a "subscription edition" for the next release. And then at some point years later they'll just say "we're not renewing subscription edition licenses, migrate to the cloud or else".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've been a user since Dos 5.0 and Windows 3.0.

Today I mostly use Linux Mint on my dual boot laptops and need to convert my main PC over to dual boot Mint next. I rarely boot into windows at home and if it wasn't for proprietary software at work running only on Windows I would have been done sooner.

I was mostly able to go from XP to 7 and avoided Vista and 8 altogether. Windows 10 was sort of ok with the ability to go back to a Windows 7 control panel when needed but it always felt half baked and unfinished to me.

I've just not been interested in 11 at all and the tidbits I'm hearing about Co-pilot reminds me of not only Clipit but the forcing of IE/ Edge constantly on user's especially after every larger update but to mention resetting the default PDF reader to edge. In a work environment of 20 plus shop PC's I was managing for low tech skill employees it was a pain in the ass chasing down the changes that were not made on my behalf.

What will be the Co-pilot's flavor of this new round of BS from Microsoft? The forcing of a cloud account is another headache I don't want to deal with either.

I will say Mint just mostly does what I need for my web browsing and general productivity needs without the constant game of trying to keep it the way I want it versus what MS wants for me with every update.

I'm at the stage of get off my lawn and screaming at a cloud in the sky next. That cloud is MS these days when adding in the annoyances of their Android keyboard *Swiftkey injecting Co-pilot and Bing into my searches. I've not played in Office 365 for a bit now but I can only imagine it's just as bad now.

[-] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago

I'm flummoxed for sure. I need a computer to be a bit of a power house, ideally well equipped for music production software and live performance, DJ software, graphic design/animation/illustration, and at least for the desktop gaming. Been in the market for a laptop so I can take at least the music & design production on the go, but damn I hate laptop shopping.

Unsuuuure if Linux is compatible with the graphic/music production software I'm working with, or if there are viable work arounds. Windows 11 looks like a dumpster fire I do not wish to support. I'd really like to avoid Apple as I have my own grievances there too. Windows 10 obviously seems on the way out.

Long story long, feeling a bit lost on how best to proceed. If anyone uses Linux for similar creative endeavors, would love to hear your roses and thorns on the matter. Certainly open to recommendations for a sturdy war horse of a lappy as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

They really are screwing it up. I’ve long been a proponent of dual booting. Yes I spend 99% of my time in linux, but I’ve always kept a windows drive going for the things that I’m just too lazy to get working. RGB lights, nicehash miner, exact audio copy, my aio cooler’s nzxt software for its blingy screen, the very off chance game that’s got a couple of glitches.

But like now, I don’t even want that OS on my PC. Even sitting on a drive that I hardly ever boot from. I view my password vault and it takes a screenshot of my credentials? Does it grab my bitcoin wallet too? At what point does windows 11 start scanning my local files simply because I booted the OS? When does it start scanning my other drives and OSs?

They just can’t be trusted anymore. And the fact that I’m actively solving the above mentioned pains in Linux and actively working to deleting the dual boot win11 os…. Well… when lazy people start doing work against you - you’ve screwed yourself.

[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Microsoft wants to lock up business dollars while the AI feeding frenzy is still fresh.

They do not care about any other markets or segments, which is why their products are getting so bad so fast for literally everyone else.

[-] geography082@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Global society is trying to commit suicide . It’s a normal behaviour when anyone gives a single fuck of common things. Everyone there is trying to make it and just leave . Most corporations is happening the same and I think is happening in societies too. There is nothing left to fight for in community.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I never thought I'd see one of Charlie's blogs posted around Lemmy unless it was about his books. Good to see him getting some recognition.

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

there’s no 5 year plan, it’s 5 one year plans in a trench coat.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
296 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

60108 readers
2416 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS