183

Sotomayor rips Thomas’s bump stocks ruling in scathing dissent read from bench (thehill.com)

submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 87 points 2 months ago

“Today, the Court puts bump stocks back in civilian hands. To do so, it casts aside Congress’s definition of ‘machinegun’ and seizes upon one that is inconsistent with the ordinary meaning of the statutory text and unsupported by context or purpose.”

“We conclude that [a] semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a ‘machinegun’ because it does not fire more than one shot ‘by a single function of the trigger"

“When I see a bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck,”

Ignoring reality in favor of weird essentialism to support your base, is like peak conservative. How dumb.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 41 points 2 months ago

Originalism is the legal equivalent of people picking and choosing single sentences out of religious texts out of context.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The term makes sense if you understand it is referring to the how the interpretation of the Constitution is brand new ("original") for each judgement.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Ignoring reality in favor of weird essentialism

Ignoring reality because Thomas likes to live like a billionaire and Alito hates gays.

[+] Dkarma@lemmy.world -54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

She's basically saying it's irrelevant that one trigger pull equals one bullet fired. That has nothing to do with "being a machine gun". That is just how semi auto guns work.

How would you outlaw this? You'd have to outlaw belt loops too because functionally they do the same thing.

Her argument is invalid. A goose walks like a duck and flaps like a duck and looks like a duck but it's not a fucking duck.

The idea that accessories like a pistol grip and stock choice and flash suppressor "make a gun into a machine gun" despite one bullet per trigger pull is simply not true and disingenuous.

Sotomayor should be ashamed. She's saying a dog is a duck if you glue on wings and webbed feet.

[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its not one per trigger pull, since the action of the machine results in another round firing unless you move your finger off the trigger.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The bump stock itself facilitates moving your finger so the trigger can reset. Pedantic, sure, but that's literally why the bump stock was designed that way. High rate of fire while not technically being an assault weapon.

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago

Geese do not look like ducks

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

If you cannot tell a goose apart from a duck you need to see an optometrist.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Found the pedantic gun nut.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That has nothing to do with "being a machine gun". That is just how semi auto guns work.

This sort of "X is X no matter what changes, it is always X" essentialist thinking is why conservites are increasingly getting frustrated and loosing touch with the more complex reality the rest of the world occupies. This is the same line of thinking that keeps y'all upset about trans rights and understanding systemic racist.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago

Anyone who's called an AR-15 an assault rifle in a thread about a school shooting knows about the pedantry of the gun lobby.

I'm amazed they didn't overthrow the law because it says "pull the trigger" instead of "squeeze the trigger."

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

Seriously there's no one more pedantic than gun enthusiasts.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

"Ohohohoho 'clipazine' hahahaha 'assault clipazine' hehehehehe you don't know what the vocabulary is therefore your argument is invalid."

Later, discussing women's healthcare:

"We cannot give out feminine sanitary products in schools, that will encourage women to have their periods during school hours instead of learning."

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

The ATF is.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hey I've got two machine guns on my feet watch out buddy edit link

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I have dozens hanging in my closet. I'm sure I could take you.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Grammar Nazis?

[-] el_twitto@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Just to be clear, for anyone that wasn't paying attention, the bump stock ban occurred under the Trump administration. All the second amendment people that think Trump has your back need to wake up.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 18 points 2 months ago

Normally I'd say something like "nothing will change until conservatives suffer personally", but lots of kids have been shot and that didn't do it. So I don't know man.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

[the sound of children screaming has been removed]

[-] PotatoKat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I honestly believe it was a mistake not releasing the footage with the screaming.

The fact that they were all standing around doing fuck all is bad, but you have to actively remember there are kids screaming. While mr punisher walpaper is pulling his phone out there are kids screaming. While they were all grouped together in the hall there are kids screaming.

Instead of having to actively place the sound you would have to actively ignore it like those shitbags in blue were. It would make their inaction all the more inexcusable. Release the edited footage so the news can play and so people who (understandably) can't stomach the sound can still watch it, but have the unedited footage to show how monsterously uncaring those subhumans were.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

It's AGAINST the Constitution for them to block people from showing up at the Supreme Court or Justices homes with Guns that fire like Machine Guns! I'm not Advocating anything I'm pointing out the Death Cult that is the Republican Party who would literally put ONE Nice Vacation over their Own Lives.

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024

183 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18601 readers

4305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News