93

It is not my intention to ignite an EMACS/vim war; I will say that I find it baffling that Lower Decks is ending while Strange New Worlds is being continued. I like Strange New Worlds, despite disagreeing with some of the artistic licenses being taken. But if I had to choose between the two shows, it'd be no contest. Not only as a viewer do I prefer LD, but it has to be the cheaper show to produce. The fact that next season is the last (both by design, it only being contracted for 5 years; and announcement) is sad and incomprehensible in the same way the cancelation of Firefly was - except LD is popular and successful, whereas Firefly merely had a fanatical (🖐️) fan base.

I don't understand it. Yes, you want to end on a high note. Maybe the writers are running out of plot ideas. Perhaps, given an initial life span of 5 years, the actors have all made other arrangements and aren't available. But I just can't believe the One Big Plot Arc that's been building would necessitate ending the series by its resolution.

LD is a strong show. It's lighthearted. It's a breath of fresh air after the more decidedly darker, ethically challenging, and emotionally straining runs of TNG, Voyager, DS9. And Strange New Worlds... the Gorn are basically Xenomorphs from the Alien franchise.Who, despite being the existential threat of the show, somehow get entirely forgotten about by the time in TOS.

But I digress. I'm going to miss Lower Decks, badly. How can this happen? And why?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I barely just got to watch the first season on Amazon Video as a Prime member. Someday I’m hoping the rest of the seasons will be included in Prime, because I’m not subscribing to Paramount.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While I understand and can appreciate your thought, I do admire shows who end on a high, instead of withering and ruining themselves from trying too hard. I think the show will go out on a high and will remembered and appreciated for a very long time.

It is sad though.

EMACS/vim war

Nano gang rise up!

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

While I agree with your logic, I don’t think that’s the reason they’re canceling it before the “traditional” seven seasons. I am betting that it’s because the Paramount beancounters are so far up their own ass about streaming metrics that they are unable to see that it’s built a cult following, which can be a very powerful tool if you use it the right way.

streaming networks pay close attention to how many hours shows are streamed, and the short runtime of Lower Decks may have sealed its fate.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 1 week ago

i feel that way about the it crowd

i desperately wanted more content, but realize how that would just tarnish the run. its still so re-watchable

sobs in Firefly

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Gravity Falls is another good example

o0o0 yes! i love that weird al had a part. ...such a wild ride

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 4 points 1 week ago

I bet they could have made like three more seasons. There is no shortage of nerd topics, stories from IT admins... I used to read those stories. And there are a lot of them that'd make it for a nice story arc for a 25min episode. And I mean there are also some american series depicting silicon valley programmers and stuff. I feel finding good content isn't an issue. But things also get lame for other reasons. And British TV series always end a few seasons too soon. They seem to do it differently than the Americans. Bediedict Cumberbatch also didn't return as Sherlock. And I would have definitely liked more The IT Crowd, Dirk Gently's, ...

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 18 points 1 week ago
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That is an easy way to learn vim!!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree with you. People need to remember that TOS had a terrible third season, ending with a bad final episode and TNG's final season had a lot of clunkers. And then there were the final episodes of Enterprise and Voyager.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Game of Thrones would have gone down in history as one of the greatest shows in history. Then the last season happened, and it's an almost forgotten show.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It will be forever hilarious to me just how the end of GoT wiped it from our collective consciousness. There were so many memes and references for years- Hodor, MUH KWEEN, Da king in da norf, R+L=J, "Winter is coming!"- and the second the last episode aired it just fucking vanished.

To your point though, I would argue that had the last season not happened, we would think of GoT as a great show that ended poorly due to the decline in quality for the last couple of seasons.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

For a more in context show, Baylon 5 had a great "last season" once the end of the show was rushed and a really lousy one after they decided to postpone the end by another year.

On the other hand we have Futurama.

[-] Exatron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You may be thinking of TNG's second season, which ended with the abysmal "Shades of Grey". The third season ended with "The Best of Both Worlds, Part 1"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] assembly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Calling on all four nano gang members…assemble!

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Funny enough, I think I liked LD because it felt closer in tone to 90s trek than modern trek. Like sure, those were serious shows, but in between the drama there was some pretty natural feeling levity based on character interactions, slice of life stuff, etc. Stuff that doesn’t take you out of the story, but gives you a breather and makes you care more about the characters when serious stuff does happen. Most of modern Trek feels like Marvel movies: End of the world level stakes and melodrama all the time, but constantly undercut with self-aware quips to keep things from ever being too sincere.

LD feels like a return to what I liked about those earlier shows: See the lives of some interesting characters in an interesting setting going on adventures. It’s not perfect and it’s not what I’d want to see entirely replace those old kinds of shows, but it stands in pretty stark contrast to the other new stuff.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago

100%. And the funny episodes feel forced. Like, everyone remembers the Trouble with Tribbles episode for the Tribbles, but they were almost a side story; there was an entire main plot revolving around the Klingons.

I agree. Maybe it's the audiences, maybe it's the studios, but your Marvel simile is apt.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 27 points 1 week ago

I think Lower Decks was always limited in how long it could run. They couldn't all be Harry Kim. They eventually will rank up. I think spin offs are the natural next step, so I really hope Paramount is onboard.

[-] themoken@startrek.website 14 points 1 week ago

I agree. LD is great, but it's also feeling like the story is nearing a logical endpoint. The main cast has already ranked up and learned to deal with their issues. It's only a matter of time before they're split up and I'd rather have the show deal with that directly and end conclusively while it's still a great show, than to last another 10 seasons.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

spin offs

Now there's an excellent idea!

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Star Fleet Academy show, but animated like Lower Decks!

[-] Lydia_K@startrek.website 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What I read is that the writers are sad it's ending so soon, they wanted to go for longer, but they are setting things up to be open for possible spin-offs, so maybe we'll get something new in the future in the same vein.

I agree that its wild paramount is canceling a successful, and very cheap to produce show, their entire business model as of late seems to be shooting themselves in the foot and then wondering why they keep losing blood.

Edit: clearly vim.

[-] ulkesh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

whereas Firefly merely had a fanatical (🖐️) fan base

Whereas if Fox hadn't royally screwed up Firefly's production and release, it would easily have been "popular and successful". Feels like apples and oranges to me.

However, I do agree that Lower Decks is a great show and cancellation makes little sense to me as well. But Strange New Worlds also is a great show, including the artistic license (which I'll be the one to say "Subspace Rhapsody" was amazing, I don't care what anyone says) and I'm happy it is continuing.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just thought Subspace Rhapsody was a bit boring, with too much "Look, it's this character, but singing!" and not enough actual Star Trek plot. When we only get 10 episodes a season, the plot of each one is very important, imo.

Other than that, I've mostly loved Strange New Worlds. The Lower Decks crossover especially. I love grapplers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

🎶 "Hail the Klingons, Uhura!" 🎶

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago
[-] _NetNomad@kbin.run 13 points 1 week ago

i love both shows but i don't think they're really comparable. LD is a very very very good spinoff but it can't be the tentpole Trek series, whereas SNW was more or less engineered to be that for this generation

[-] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I agree. Lower Decks is a great show in it's own rights and I know lots of people who like it without any previous experience in Star Trek, but it is very much a love letter to the series.

SNW is an outstanding show for first timers and a younger crowd. In a lot of ways, I kind of wish I could experience Trek with SNW as my first show.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

SNW hasn't had 5 seasons yet. LD will when this one is over. 5 seasons seems to be what Paramount is willing to give a Star Trek show.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

5 year mission.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 9 points 1 week ago

Please, can't we have just a little emacs/vim war?! :-P

Nvm, I will preemptively win it here:

img

For anyone interested in its history:

img

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 5 points 1 week ago

Good old xkcd - I knew this would show up, e eventually:-), though the concept has since been simplified:

img

Though I really like the look of this one:

img

And I'm not so sure about this one but there's a funny extension to programming:

img

Long live the wars - bc it means that we have so many great options to choose from!:-)

[-] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

You could just put "(with vim bindings)" after everything, including EMACS. I have them on in Firefox.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago

My objection is that this will cap LD at five seasons. It's seven for a trek series dammit.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

Eh 5 seasons these days is like two seasons of traditional Star Trek.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

There's less filler on the shorter seasons. Maybe 1.6 seasons?

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm going to miss LD, but I'd rather a show go out strong than with a whimper.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

I agree. I just fell like there were still places they could have gone with it. Apparently, even with promotions. Getting a half pip, or even a full one, doesn't necessarily automatically get you out of lower decks... and how fast do promotions come? Once every year or two - no faster, certainly.

And if we can have shows about the bridge crew, and shows about lower decks, we could certainly have shows about the in-between strata. An (original) Enterprise class had a crew of CA 400 people. Most of this didn't spend any time on the bridge; bridge crew was, what, 3 dozen people, max? The Ceritos is a California class; I've seen estimates of a crew compliment of 160. If we assume a max of 40 bridge crew (on rotation, with alternates), that leaves 120 people in other categories. Plenty of room for new assignments, duties, experiences; hell, except for re-assignments to other ships, they could drag the show out indefinitely. The bridge crew characters would take the most attrition.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 5 points 1 week ago

900% agree. And it's not like I could switch and watch The Orville instead for some occasionally lighthearted / funny / wholesome episodes. I think it's also not clear if they return at some point.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Paramount has been trying to get bought out by Skydance, so they've been cutting costs to make themselves look more attractive. They probably believe that the long term earning potential of the Star Trek property is in the SNW brand and not LD. I personally suspect that when SNW is over we'll see a rebooted TOS using the lore foundation SNW has laid. (Also I could be misremembering, but wasn't Balance of Terror supposed to have been the first time the Federation interacted with the Romulans in a long time? That would also be a contradiction created by SNW.)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
93 points (97.9% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3210 readers
1150 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS