222
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

Universal health care, 100% financial support once you reach federal retirement age, and you are legally required to retire from any federal position once you reach the social security retirement age. You can go do private industry stuff, but no federal jobs.

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

Private industry stuff

This is how you get lots of lobbyists.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

You know they can just do that now right?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

Not so fun fact:

Reagan appointed the first judge directly to the federal circuit court...

And she's still fucking sitting there at 97 years old

At 97, Newman is the oldest judge on the federal bench. She was appointed in 1984 by President Ronald Reagan and was the first judge appointed directly to the Federal Circuit.

Maybe we should cap it at like 100?

I mean. Ideally way younger, but it's insane there's no cap at all for a lifetime appointment.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Since the Supreme Court is full of Originalists now, let's think the way the farmers would have thought. When they wrote "lifetime appointments" into the Constitution, the average life expectancy for a male child at birth was 35 years. But that counts a lot of infant and child deaths, not to mention deaths due to military service. A man who managed to make it to 50 years old in 1789 would probably have at least 21 years left. Source

So, all lifetime appointments should be forced to retire at 71, because that's how long a lifetime appointment in 1789 would have lasted. Hey, Clarence, will you go along with my thorough analysis if I give you a "gratuity" afterwards?

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Ok, let's say 80.

"Yet the average lifespan of the 56 signers to the Declaration of Independence was 66 years, and a quarter of them (including Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Ben Franklin) lived to 80 or older."

https://populationeducation.org/sites/default/files/resource_files/SSYL%20article%20Jan%202013%20-%20Life%20Expectancy.pdf

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The average age of the signers, when they signed the DOI, was something like 26 or some really young age. Washington was practically venerable at like 40 or 45.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I don't think your example portrays originalism. They could have said "Until they reach the age of average life expectancy" then but instead went with life time appointments when in good behavior. A lifetime being serving until that judge dies, unless they've given up their seat.

To change lifetime appointments we'd need a constitutional amendment.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Your using logic and facts to drive your conclusions, though. You're supposed to do it the other way around: start with your conclusion, and cherry-pick facts to reach it. Once you learn that, you, too can be a Conservate SC Justice!

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Your example is actually much closer to Living Constitutionalism which based on this comment I'm going to assume you probably don't want to be criticizing.

Originalism is tethered to textualism which is antithetical to your analogy reading words out of text.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

FWIW judges in my Canadian province have mandatory retirement at age 75.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -1 points 1 month ago

Don't give your boomers any stupid idea bro

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Things work different up here, ie: judges are never elected - always appointed; our judiciary rules based on our Constitution, Charter of Rights and Freedoms and common law (not original intent or civil law [except Quebec]); and treaty rights for First Nations peoples (and sometimes Metis and Inuit).

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Newman was represented in the lawsuit by New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), a public-interest law firm linked to conservative backers that focuses on the so-called “administrative state.”

I doubt she appealed because she wanted to, she's too old and confused to care imo. But plenty of conservatives have incentives to get this through the courts so they can have more precedents to keep the geriatric government going.

For years people passed on the torch when they got old, but this shitty boomer generation feel like they're special

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

This is actually "silent" the generation ahead of boomers.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The boomers are refusing to take their turn, and refusing to allow any of us "kids" to step up and take on the responsibility for them. This particular "kid" is Gen X, and almost 44......

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 month ago

Wow, having to work untill you are 97?

Wow, that is horrific elder absuse!

Shame on you, USA, shame!

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Nobody is forcing this lady to keep working.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

That is kinda my point, this is self imposed elder abuse.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I expect she has a Wormtongue whispering in her ear the way Feinstein's aides were calling the shots

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 6 points 1 month ago

She doesn't want her job because she works... She wants because she is mentally ill abuser

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 12 points 1 month ago

Gereatric parasites just won't fucking die... This one is wasting judicial resources too as former judge.

Smells like a nepo baby tbh

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

People need to learn how to retire with dignity. Gtfo.

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i can't remember being Alzheimer so i am not // i can't come up with the idea i am senile so i am not 🤪

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
222 points (99.1% liked)

News

22470 readers
4775 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS