107
Do you understand
No. No she doesn't.
“Under stand? What? I am seated not standing” - person elected by, and to represent, conservatives.
conservative firebrand
This term is way too polite.
While "moronic asshole" is perfectly synonymous, that sort of language is frowned on in major publications.
Just stick with B^6^. It gets under her skin for sure.
I'm out of the loop on this one, vitamin B6? Banuary 6th?
I think it's a reference to Jasmine Crockett's "Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Body" comment indirectly directed at MTG. Although I don't think Boebert has ever bleached her hair. Her look is unique enough that she might be the exception and the one woman who doesn't have to bleach her hair to get her Fox Commentator gig after losing her seat.
Ah, the palin defence.
Firebrand is synonymous with radical. I think it’s an accurate description.
Maybe “radical conservative extremist” is more appropriate
"Conservative firebrand". I prefer "stupidity enthusiast".
It may not have the connotations to younger folk but "firebrand" absolutely isn't a compliment. It implies blind faith and a lack of comprehension.
Bernie Sanders absolutely isn't a "progressive firebrand" he's an advocate and a supporter but he knows what the fuck he's talking about and isn't just getting people relied up for the fuck of it.
No, she doesn't.
I love it when this idiot gets smacked down....
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
107 points (97.3% liked)
politics
18586 readers
4275 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS