117
submitted 1 month ago by mecfs@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17483630

They’re marketed as healthy, “dietitian-approved” meals and delivered directly to the homes of people seriously ill from cancer, diabetes, or heart disease: a Jimmy Dean frozen sausage breakfast sandwich, biscuits and gravy, a cheeseburger.

These are among the offerings sold by an Idaho-based company, Homestyle Direct, which is paid millions of dollars each year by taxpayer-funded state Medicaid programs to deliver what the company calls medically tailored meals. The company, which advertises delivering 7.8 million meals annually, has menus catering to customers trying to manage their cancer and diabetes, as well as “heart healthy” and “renal friendly” dishes.

However, multiple nutrition experts told STAT that many of Homestyle Direct’s offerings fall far short of what they’d consider medically tailored meals, a class of foods that have been proven to help those suffering from diet-related conditions improve their health and stay out of the hospital. Most also don’t appear to meet new voluntary accreditation standards crafted by medically-tailored meal providers.

Homestyle Direct to me doesn’t look like medically tailored meals at all — it doesn’t even look like generally healthy meals,” said Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food is Medicine Institute at Tufts University.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Let's shame Medicaid folks. I'm all for criticizing some things and behaviors but this really feels like a conservative dogwhistle attack. If someone who's receiving taxpayer funded food at home wants a cheeseburger now and then, I'm happy that my taxes are giving them some comfort.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought the article would be about that, but it's about the quality of the food. It's supposed to be healthy food for sick people, but it doesn't meet the standards. That's a problem for patients with conditions that require controlled diets like diabetes

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

How is that Medicaid's fault? Why isn't the title something like "Medicaid providers buying unhealthy food with federal funds"

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 15 points 1 month ago

Because we don't name the criminals in this country. It is always stupid government... Or some shit.

It would be nice to know what corpo scam is doing this. Prolly same guy selling prison and "school" food

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The company is even listed in the summary, you don't even need to read the article.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -3 points 1 month ago

Well if you did the work, fucking name them here

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah I read the article too. I want to see the available options for each category. Hospitals offer food options in different categories that have a range of healthiness that seems questionable too. Then again, folks in hospitals under tremendous stress should be able to treat themselves time and again. I hope they improve their menu, don't get me wrong.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -3 points 1 month ago

Hospitals are ran as a scam tho... Not sure what point you are making here unless you are trying to support position that hospitals and vendors are stealing taxpayer money via over priced and subpar products...

If food is shit and price is high... Who gets the difference in value?

Asking for a friend

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Because it’s prescribed, it’s approved by Medicaid. If they approved eating grass as a treatment for thyroid cancer, I’d also be pissed. People trust their healthcare system to help them, because not everyone can be an expert. So it’s reasonable to expect Medicaid to only approve things for payment if they promote health. The cheeseburgers in question do not.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

STAT News is generally well respected for medical/research news. I think the point of the article is to criticise the company for not making better foods/medicaid for not choosing a better company.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Unfortunately, I will not be at all surprised if right-wing outlets take that headline and run with it as a general criticism of Medicaid.

It's an irresponsible way to word a headline if they want to avoid that.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

This entire comment thread is based off someone who clearly thought this was just some sort of food subsidy program and not nutrition based... so I totally agree it will be taken wrong.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

in that sense, agreed

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -3 points 1 month ago

So because of bad PR we should not criticize corruption?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I didn't even imply such a thing, so I have no idea where you got that from.

Are you under the bizarre impression that there is no article, just a headline?

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -1 points 1 month ago

I will not be at all surprised if right-wing outlets take that headline and run with it as a general criticism of Medicaid.

Your bigger concern here is what ring wing will do rather than the crime being committed.

If you don't mean that way, I apologies.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This is not about what is a bigger concern. I can't speak for you, but most people can be concerned about more than one thing. In my case, one of those things was that I feel, and others apparently agree, that it is a headline which will be used as anti-Medicaid propaganda.

Why that doesn't concern you, I don't know. It should considering how effective propaganda has been throughout pretty much all of human history.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Media bias is always anti governments and pro "free enterprise"

Good point tbh

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Right, but the title doesn't even mention a company. Why.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 1 month ago

Because in this here country we don't name the perp when they are part of the club.

This is a huge lesson in this question.

[-] Elextra@literature.cafe 20 points 1 month ago

Dirty!! They just presented their services to our hospital too and were excited that our patients were going to have their nutritional needs met.... Obviously not....will share this with hospital teams to have them further assess before using these services

[-] sar1n@infosec.pub 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The company is Homestyle Direct and here is their website https://www.homestyledirect.com/

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most corruption happens via government Procurement

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Public procurement is the government activity most vulnerable to waste, mismanagement and corruption. The financial interests at stake, the volume of transactions and the close interaction between public and private sectors in the award of public contracts all pose risks to integrity.

https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/integrity-in-public-procurement.html

Note that OECD is the official global regime propaganda

This is common sense to anyone living and working lol

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Many common sense notions are parroted without any research into whether or not they are categorically true. Some are apocryphal, others might be true. There is definitely a lot of waste and corruption in anything that is human endeavor, I can agree.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
117 points (95.3% liked)

News

22488 readers
5348 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS