127
submitted 1 month ago by genfood@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org

This map shows the percentage of the population aged 0-17 years. In order to be able to identify differences within countries, the map shows the differences at a regional level.

Source: Eurostat

Are you surprised how many or how few children there are in a region in Europe?

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 35 points 1 month ago

Interesting that you can almost see east and west germany on the map.

[-] 7EP6vuI@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago

please show me a similar statistical map where you can see no difference between east and west Germany :-( i think German reunification did not work out as intended, many mistakes were made...

[-] Dwayne@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

You can also clearly see the shapes of Saxony and Thuringia. But something is wrong in Oberfranken and Unterfranken...

[-] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org -3 points 1 month ago

Oh it sadly was intended that way. Nothing was united. It was just annexed and scolded.

[-] GoOnASteamTrain@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Aw when I saw Ireland, I was thinking the UK was on this map... then remembered the past half decade and got sad.

(I voted to stay a European 😔)

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wow, how come Italy and Portugal have so few?

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

I was wondering as well. The major factor seems to be immigration and both Italy and Portugal should have plenty of that.

[-] killingspark@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

At least for Italy it's probably related to the very low birthrates

[-] Visstix@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I did not see % and was surprised by the amount of 18+ 17 year olds.

[-] Puttaneska@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, it would be clearer if the % was after each category in the legend.

[-] RichieRich@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Watch out for the Saarland. Seems that people are older there than in the rest of South-West Germany. "Bienvenue chez les Ch’tis allemandes". gg

[-] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Interesting, in my part of Europe this coincides with developing and dynamic regions (a lot of employment, culture and progress).

Wonder if movement or birth rates affect the percentage the most?

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Perhaps both. Maybe people are both more likely to move to AND have children in areas they feel more physically and economically secure.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 4 points 1 month ago

So is this a map of retirement migration? Social and economic security? Long winters?

[-] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

You can see families moving to the suburbs around Prague and Budapest, and maybe in Luxemburg. It's strange this trend is reversed in Bucharest, Bratislava and and Berlin.

How come? Here in Budapest it's quite common for young families to move to the surrounding sleeping villages when their first child's birth. It seems it's not as common everywhere as I expected.

[-] milliams@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] genfood@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because the UK do not provide data to Eurostat, they usual just collect data from national statistic institutes. Furthermore, GB is neither a member of the EU nor the EFTA.

I read this kind of comment not the first time, and it annoys me a bit. It sounds almost always like an accusation, that the statistics is wrong, or someone likes to bully especially the UK.
The one to blame here are the British people and the British government, because they are responsible for their policies and politics and BREXIT.

The UK likes to cook their own soup, which they keep repeating very often in the last few years…

But I guess there is data available somewhere maybe one creates a map especially for the UK.

Source: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/WDN-20200127-1

[-] neshura@bookwormstory.social 9 points 1 month ago

seems to be an EU survey not a Europe survey

[-] milliams@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Then why are Switzerland and Norway there?

[-] neshura@bookwormstory.social 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good point, amendment: Seems to be a EU + EFTA (European Free Trade Agreement) survey not a Europe survey

[-] nawordar@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

What about old people aged 0-17 years old?

[-] nawordar@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

What about old people aged 0-17 years old?

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
127 points (95.7% liked)

Europe

1255 readers
541 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS