I find myself liking this guy more and more as I hear about him. Can't tell if he's a genuinely good person or if he's got a phenomenal PR team. Can't ever be too sure these days
Lifelong MN resident here. He's a good dude.
I’ve met him. He’s genuinely good.
I'm thinking a bit of both.
I read in another post, that they sold their family home when they moved into the governors mansion. And way under its current worth apparently.
They could have easily rented it out and become landlords, but didn't. They were like "We don't need this house. Let some other family have it."
Would you let him sleep on your couch?
I'd let him fuck my couch, and I'd keep it a secret like bros do.
fist bump
Yes.
Can he be the president instead? 🥺
Look at the wall. Notice someone missing?
I wouldn't hang that traitors photo up either.
It's just the Democratic presidents. No W, Bush I, etc.
So... None of the bad ones, then.
None of the really bad ones, I'd say.
My first guess is, that this photo is taken in some kind of democrat party building. They wouldn't hang up opposing presidents.
Oh shit lol. I didn't notice that.
Depends on the wall.
I’m sure the FBI has a “most wanted” wall somewhere.
Yay
The only thing I know against the guy is signing off on the Retreat Doctrine, which if there is a prosecutor dumb enough to enact it will almost certainly lose MN money.
Seems like a pretty good guy otherwise.
Does he have indices? Or did he meant those when saying stocks. Not having money in some indices is not very wise tbh.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News