399
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago

I find myself liking this guy more and more as I hear about him. Can't tell if he's a genuinely good person or if he's got a phenomenal PR team. Can't ever be too sure these days

[-] mr_sifl@lemmy.world 90 points 1 month ago

Lifelong MN resident here. He's a good dude.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago

I’ve met him. He’s genuinely good.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

I'm thinking a bit of both.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I read in another post, that they sold their family home when they moved into the governors mansion. And way under its current worth apparently.

They could have easily rented it out and become landlords, but didn't. They were like "We don't need this house. Let some other family have it."

[-] SGforce@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 month ago

Would you let him sleep on your couch?

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 41 points 1 month ago

I'd let him fuck my couch, and I'd keep it a secret like bros do.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago
[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago
[-] Username02@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Can he be the president instead? 🥺

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Look at the wall. Notice someone missing?

I wouldn't hang that traitors photo up either.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 23 points 1 month ago

It's just the Democratic presidents. No W, Bush I, etc.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

So... None of the bad ones, then.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

None of the really bad ones, I'd say.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

My first guess is, that this photo is taken in some kind of democrat party building. They wouldn't hang up opposing presidents.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Oh shit lol. I didn't notice that.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Depends on the wall.

I’m sure the FBI has a “most wanted” wall somewhere.

[-] tyjjtftjtfjrht@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago
[-] pyrflie@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

The only thing I know against the guy is signing off on the Retreat Doctrine, which if there is a prosecutor dumb enough to enact it will almost certainly lose MN money.

Seems like a pretty good guy otherwise.

[-] samokosik@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Does he have indices? Or did he meant those when saying stocks. Not having money in some indices is not very wise tbh.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
399 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18802 readers
5472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS