70
submitted 4 months ago by meldrik@lemmy.wtf to c/europe@feddit.org
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KasimirDD@feddit.org 75 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

sad German noises

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 21 points 4 months ago

Isn’t Germany still part of the EU?

This looks like there’s a rough inverse correlation between average temperature or hours of daylight and number of books read.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 months ago

The source is Eurostat, which states "no data available for Germany". Seems curious indeed

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240809-2

[-] KasimirDD@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago
[-] ahornsirup@feddit.org 9 points 4 months ago

Not in this context. Curious can have the same meaning as "kurios", as it does here.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

"who have read books"

Not even a quantity, but just "books". That means that an european average of nearly half the people do not read a single book in a year?

This is so foreign to me, I have trouble to comprehend.

[-] leisesprecher@feddit.org 19 points 4 months ago

Many people, especially in physically demanding jobs, which often coincide with low education, simply never got into books. They are simply not in their radar as a form of education or entertainment.

Which is kind of understandable. If day job and daily life already fill your time completely, you may just want to be numb in front of a TV.

Also, don't forget that many younger people don't read books that much, simply because they consume different media.

And a final note: look at what the bestselling books are. Cheap romance, crime and thriller crap. Reading those is intellectually nil. You might as well watch the daily soap opera.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 2 points 4 months ago

Also, don't forget that many younger people don't read books that much, simply because they consume different media.

Good point.

[-] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 4 months ago

That's true but (at least here in Sweden and among my friends and classmates) I think most people read at least occasionally. Personally, however I'm in the +10 category by a long shot

[-] muelltonne@feddit.org 6 points 4 months ago

It is even worse:

Between 20-25% of the European population is functionally illiterate. In other words: at least one citizen in five does not have the reading and writing skills they need for functioning in society, with all its consequences for education, employment, health care, welfare, social integration and political participation. ‘More than 73 million adults in the EU… do not have sufficient literacy levels to cope with the daily requirements of personal, social, and economic life’

https://blogs.fasos.maastrichtuniversity.nl/EUS2516/lowliteracyineurope/

So they are not just not reading any books, they literally can't read books.

[-] ede1998@feddit.org 7 points 4 months ago

I could not find info on how they get to 20-25% functionally illiterate. That seems way too high. 17% for Germany. Do you know how they define illiterate?

[-] ECB@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

It can vary depending on the context, but essentially it just means that you can only read/write at a fairly basic level.

For instance, imagine someone who reads at a 4th grade reading level. They can get through basic aspects of life, but get totally lost/overwhelmed if they are presented with anything more complex. For instance, they wouldn't be able to comprehend most official letters. (Thus is especially an issue in Germany since Amtsdeutsch seemingly tries to be intentionally complex....)

They are effectively locked out of most modern jobs, because they can't parse emails effectively or formulate a fitting reply.

It's also something that people are generally very self-conscious about and get pretty good at hiding.

[-] ede1998@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Interesting, thanks for clearing that up. Wouldn't have thought that this is so common but then again I'm living in a bubble where I mostly know well educated people.

[-] Tarogar@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago

"Functionally Illiterate" doesn't mean that those people can't read or write. But it does mean that they don't understand what the words even mean.

Or in other words. Just because you know how to do something doesn't mean that you understand how it works. Lots of people drive cars or use computers but many of them have no real understanding on how they actually work.

[-] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I'm in the US, it's crazy how many people don't read books.

[-] Twitches@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

More don't read, than do. I'm my opinion.

[-] Cliff@feddit.org 7 points 4 months ago

I guess this overall correlates pretty much with living conditions of the people in those countries?

[-] KestrelAlex@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Do they count audiobooks? Is it about consuming the content of the book or the delivery system?

[-] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago

So consuming text that is not in a book does not count as reading?

[-] Bonifratz@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

I don't think anybody claimed that?

[-] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 5 points 4 months ago

The title claims it is about "reading habits". The presented data is exclusively about books.

[-] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

"Less than 5 books" includes 0 books? Otherwise those stats are hard to believe.

[-] ECB@feddit.org 6 points 4 months ago

In that case every country would add up to 100%, since the top category is "10 books or more".

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

Europe

1670 readers
534 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS