660
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 121 points 3 months ago

Fun Fact: This section of Project 2025 was written by Christopher Miller.

You might know him from such things as “On January 5, Miller issued orders which prohibited deploying D.C. Guard members with weapons, helmets, body armor or riot control agents without his personal approval.”

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

That dude has a lot of forehead.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 96 points 3 months ago

I’m not opposed to a mandatory community service year upon turning 18, where a person who is physically and mentally able is required to spend 12 months PAID to work in a government organized community service program. This can help new adults gain new skills, create contacts, get references, and get off on the right foot financially.

But “military” is definitely not the right direction. IMO

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The problem is that just discriminates against lower and middle class people more than anything.

It is work experience that has no meaningful value for a career (especially if EVERYONE has it) that mostly just serves to delay when people start college/trade school/whatever. Which hurts their ability to "hit the ground running" because they need to relearn what little they retained from high school but also impacts lifelong learning rather significantly. Whereas anyone who can pay off a doctor to say they have flat feet or some other non "yucky" issue will skip it.

And also? It is more or less worthless for the military. For anything short of cannon fodder, a year is nowhere near enough time to train someone to be useful. Even room clearing (e.g. Rangers) needs significantly more training to be less likely to shoot friendlies than foes. A lot of the problems in the Ukraine war (on both sides, honestly) can be traced to this. A soldier who can do more than "hold the line" needs significant training.

And while I think a return to having a strong emphasis on civil engineering and infrastructure as public service would be a great idea... without an education that is basically just hard physical labor. So now we have even more kids starting with debilitating injuries before they even begin their "real" career.

[-] ansiz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Federal service is very broad though. Just consider ask the different Federal Agencies and the roles they fill.

For example, when I was in college I had a 6 month internship with the National Park Service doing trail maintenance for a national park. It serves me no purpose as a resume item but I look back on that time extremely fondly even though it was the hardest physical labor I've ever done. It was incredibly physical work with really 10+ miles of hiking every work day. The NPS across the US has an huge budgetary backlog of trail maintenance going back decades.

That all is just an example but I'm sure the NPS could make great use of thousands of young workers to improve our parks. Similarly, I'm sure across the board the Federal Agencies would have a vast multitude of roles for this Federal service, including working for the DoD but in non military roles. Most of the agencies would have vast amounts of work that isn't covered by their budgets so it just doesn't get done.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Federal service is very broad though. Just consider ask the different Federal Agencies and the roles they fill.

Exactly this. There are lots and lots and lots of jobs throughout the federal government (and states if we include them) that would be great to have people get exposed to. It would also give people a very real sense that government is not some airy-fairy thing that is just there to be bureaucratic and "steal" your taxes...

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 12 points 3 months ago

I hear your concerns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 27 points 3 months ago

I say force everyone to do a year of retail. That'll do wonders for compassion as a whole.

[-] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I have my doubts. In my experience, the absolute worst customers were the ones who wanted to lecture you because ~I used to work in retail.~ I think some people just suck.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

They used to work in retail when it wasn’t insane.

That’s like “I used to drink directly from the stream”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago

That is the sad truth.

Assholes are gonna asshole. If someone actually needs to work retail/service industry to know how much it sucks, they don't have any empathy to begin with. This isn't like "Wow, being a model or a pro wrestler is awesome" where people learn the reality of needing to maintain your body in a specific form while constantly traveling and being underpaid and so forth. NOTHING glorifies retail/service industry work.

So you mostly just get "Oh, I worked at a supermarket 40 years ago and my favorite thing to do was to walk around the parking lot to find carts. So I am really doing them a favor leaving the cart in the middle of a parking spot in 120F weather".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 8 points 3 months ago

Haha. I mean, you do have a point there.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 81 points 3 months ago

Cool, but we also take Finland's law about tuition: it's illegal to charge it.

No private schools. It's done wonders for their society because the rich people invest in the same schools as everyone else.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

We have private schools. But they just can't charge tuition.

[-] GenXLiberal@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Honestly asking - how are the private schools funded? From the government? Assuming at the same level as the public schools?

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

I think most have some sort of foundation behind them funding it. Government and municipalities give them most of the funding I think, part comes from fundraisers and the sort, part from investments. But the schools can't be run for profit and they can't make a profit, so they invest the money usually back into running the school or investments.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

Endless War is a Hallmark of Fascism. This will require a large number of cannon fodder.

[-] patacon_pisao@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Ask one of the schmucks advocating for this to be the first to enlist and I bet they’ll have some bullshit excuse as to why they can’t

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

Rich kids and those with bone spurs will be exempt.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago

Require all private schools that wish to have accreditation take a minimum of $10 and a maximum of $11 of federal dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

My school had us all take it at 16.

If you refused you had to go sit in the cafeteria by yourself and weren't allowed to even study. Just sit there with your eyes open not doing anything for like 4 hours.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fuck that’s awful. Were you in Idaho or something equally awful?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Pretty much, we're also talking about right after 9/11.

We had people signing delayed papers as soon as they turned 17 so they'd go to boot immediately after HS graduation.

It was a wild time.

[-] aniki@lemmings.world 11 points 3 months ago

They had us take it in the 90s in my high school but we quickly knew it was worth nothing so everyone tanked it on purpose. We were already weary of standardized testing and knew just what to ask the teachers.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Malicious compliance is always fun but way better in groups.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 41 points 3 months ago

My high school made everyone take the asvab. I must have scored well on it because the military was up my ass. I remember uniformed soldiers regularly ringing the bell and asking for me. I had zero interest in joining the armed services, but they kept coming. My mom started answering the door for me; yelling at them to get lost and leave us alone.

[-] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 26 points 3 months ago

bro you're saying this as a fun anecdote but i'm not from america and this is terrifying

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 16 points 3 months ago

Some additional context:

This was 99-00. There was no war. Both of my grandparents served in ww2 and Korea to gain US citizenship. My dad came up in the Vietnam era when all his friends were getting drafted (aka forced to go to war). He tried to enlist but was blind in one eye, so they didn't take him. My brother would have enlisted if it weren't for a really bad skateboarding injury.

If I were good at football, it would have been university coaches knocking on my door. I was good at something the military was interested in, so they tried to recruit me to enlist.

I was 18 on 9/11/01. And my first thought was that Bush would take us to war, I'd get drafted and I needed to plan my escape to Canada. This was scarier than being recruited. I just wanted to play my bass guitar and smoke my marijuana in peace.

[-] JayObey711@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Reddit was right. You are being gang stalked by the government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

We could start the first war fought by dropping rich people from drones!

No wait... dropping rich people on fire from drones. That's better. We might run out of rich people, but they will run out of rich people first!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dubiousx99@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

For those not familiar with it, it is an aptitude test that covers a wide range of topics. The results can be informational. Beware if you score well enough to fill a job in the army that is really understaffed, you will never get the recruiters to stop calling.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 18 points 3 months ago

I had all 3 branches showing up at my house and lying to my face to get me to join after my school made me take it.

You'd think they would realize that lying to someone who scored really high was a bad idea.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I wonder how low you have to score before the military doesn't bother to recruit you, because I had to take the ASBAV in high school and I just filled in bubbles at random since I had no interest in dying in Iraq. I still got a high enough score that recruiters kept bothering me for years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Tell me it’s a draft without telling me it’s a draft

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago

Time for someone in the know to start spreading some "How to fail the ASVAB miserably!" memes.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

It isn't hard...also, they will take you anyway, you would just be a bangbang.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

I have no idea what the test involves, but if that had been me, me and my friends would have tanked it and made the results useless.

[-] randompasta@lemmy.today 12 points 3 months ago

I took it in high school just to have some extra testing under my belt for some reason that made sense at the time. It was probably the easiest test that I'd taken all 4 years. They're not testing for who can be rocket surgeons, but for people who have practical smarts. There were a couple of questions where you were given a series of 10 connected gears and giving the rotation direction of the first had to predict the last. Yeah, not calculus.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
660 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2244 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS