171

What a difference two-and-a-half months make.

It was just late June when Donald Trump and Joe Biden faced off in the first presidential debate of the season. As it turns out, thanks to his disastrous performance, it was Biden’s last presidential debate ever.

Tomorrow is the second presidential debate, but it might as well be the first. Kamala Harris will be making her debate debut as a presidential candidate. She and Trump have never faced off before. Indeed, the two have never even met because Trump skipped the 2021 inauguration festivities after his failed coup attempt.

Debates are all about expectations and spin. The expectation for the June debate was that Biden would show Trump up for the blowhard he is, which is why the Biden campaign pushed for a debate so early in the election cycle. We all know how that worked out.

However, it’s hard to imagine that Harris isn’t in a much better position going into the debate than Trump is. For one thing, Trump can’t stop himself from vomiting his inner dialogue, which rightly disgusts a lot of voters. He digresses, he rambles, he struggles to put a coherent thought together. Biden’s poor performance was the spectacle at the last debate. This time out Trump won’t have that foil.

At the same time, Harris is used to arguing her case. After all, she was a prosecutor, where her job was to convince a jury. She knows how to lay out her argument and draw people into it. She knows that this time the voting public is her jury, and she will argue accordingly.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 109 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

His cult will claim he won the debate, even if he shits his pants and starts talking like a baby.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 months ago

"He shit his pants to make a point!"

"He says it like it really is, even if it's infantile!"

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Never forget that these are the exact kind of people that will shove a dildo up their ass live on stream to "own the libs"

[-] holycrap@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago
[-] 5too@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] anytimesoon@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

That was a very long article, so for anyone too lazy to click, here is the bit you're probably interested in:

But enough of all that vomit-inducing background on the Proud Boys. I’ll leave you with this. For all their hatred of marginalized groups and especially in consideration of all the vicious transphobic and homophobic attacks by its founder, Gavin McInnes, I’m still trying to figure out how he so readily, and more importantly – easily slid a big black dildo up his own a**, live on his internet talk show? McInnes deemed the moment as “owning the libs.”

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

I didn't need to know Trump's cup size.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 20 points 3 months ago
[-] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

The Mult will just go back to wearing diapers and carrying rattles at rallies and other events. Because, as they'd tell you, that's not weird at all. Now, tan suits, don't get them started.

[-] Cyyris@infosec.pub 15 points 3 months ago

Exactly this.

My mother continually defends that jackass every time I try and bring up how unhinged and nonsensical he sounds - such as when rambling about sharks, or Gettysburg.

"Oh sweetie, he's just kidding! He likes to joke and kid around!"

No...No mom, he's a deranged lunatic who can barely string together two coherent sentences.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

for someone who "tells it like it is," he sure does need a lot of people to interpret when he's "taken out of context" or "joking" or "locker room talk" or "alternative fact-ing" or any other bullshit to explain away his saying the quiet part out loud

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I like presidents who are serious

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

This is the point that non trump people don’t grok.

His supporters don’t care.

His Multists (totally stealing that from now on) won’t be swayed by data or any facts. They won’t That 1/3 of the population would vote for him even if they were being rounded up for the camps.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago

Convicted felon Donald Trump vs. Former prosecutor Kamala Harris.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 56 points 3 months ago

Please don’t leave out "known rapist”

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 months ago

Or twice impeached.

I genuinely still have no idea how we're still talking about this guy at all never mind considering electing him as president again. This fucking country is so monumentally stupid.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Or known fraud. How many civil cases for fraud has he been found at fault? Trump University, Trump Charities, tax fraud, etc.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Also: actual fucking traitor.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

i was going to suggest washed up failed reality tv wannabe, but nothing beats treasonous russian muppet

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

He does the same ( Heads I win, Tails you lose ) crap every 4 damn years. If he does not universally suck , he "won" if the MSM says he lost it's "rigged" . Classic behavior from narcissists and con-artists , who lots of time are one and the same.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

He should’ve been worried about debating Hillary. It didn’t matter. People have already made up their minds about who they are voting for.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

there are - astonishingly - a lot of undecided voters - especially those who would otherwise not have voted at all - as well as a lot of people i'm calling "Maybe-Not-Trumpers" who aren't gonna vote for Kamala, but just might be pushed into staying home rather than voting for Trump after finally being pushed too far by him and his politics. from polling i've seen over the last couple of weeks, these two groups makes up enough (esp in the surprise in-play swing states of FL and PA) that it could make a real difference for Kamala.

esp in FL and other states where cannabis and abortion are on the ballot (again, like FL), there's expected to be huge turnout from the left that could even swing the state. i'm not getting my hopes too high, but FL could go blue for the first time in 20 years this election, from top to bottom, president to senate to state house, even in some significant local elections. Desantis fucking blew it here for the GOP, and two decades of failures have changed a lot of voters' positions here.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Sorry. I don’t believe that. People who say they are “undecided” by this point are full of bullshit.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

you might think differently after watching this interview with Democratic nominee for the US Senate in Florida, Debbie Mucarsel-Powell

https://youtu.be/2RKCHycFmng?si=33PVhYh7vro7YvyU

[-] urquell@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

You are not wrong

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

The only value to come out of this is getting more sound bites of old man Trump to blast onto billboards and remind people to vote.

[-] esc27@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The "media" has spent the last week setting the bar so low that when Trump comes out hopped up on stimulants, nothing in the debate itself will matter, and he will get a huge boost from simply not appearing as old as Biden did.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Hes shitting his diaper

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
171 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS