211
submitted 3 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 74 points 3 weeks ago

Police def overdid it, but part of the problem might be that some people would prefer to pay the fine for speeding because it’s insignificant to them. This specific component of the legal system is broken because it treats the wealthy exactly the same as everyone else.

[-] Maven@lemmy.zip 65 points 3 weeks ago

Fines need to scale based on the wealth of the perpetrator. It should be an equal punishment for breaking the law.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 41 points 3 weeks ago

Also, you can just mail speeding fines to people, there's no reason to pull anyone over for that shit except to initiate a conflict.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 22 points 3 weeks ago

They use the pull over as opportunity to search for more offenses

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 33 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, as I said, to initiate conflict.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

They could have said “no problem sir, we’ll get this ticket to you right away” and then slow walked the whole process. Taking up hill’s time would have caused him more problems than anything else.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Over here speeding gets a fine and points on your license which when you hit the magic number you get your license revoked....

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Those points can almost always be negotiated down.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 56 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I have spent a couple years badmouthing this dude, but the police bodycam footage is pretty crazy. It's also crazy to me that a bunch of Miami cops would pull over one of the city's most well-known athletes and nobody was like "gee, maybe we shouldn't go so hard on this one, he's famous"

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 3 weeks ago

Thought process might well have been: "This is an uppity black man, we'd better show these types a lesson."

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing makes a a cop more upset than seeing a black man doing better than him. A LOT of poorer white ppl seeing any brown person doing better than them is upsetting. You only got in your position because your a diversity hire or Affirmative Action!

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 9 points 3 weeks ago

No normal citizen would roll up their window on the police. Give me a fucking break.

[-] lemmylurkaround@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Playing devil's advocate. He may just not have wanted some paparazzi taking a picture of him while being pulled over? You could see in the video where the cop decides he's going on a power trip instead of just doing his job

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brezel@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

so you are saying they should treat him differently because he is famous?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago

Cops should be aware that if they fuck around with a famous person, they will definitely find out how it feels to face serious charges.

I wish it was the same for us poor people, but it's not.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. I’m not saying the cops should do it, but you’d think they’d take a moment to pause before harassing literally one of the most famous men in their city. If that doesn’t make them reconsider their actions, just imagine what it’s like for everyone else. Tyreek Hill even made a comment about it in a post-game press conference, where he wondered what would’ve happened to someone else.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

No, the person is saying the cops should have been smarter. They didn't say, "the cops SHOULD HAVE done X." They said, "it's crazy that the cops DID do X."

[-] MelonYellow@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Excessive use of force by the cop who clearly wanted to escalate. Tyreek Hill also wasn't being smart in the way that was handled. We already know how paranoid and trigger happy law enforcement can be. People like to act tough on the internet, but I wouldn't DARE roll up tinted windows during a police stop knowing how shit could escalate. I'm trying to have them see my hands at all times. That's exactly the kind of shit that can happen when you're just trying to get home safe. Whatever it is, it's not worth it.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Tyreek Hill also wasn't being smart in the way that was handled.

Why is it that we have to cater to the ppl in the wrong? Give him his ticket and go. Plus there was already another officer before captain tiny dick showed up who confirmed he had no weapons in the car and according Hill keep the entire situation calm. Fuck him. You want respect you have to give respect

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] some_guy 14 points 3 weeks ago

Video shows that two motorcycle officers went after Hill after he appeared to speed past them at in his McLaren sports car on the roadway entering Hard Rock Stadium in light traffic — they later said they clocked him at 60 mph (97 kph). They turned on their lights and pulled Hill over. One knocked on the driver’s window and told him to put it down, which Hill did and handed him his driver’s license.

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

I am a huge police accountability buff. But also, law matters, and court rulings matter. If police order you out of your car for their safety (in the US), you have to comply. If you do not, they are authorized to use force to pull you out and almost never do that gently. Cops absolutely use excessive force all the time, so not doing things that specifically give them permission would be smart. Him rolling up his tinted windows and refusing to get out of the car are what made this happen.

[-] Tramort@programming.dev 47 points 3 weeks ago

They still need probably cause to force him out. They might have had it based on prior facts, but they might not have.

Cops are way past getting the benefit of the doubt from me

This looks like they were angry about an uppity black man.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

This. They cannot tell you to get out for speeding or some other minor offense. They need probable cause for that. Then while he was in handcuffs, one of these clowns punched him in the face.

We need to end qualified immunity and start jailing these authoritarian tyrants.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

This is wrong. Stop spreading misinformation. They can order you out of a car for nearly any reason. Safety being a primary stated purpose that has MASSIVE LEAWAY.

https://www.smithandeulo.com/can-police-order-passenger-out-of-car/?amp

https://defenseadvocates.com/can-police-make-you-get-out-of-your-car/

I can post these all day long. They’re everywhere. There is no excuse for people spreading this misinformation.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

However, all other instances outside of those enumerated above appear to be unlawful reasons for ordering a passenger out of the car. For example, if the stop is concluded and the cop wants to talk to you about an unrelated matter. This would be an unlawful seizure. The Mimms case made it clear that while an officer may order an individual out of the car for legitimate safety concerns, the officer is not entitled to ask a driver out of the vehicle in every single instance in which he wants to speak with the occupants. See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977).

That's literally you're own link. Pulling a driver over on the highway and asking them to step out and move to the shoulder grass is fine. Asking them to exit the car, on a side street is not a safety issue.

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

If they can't see in your vehicle, they can tell you to exit the vehicle. If you give off a hostile vibe they can tell you to exit the vehicle. Having overly dark tint creates a scenario where they cannot see what is going on inside the vehicle. I have seen cops pull out their guns and shout at people to get out of the car from 20 ft away because they couldn't see inside. I'm not saying that's the right response, I'm just saying that there are more court-accepted reasons that an officer can pull you out of your vehicle "for their safety".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe, and I'm just spitballing here, but maybe for a simple speeding offense they didn't need to drag him out of the car? Just because they are allowed to based on past court cases doesn't mean they should use that for every issue they see.

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

There are a lot of people who want to end qualified immunity and reform many realities of policing today. I am describing the reality today. There's a reason I say I'm interested in police accountability/transparency.

[-] crusty_baboon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

The time between them ordering him out of the car (not asking to roll down the window) and them forcing him out was a few seconds.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Nice to finally see someone who knows Penn v. Mimms out in the wild.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone here gobblin up this rich domestic abusers BS just because the other party is a cop 🙄

Keeping your heavily tinted window rolled down during a traffic stop is not an unreasonable request. Dude's driving a $300k car and acting like an asshole to someone just doing their job. gimme a break. There are actual instances of racist police overreach that we aren't paying enough attention to. This isn't one of them.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
211 points (96.9% liked)

News

23024 readers
4547 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS