131

Lawyers for Donald Trump on Thursday asked a federal judge in Washington to schedule an April 2026 trial for the former president, on federal charges that he allegedly sought to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They’re taking the “we’ll get him off by letting him die of natural causes” approach at trial scheduling.

[-] phx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

More like "another shot at the presidency so he can got off free and then some"

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago

Even the commentators about the Georgia case, with currently 19 defendants, are saying two years. This case has one defendant, and is much tighter than the GA case. And this request comes after Trump openly and publicly committed witness tampering against a witness in the GA grand jury, as well as casting aspersions on the judge for the DC case.

This is not a proposal in good faith, it only exists to create conflict that has to be dealt with, and I hope that Judge Chutkan calls that out.

[-] visak@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Nothing Trump has ever done has been in good faith.

They're proposing a ridiculous date expecting to "compromise" on after the election.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Judge rules on the date on 8/28, and she's made a point of saying any sillyness and nonsense will get it going faster, not slower.

It will definitely be a 2024 start date, but I don't see it finishing before the election.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Lol. Because saying January 20, 2025 would be too suspicious.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Here's hoping at least one of his trials starts January 5th or 8th, 2024. Sadly, 06 Jan 2024 is a saturday and lawyers don't work weekends.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

It’s nice to see that they can still have a sense of humor despite facing overwhelming odds.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 2 points 1 year ago

There's nothing funny about obstruction of justice.

[-] CobraChicken@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

You sound like a lot of fun

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah fam. These need to happen before the election. If dude gets within 10 million votes of the white house we will see violence. There is no other criminal cases in US HISTORY more important than the ones involving Trump.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Did you say 2023? September 2023? Okay, sure!

[-] flossdaily@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Well, if he's going to push it that far back, he's going to need to work out his court date with warden of whatever a Georgia State prison he's living in.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Aug 17 (Reuters) - Lawyers for Donald Trump on Thursday asked a federal judge in Washington to schedule an April 2026 trial for the former president, on federal charges that he allegedly sought to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

That requested date would place the trial after the November 2024 U.S. election, in which Trump is the front-runner for the Republican nomination.

"The public interest lies in justice and fair trial, not a rush to judgment," Trump's attorneys wrote on Thursday.

U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith, whose office is prosecuting the federal 2020 election case against Trump, last Thursday asked U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to schedule a trial to start on Jan. 2, 2024.

That date is two weeks before the first votes are cast in the 2024 Republican presidential primary.

A spokesperson for Smith on Thursday declined to comment beyond that earlier court filing.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago
[-] boydster@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Let him wait as long as he wants to wait. In detention though.

[-] loie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He has a right to a timely trial, just not too timely, ok?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

As has already been expressed in this very DC case, the right to a speedy trial applies not only to the defendant, but to the public, upon whose interest the charges were filed.

[-] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

HAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...umm, I mean, really?

Numb-nut chucklefucks, the lot of'em.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
131 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4350 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS