518
submitted 2 days ago by TAG@lemmy.world to c/boardgames@sopuli.xyz
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aramis87@fedia.io 109 points 2 days ago

lmao:

Is there some way I can force Elon Musk to pay $47 to Cards Against Humanity PAC?

Funny you should ask! If you’re a registered voter in PA, GA, NV, AZ, NC, WI, or MI, just type your name into this dumb website for his PAC, put “MuskIsDumb@cah.lol” as your referrer, and they'll be legally obligated to pay us $47. The more people who do this, the more Musk money we’ll get to un-fuck America. . If he doesn’t pay up, we’ll sue him again.

Edit: source page: https://www.apologize.lol/

[-] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago

How does that even work? I'm not in USA so I can't even access that page.

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 53 points 2 days ago

Musk put up a PAC that pays non-voters in swing states $47 to register to vote (because the next president will be #47). I'm not sure if he has restrictions on his thing, like maybe you have to live in a red area in a swing state or something. Anyway, I think CAH has set it up so you can redirect that money to them instead.

Last I heard, you weren't supposed to give people money to register to vote or promising to vote or anything like that, but trump was filmed giving out hundred dollar bills last week, musk is handing out money for registering, and now this. I'm not sure what's going on except everything's really fucked.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

you weren't supposed to give people money to register to vote or promising to vote or anything like that

It's also incredibly stupid. You have no way of tracking who someone votes for once they're in the booth. If I was in a swing state I'd be happy to take musk's cash and vote for Harris like I was always going to do.

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

This is why it's (sort of?) legal to do what they're doing: paying for someone to vote a specific way is illegal for sure. And paying someone to vote is also illegal. But I believe that paying someone to REGISTER to vote is legal so long as you do not actively restrict who can participate. It's also okay to pay someone to write down a plan on HOW to vote, and to pay someone to write shit on the internet.

So yeah. It's very borderline. But I think it technically passes muster

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I get it's a counter protest, and it's probably supposed to feel slimey and manipulative, but that's all I feel from it. I don't see some good side to this. I just see an overall destruction of our ideals.

It's a sad state of affairs when the jesters are the only ones left speaking the truth. Satire has become reality.

It's exhausting.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

It's bad for public schools to have religious officials as part of their staff. When The Stanic Temple does it the point isn't to have people say "it's okay when people we like do it" the point is to say "you guys are bending the rules? Okay, we'll bend them until they break to force you to put a stop to it."

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The difference is they follow the law to show it's absurd logical conclusions. This is just breaking the law as well. This is not the same.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They are literally asking people to post that this should be illegal.

Everyone is posting about getting paid for their apology. I did my part by getting a pack, and I want to post, too. What should I post?

You should post:

How is this not illegal??? Cards Against Humanity is PAYING people who didn't vote in 2020 to apologize, make a voting plan, and post #DonaldTrumpIsAHumanToilet—up to $100 for blue-leaning people in swing states. I helped by getting a 2024 Election Pack: www.Apologize.lol

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

make a voting plan

You keep glossing over that part. That's the problem part.

And literally nothing you posted corroborated your statement that they were asking people to state Trump/Elon's actions are illegal. "A human toilet" is what's used.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

I don't think you read my post.

They are directing people who are supporting CAH, to ask on social media "How is what CAH doing not illegal?"

They are directly saying "What we are doing right now is not illegal and really should be." If you read the page it is full of comments like "It's fucked up that we can do this."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TAG@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

How does the Musk part work? Musk launched a petition to pledge support for guns and free speech (I think that is what it is about, I did not read it nor understand how that is a petition). To AstroTurf support for the petition, he set up a referral code system. If you get a voter in a key state to sign the petition and say that you told the voter to sign, Musk's Super PAC will pay you $47.

Getting people to sign Musk's petition feels a bit wrong, even if the money is going to what CAH thinks is a good cause.

[-] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Man, USA politics are wild.

Boring dystopia moment

[-] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Open the link. "Half of Americans didn't vote in the last election". Me: that can't be right, let's fact check.

Oh, yeah, 150 mil voted, 150 didn't, but that's a 66% turnout. On top of that turnout is higher in the blue states. Oopsie. See the map. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_presidential_elections

--

now that I've read the whole PAC thing it also makes sense why it was started. The data is on their side.

[-] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago

I'm all in favor of getting people to vote, but it seems out of line to pay people to vote (or at least claim they're going to vote) for your party. Even if the other guys did it first, an eye for an eye makes the world blind.

[-] Masta_Chief@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

They say it shouldn't be legal. The first answer on the FAQ:

"Whats happening?

Cards Against Humanity is exploiting a legal loophole to pay America’s blue-leaning non-voters to (1) apologize for not voting last time, (2) walk us through a step-by-step plan of how they’d vote this time, and (3) post “Donald Trump is a human toilet” on social media. This whole thing should probably be illegal—so quick, give us your money before they change the law!"

The entire FAQ is worth a read, it's pretty funny

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure it's in reaction to Elon promising people who vote 47 dollars. You know, actually advertising to buy actual votes

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Well, the other side is doing it so they're doing it almost identically so if they get in trouble for it, Musk should too.

[-] subignition@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago

It's not asking for either of those things. The site's terms explain it pretty plainly:

We are running a promotion to encourage eligible voters in the November 5, 2024 General Election in the United States that were eligible but did not vote in the 2022 or 2020 general elections to apologize for not voting (the “Promotion”).

[...]

ii. Receive an Entry by completing the following process:

  1. Entering your phone number;
  2. Entering your name, state of residence, and email, or additional information if needed to verify whether you voted in the 2020 General Election;
  3. If you did not vote in the 2020 General Election, enter your apology for not voting;
  4. Create a voting plan for if you would vote this year;
  5. To receive the full benefit, post on social media that #DonaldTrumpIsAHumanToilet. Not posting on social media will result in a reduced Benefit.

iii. “Voting plan” refers to your receipt of and acknowledgment of information on how you could legally cast your ballot in the November 2024 General Election.

iv. We will not check, confirm, or in any way ensure that you actually vote or follow the voting plan that you made. Creating a voting plan is not in any way a pledge that you will actually vote, and the Benefit is in no way conditioned on voting, or pledging or promising to vote. VOTING, OR NOT VOTING, IN NO WAY IMPACTS ELIGIBILITY FOR THE BENEFIT, OR THE AMOUNT OF THE BENEFIT.

edit: formatting

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I agree. But it is a great example of why this is a shit idea that shouldn't be allowed in the first place which I wager is at least partly what they're going for

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Apparently it’s in response to Musk and Trump handing out money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 21 hours ago

Suck my ass.

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

New from J.D. Vance: Hillbilly firing a rifle into the air while balls deep in a squealing hog.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] atocci@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have a new pack of CAH ordered for the first time since I wanted a good jar of clamonnaise

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
518 points (95.3% liked)

Board Games

558 readers
313 users here now

Let's Play a Game! A place to discuss all things board game, regardless of genre. Everything from Scrabble and Catan to Ark Nova, 1830 and beyond is fair game!

Rules: -Play nicely with others here.

-Discussion should be at least somewhat related to board games and all that entails.

-Self-promotion is allowed within reason. Don't go overboard!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS