203
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Blaze@feddit.org to c/reddit@lemmy.world
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Well that seems better worded than much of reddit.

[-] Someplaceunknown@fedia.io 17 points 23 hours ago

Dead internet might be true

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

Something that nobody mentions when they talk about dead internet theory that I think should be talked about is that the worthless engagement trolls that are real people, really do not and should not count as real people. They're never going to give you worthwhile responses, they don't add anything to conversations. Unless they see an opportunity to pick a fight they're probably not even listening to you.

Therefore they're not really any different than an AI run account that's not going to acknowledge you. And in some ways they are much worse, despite being technically "real people".

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 123 points 1 day ago

AI comments under an AI generated article being inflated by AI account activity. Who even needs end users anymore? Its a perfectly autonomous system.

[-] Meltrax@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Ironically there used to be a subreddit for this.

It was intentionally meant to be view-only for humans, and the bots within it were named for and trained on other subreddits. So you have AdviceAnimalsBot, LinuxBot, GamingBot, AskRedditBot, GoneWildBot, etc. They would post on a rotation, emulating what users in their respective subreddits posted. They would all comment on each other's posts, emulating their respective subreddit's comments.

As an experiment it was actually really cool and fun to read through. It was also very clear that these were bots and you could identify which was which, and nothing was pretending to be a human for karma (there were no votes in the subreddit).

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I loved that one

[-] deus@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

You mean r/SubredditSimulator? I miss that place, it was funny as hell.

[-] Meltrax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah that was the one! I had forgotten the name. It was actually a really cool use of bots and a fun microcosm of how they interact with each other. From the perspective of like, a college AI research project, it was really interesting.

Kinda sucks that that is just the entire website now.

[-] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Guess Reddit liked the idea too and decided to expand on it, for profits

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago

Who even needs end users anymore?

Advertisers do, and if they ever wise up spez's house of cards will crumble.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

Advertisers don't need end users. They just need happy bosses willing to cover their salaries.

In that sense, the business marketing team and the Reddit "look at our bullshit numbers" team are on the same side of the field.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

Yep. As long as sales and marketing can point to some bullshit KPI metrics as having exceeded all their goals, they act like they are the ones who bring in the profit.

Nevermind no one is buying anything and no traffic is going to the website, that is a different profit center’s problem and certainly not the fault of the MBA losers.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

It's easy to bullshit engagement, it's tougher to bullshit click-through rates and sale conversion metrics. It will take time to identify patterns, but inevitably the data will begin to reflect the truth, that's when advertisers will break and move their money to more successful (organic) platforms.

At least this is what happens in a sane world, as for our reality who knows.

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

If they haven't figured it out by now they probably never will. After all fake engagement isn't a new thing, not by a long shot. They'll probably just make some excuse about banner blindness for why click-through rates are down, possibly trying to also justify more aggressive ads, and more spending.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Dead Internet been here since 2010 at least.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Be great when the bots permaban other bots.

[-] NoiseColor@startrek.website 33 points 1 day ago

If lemmy becomes just a bit more popular, the same thing will happen

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yep, and even worse. Lemmy has absolutely NO controls for quality and minimal moderation tools or capabilities. It's in a much worse position than Reddit.

If it's not already happening (And I think it is), it will.

[-] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 1 day ago

What tools are missing to moderate a LLM bot?

I am a mod, I receive a report from an user, check it and ban. All done with current tools we have.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago
[-] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 9 hours ago

This is how we did in reddit too.

I receive a report from an user, check it and ban

That's all manual effort currently. Someone has to report a problematic post, you have to manually look at it, manually decided if it should be removed, and manually remove it. I'm not the biggest fan of automatically removing content, but when someone posts 500 posts all at once that manual effort is a pain.

[-] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 9 hours ago

This is how we did in reddit too.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago

But what if Elon Musk makes 20.000 Lemmy accounts to give away free crypto?

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't be a Debbie Downer! Let's just bask in unenshitified communal discourse.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

That didn't take long.

[-] Donut@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

Is it? Or is one person claiming that?

[-] Blaze@feddit.org 20 points 1 day ago

Have a look yourself at the comment

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago

I can’t exactly put my finger on it, but every god damn thing ChatGPT spits out has the same cadence or structure. Something about how it lays out points and wraps it up, and its usage of commas, is so noticeable to me.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Hmm. As an overuser of commas myself, I better try to tone that down.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wouldn’t say it’s necessarily overuse of commas, it’s how it consistently uses them the same way in nearly every response. It’s something about the overall structure of what it spits out. I wish a linguist would pop in and break it down for me. It’s a combination of tone, tense, arrangement of the sentences, how the paragraphs are put together - all of it feels very samey to me, unless it’s prompted otherwise.

There’s only a few “styles” of sentences it spits out and to me, it seems quite obvious. Humans don’t write that consistently all the time, they’re messier.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Ok, good, that makes sense. I was getting worried for a minute.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I feel you. My thoughts often spill out that way, too.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 6 points 1 day ago

To me, ChatGPT always sounds like a high school freshman submitting a half-assed English paper.

Yep the same thing if you make it roleplay as characters in a conflict. It always tries to find middle ground and end it

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Lots of compound sentences. And a "tone" suitable for USA Today. At least, that's the vibe I get from ChatGPT.

[-] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Tbf I also form sentences like this when I'm not being a total bitch and dunking on fools.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

If you look closely you can tell it was typed with 6-finger hands

[-] jasep@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I understand this was posted in the Reddit community, but also...

Who cares? Let that cesspool die.

[-] jasep@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You're right. The answer: from c/all

[-] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 day ago

It is funny to watch.

[-] DempstersBox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Huh.

So in my 'frequently visited' list, very recently a link to chatGPT has populated.

I've poked at a few of the generative ai things, but only the actual chatgpt once, months ago, and have wondered if there's enough bullshit from reddit to give it enough dings to make the list.

Apparently so

[-] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago

I see your account is quite recent, so welcome here!

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
203 points (98.1% liked)

Reddit

17443 readers
344 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS