135

Once upon a time, Twitter was paradise for sex workers. We could post our thirst traps, network and build community with each other, find clients, and build a following. Then came the hateful algorithms with their dreaded shadowbans. Building a following became virtually impossible, and our posts were hidden from our actual followers who WANT TO SEE THEM BC THEY FOLLOW US! We tried to warn the masses that these tools would be weaponized against political dissenters, but predictably we were mostly ignored. (We’re trying to warn y’all about banking discrimination and the dangers of facial recognition technology too but that’s a subject for another post. Just know that they always test their hateful tech tools on us first, then roll them out for the respectables and normals.)

If you are interested in learning more about this, check out Hacking Hustling’s piece

Anyway, when Melon Husk bought Twitter, we knew it didn’t bode well, but some remained hopeful due to all his yapping about “free speech.” Of course things only got worse for us under Apartheid Clyde, but most of us have stayed because it remains one of the only platforms where you can post tit without catching a permaban for it.

I guess the Neo-Nazification of the platform culminating in the re-election of Trump with Elon’s help has finally pushed us over the edge, because there has been a huge migration over to BlueSky (aka LibSky.) Will it be better? Probably not. But for now, the shadowbans are minimal and fascists don’t appear to be tolerated so here we are.

Y’all may or may not realize it but sex workers tend to be at the forefront of new tech trends and innovations. When a new platform pops up, we’ll be there shortly with innovative new ways to sell hole. So I predict that LibSky may just take off.

TL;DR: if you post tit, they will come

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 54 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah there’s this switcheroo tech companies do where they establish an initial value/user base on the adult content side of their platform but then try to pull the rug out from under it once they’ve hit critical mass and want access to more prudish investors’ money (see: OnlyFans’ aborted attempt to cull the hardcore content from their site).

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago

This is definitely a thing, but I have a different take on OnlyFans in particular.

I don’t think they ever wanted to get porn off their platform. Unlike sites like Reddit and Twitter, they started as a porn site and they have always made all their money from porn. They really started raking it in during the height of COVID, and when the platform got huge, that started attracting unwanted attention from Big Banking. It’s difficult and expensive to maintain reliable credit card processing as an adult site because these big banks have very strict and ever-evolving puritanical rules about what types of content they’ll process payments for. Run afoul of these banks, lose the ability to process Visa and Mastercard, and your business is dead in the water.

By appearing to pivot away from hardcore content and aggressively promoting SFW creators, it’s easier to make the case to credit card companies that it’s not just a porn site.

OnlyFans makes an astronomical, disgusting amount of money. They know where their bread is buttered. It’s a soulless capitalist enterprise, they don’t give a shit about the “morality” or porn or anything else. Their only goal is to maximize profits, and every decision they make can and should be viewed through that lens. They don’t sell paid ads on their site so they don’t have to worry about advertisers pulling out the way sites like Reddit and Twitter do. Plus Reddit and Twitter were never making real money off adult content on their sites; we have always driven tons of traffic to their platforms but they don’t actually profit from our presence there beyond the traffic we bring, so it’s easy for them to discard us once the users are already there and invested. None of that is true for OnlyFans.

FWIW, this is not a popular take among my peers. Most seem to think OF is like the other tech companies that want to boot us once they get big enough. But I think there’s decent evidence that OF does not want to do that and will never do that. Not because they care about us or anything, but because our porn makes them hundreds of billions of dollars (probably.)

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

Hmmm, how do all the traditional porn sites avoid that issue? Do they have access to different processors? Or does the parasocial aspect mean OF has a lot of add-on services that blur the line between porn sex work and “sexual services” that the processors balk at?

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

The traditional porn sites also struggle to retain payment processors and pay exorbitant transaction fees (10%+)

There has been a big crackdown recently due to the rise of Christofascism

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 51 points 2 weeks ago

Your posts are funny and informative. Hope you stick around.

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 51 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks Bob Dole. Idk why my parents didn’t vote for you in the 90s

[-] Sulvor@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago

Lol fitting right in

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago

SWers struggles against censorship, banking discrimination, and a whole slew of other issues have been the front line of digital repression for decades. Worth looking up the SESTA/FOSTA disaster. It's a key example of how efforts to supress sex work are usually just fancy social murder.

[-] iie@hexbear.net 43 points 2 weeks ago

(We’re trying to warn y’all about banking discrimination and the dangers of facial recognition technology too but that’s a subject for another post. Just know that they always test their hateful tech tools on us first, then roll them out for the respectables and normals.)

I look forward to that post!

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 24 points 2 weeks ago

Ugh so much pressure! 😭 I have some very smart colleagues who have written pieces on these issues. I will try to compile a few in a post here soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 38 points 2 weeks ago

Oof. I have a bsky account I made a long time ago but I don't use it because the vibes over there are so rancid

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 36 points 2 weeks ago

It’s libbed up over there for sure, but membership has more than doubled in the past couple weeks so maybe there will be a shift or at least little enclaves of cool people, similar to Twitter.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

Weird left twitter started showing up in force a week or so ago. It's still rancid but at least when you're screaming at libs you're not screaming alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] newmou@hexbear.net 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Uhhh woah

Edit: This is not LibSky lol I’m just dumb

[-] newmou@hexbear.net 32 points 2 weeks ago

Wait a minute lmao this is not the same thing. This is a crypto thing

[-] buh@hexbear.net 42 points 2 weeks ago

bit idea: create a new shitcoin for every trendy new startup so people buy it thinking they're buying stonks-up

[-] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

If The Producers and Office Space came together for a crypto plot...

[-] newmou@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

How about we just create ShitCoin that mints more coins every time a trendy new startup launches and then burns coins whenever they fail

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

I heard it’s the number 1 free app in the app store right now, but haven’t bothered to confirm this.

[-] buh@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

It’s showing up as number 1 for me, Threads is 2

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago

Reminder than the term "blue sky" comes from the Blue Sky with White Sun flag of nationalist China. The Bluesky CEO's mom fled the country during the Cultural Revolution because she supported the KMT lol

[-] blight@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

ooooooooooooooh

toxic 2005 redditors were right!?“tits or gtfo”

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That one was a 4chan thing first I believe

Source: I was an insufferable 4chan dweeb in the mid 2000s

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 24 points 2 weeks ago

That was 100% a 4chan thing.

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

Can you elaborate? I didn’t even know Reddit existed back then

[-] blight@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

basically as soon as a woman showed up they would say “tits or gtfo” meaning she should post nudes or they would bully her. other comment is probably right it was 4chan first

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

Ah the joys of being a woman online! It’s either “tits or GTFO” or “OMG I saw a titty, will no one think of the children?!”

God forbid you want to make money off showing the tits, because that tends to piss off the “tits or GTFO” crowd for some reason 🧐

[-] DeathToBritain@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

I do wonder if this would move users over, or if SW will just relent and return to twitter as it has a much larger userbase. ofc if you're advertising a service, you want the most people to see it and be able to pay for it. Blue Sky has had huge migration waves before, it's topped the google app store before; a few weeks go by and people slowly walk on back to twitter over time due to the more active user base with an endless supply of content to doomscroll. the thing that gets me is. mastodon already exists, and does have a large established userbase, with sex work instances open to signups. BS is trying to be a secondary niche where others already exist. BS is also owned by corperate interests, publicly traded, and has shown crypto leanings in the past. they'll do some unadvised things in the long run too to maximise profits, and SW are a very easy target when that happens

I hope it works out for online SW, an ex girlfriend of mine used to do it as a side hustle and it did a lot to pay her bills. especially in worsening economic times like this, SW being forceably deplatformed is going to hurt working class people who need to pay every increasing bills

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Crowtee_Robot@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

Y’all may or may not realize it but sex workers tend to be at the forefront of new tech trends and innovations.

You can take my Betamax tapes and HD DVDs from my cold dead hands.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

I don't fault you for going where you gotta go, but I imagine that as bsky gains popularity, it will gain advertising, and it will start deplatforming accounts like yours. It is corporate social media after all. I'm not sure what a good alternative is though. In my early days on Mastodon, there was Switter, which seems like the right kind of model, but it collapsed for reasons I can't recall.

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I addressed this in another comment, but this will happen if Bluesky gets big enough. That’s just the joy of being a SW! But we’ll use it until we can’t. We’re very adaptable like that because we have to be.

The reason I thought it might be relevant here is that we are pretty much always early adopters, so often the masses tend to follow us, whether they’re aware of it or not. We’ve been on there for a year or so but this is the first really big migration that I’ve personally witnessed.

My opinion as to why Switter never really took off is that a SW-specific platform is too niche. Clients/customers didn’t really follow us over. It’s super difficult to get people to switch to new platforms; Emile Torres did a great episode of Kelly Hayes’ “Movement Memos” podcast about “switching costs,” why it’s so hard to move people to a new platform, and what platforms can do to mitigate those costs.

Also, Mastodon just seems a little too nerdy for the general public if I’m being honest 😬

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

I really appreciate your perspective on this stuff. I hadn't considered how SWerz would be on the cutting edge of privacy/security tech and concerns. I completely understand the nerd factor of the fediverse in general, but I can't help feeling like it is "the answer" to corporate controlled networks. Then again, I'm also aware of the inherent issue around "technical solutions to political problems".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bloubz@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

I thought you were talking about a new BlueSky instance called LibSky. I'm sure there'll be one (or there's already one)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

Do you still need an invite to join libsky?

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

No but you have to pledge undying fealty to Hildawg hillary-contempt

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

One of my most libbed up opinions: Twitter under Jack Dorsey was... probably about as "good" as one can expect from a privately run, "for profit" (on paper anyway. I don't think Twitter's model is ever profitable in and of itself) "general use" social media app and company.

Good is relative obviously compared to.... Twitter now with daily incantations from Mein Kampf being boosted to millions of viewers. Same goes for Facebook, Instagram (also "Meta" owned), YouTube comments, 99% of Reddit. If anyone or any company ever tries to actually abide by "both sides have extremes" it seemed to be Dorsey's goal. I don't agree with the goal for ideological and I'd argue moral reasons, but, he did ban the outright and obvious Nazis. The bar is in Hell here, but, libbed up opinion, "he was the lesser of the evils!" We finally found who should've been president...

And by general use I mean seeks to bring in a broad audience and isn't explicitly going to be favoring certain ideological viewpoints. Of course it still favored liberalism as that's the default "western" stance, to defend western governments and such, but again,... an attempt was made. It was imperfect, even "bad" most of the time, but the bar is deep inside Satan's rectum on this topic.

If we had tribunals for the creators, major investors and owners of these rancid platforms, and I were a judge (which obviously I would be 👀), I'd argue for leniency for Dorsey. Let him be a humble miner for the rest of his life. Musk, Zuckerberg, that Tom guy from MySpace... well... I am censored on their fates

This is the part where I've set myself up to have someone come in and inform me that Dorsey is a suspected serial murderer or some shit

[-] MouthyHooker@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

I agree. Dorsey’s Twitter was probably the best we’ll ever get. I’m sure he’s a piece of shit like the rest of them, but the golden days of Twitter were something else. We shall never see their like again 💔

[-] Des@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

i jumped ship the second Melon Ball melon-musk took over. sucks too because i had just started talking to some local leftists. one is a SW and they moved back nearby recently

might have to see if they moved over and check it out again.

[-] M68040@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Hell, half my friends for the past ten years have been adult artists of one sort or another. You don’t get into indie art of the sort I like without getting to know sex workers - and getting to understand why they’re important.

Long live the weird and wild.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
135 points (97.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13565 readers
745 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS