81

A week before the election, my dad was visiting and talked to me about his gut feeling that former President Donald Trump might win. He was clear about his choice to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris. “But what are they doing?” he asked me, exasperated.

“They need to level with people about the economy,” he continued. “I know so many people who can’t afford a place to live any more. People do not want to hear, ‘Well, actually the economy is good.’”

Then suddenly he pivoted away from Harris to liberals more generally, and away from the economy into culture.

“You know, another thing: I’m tired of feeling like I’m going to get jumped on for saying something wrong, for using the wrong words,” my dad confided, becoming uncharacteristically emotional. “I don’t want to say things that will offend anyone. I want to be respectful. But I think Trump is reaching a lot of people like me who didn’t learn a special way to talk at college and feel constantly talked down to by people who have.”

At 71 years old, my dad is still working full time, helping to run a delicatessen at a local farmers’ market. He didn’t go to college. Raised Mennonite and socially conservative, he is nonetheless open-minded and curious. When his cousins came out as gay in the 1980s, he accepted them for who they are.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Typical Boomer sentiment. "I never had to adapt or learn, despite having every opportunity, and now anytime someone doesn't cater to me, I'm offended."

Meanwhile Millennials have been riding an unceasing wave of technology advancement since elementary school, while learning all the fundamentals of Boomer educations, AND modern living AND adapting to changes in the information landscape and workplace. AND getting a significantly lower ROI for their efforts. Boomers broke the social contract. Their egg on the face bellyaching is just more evidence that the world has moved past them.

We need age caps on voting. These elderly chucklefucks are dragging us 100 years backwards.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Typical Boomer sentiment. “I never had to adapt or learn, despite having every opportunity, and now anytime someone doesn’t cater to me, I’m offended.”

Boomers shouldn't have to work at all. Our social safety net should be taking care of all of their needs, and it would be if our country were located somewhere in Europe. Instead, the US decided it would rather have 600-700 billionaires than take care of its people.

The bigger problem here, though, is that it's not just the Boomers. The vast majority of Americans are working their asses off only to barely survive in this country.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago

Who do you think set the stage? Baby Boomers voted for 50 years to only enrich themselves while pulling up every ladder they had for advancement. They are 100% the "fuck you, I got mine" mentality.

Of COURSE we should have social safety nets and a more enlightened society. The reason we do NOT is that a massive cohort of incredibly narcissistic personalities had control of the government for 50 years. And even now, many Boomers refuse to step down from their "leadership" positions. "Generation Me" has been remarkably consistent in their attitudes, for roughly 55 years.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 3 points 1 month ago

Our generation can’t retire. Why should boomers? Old people, who depredated this planet, should not have access to social security or any other safety nets, which they fought so hard to destroy.

[-] Jikiya@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Because the old people holding on to the top level jobs prevents other generations from getting a chance to control companies, and limits incomes. It's not about rewarding them further, it's about getting them out of jobs other people should now be working.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

So I'm interested in winning elections so that better people can have control of the vast power of the federal government.

Like it or not, these people- most people are the people we need to vote for our ticket, and we need to be listening to them and making adjustments, not saying "typical asshole, they shouldn't be allowed to vote!" Come on.

We can't have the electorate you'd like to have. These folks exist and will never hear your criticisms of them in this progressive silo. We cannot keep the government out of the hands of the MAGA people without their votes no matter how much you hold them in contempt.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We have two parties. TWO.
The GOP is obviously never coming to anyone's aid. You think the DNC is going to somehow morph into a team of winners? They're categorical losers. They're a party of neoliberal minds, insulated from the outcomes of their own failures.

Yes, I'd like other options, and yes, the electorate should be inclusive. But the party that determines who runs and the party that sets strategy, and the party that is supposed to be fighting for the common person, is NOT.

And many of those party heads are incredibly old and out of touch, and frankly, just in the way, as they manufacture reasons why they continually lose, yet simultaneously grow their own wealth and influence. The duopoly of being the brightest and best political minds is not congruent with being perennial losers. So they're just not trying to win. That is not their goal. They are there to gratify themselves, while losing.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

"the economy is the best it's ever been" for whom? I'm broke, worried about making rent and it's Christmas season. The only thing I have to give is my usual "humbug" attitude as I worry about how I am going to manage after the holidays.

The economy sucks. Businesses aren't people. They don't have to worry about eating. I do. They don't have to worry about missing a rent payment because they have credit. I don't have enough. The entire system is rigged and the Democrats keep ignoring us. I hated Harris when she ran for herself but I voted for her because I didn't want to lose my freedom - but with Dems it's some other loss of freedom no one talks about or admits exists. We are practically bound to our work, many people us identify as the job we have. "Oh hi Bob, what do you do?" Is boomer code for knowing what kind of respect to give a person. Democrats support losing our identity to the industry that employs us.

Business centric politics is hurting the people who are making the business run.

[-] whithom@discuss.online 8 points 1 month ago

Haha assuming there will be a next time. So optimistic.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Saw this on Al Jazeera and I think it's a fairly solid opinion. My parents are in their eighties and driving for DoorDash (in my car, on loan), and if they don't, no one in the Biden/Harris administration would lift a finger to help them, and they know it. I'm almost certain they voted Trump but we have a family rule where we don't talk about politics anymore.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Not talking about politics is what got us into this situation in the first place.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

No.

People making their entire identity political got us into this situation in the first place.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

lol, and just whom do you think that was?

Who is most likely to disseminate incorrect information? Who never bothers to verify facts? Who couldn't be arsed to apply critical thinking to the information presented?

Why do you think foreign agitators targeted Facebook in 2016 and beyond? It's because Baby Boomer rubes are the easiest targets available. Who voted for Brexit?

There's no critical thinking there, no challenging of statements. They just assume they'll fail upwards no matter what course of action they take, because for most of their lives that has been true.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

lol, and just whom do you think that was?

99% of voters.

Y'all clearly do not care about the quality of people you elect, judging by the effects of their governance. The world can burn and people can starve so long as the person in charge wears blue and says nice things.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

so long as the person in charge wears blue and says nice things.

Not to nitpick but, "blue no matter who" just specifies blue, not saying nice things. You are required to support without question.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ironically, people in the Biden/Harris administration are the only ones “lifting a finger” to help your parents.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You’re delusional. Or maybe a fascist. I’ve no idea.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’ve no idea.

I agree with you on that one-- that you have no idea what you are saying.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

Exactly. It’s hard to be sure whether someone is delusional or just a fascist.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

The wealthiest 10% own 93% of stocks. The wealthiest 1% own 50% of stocks.

When they say the economy is doing great, they literally mean they are fucking you in the ass, right now, in this moment, but you’ve lost all feeling down their and you are metaphorically more incontinent than Trump.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

People do not want to hear, ‘Well, actually the economy is good.’”

In four years these same people are going to line hearing that, regardless of reality.

It's not about the message. It's about the color of the team saying it. Red, orange, and white over blue, brown, and white.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I recognize that I'm likely part of the problem, but was there a lot of, "well, actually the economy is good"?

What I remember from the campaign (from my own limited media stream) is that Harris openly acknowledged that prices were too high, both for groceries and housing, and gave admittedly broad plans to address those challenges, e.g. home buyer credits, home building targets, and child tax credits. I'm not trying to be an asshole, but I legit didn't see this as the "abandonment of the working class" that has been the popular narrative recently.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
81 points (85.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

1209 readers
403 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS