140
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by micnd90@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Biden is a lame duck president with NO PUBLIC MANDATE and subterranean approval rating, he got ousted by his own party before the election for being mentally incapacitated, his defense against a Justice Department inquiry is he's too old and senile, his party just got BTFO in a national election. No NATO or NATO proxies have ever launched long range missiles into Russia in living memory. How is this guy brump fit for office

STOP EATING CRAYONS AND DO YOUR FUCKING JERB. "Senile old man sends young people to WW3 out of spite"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] perestroika@lemm.ee -2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'm copying this here from my other post in another community on another server, in belief that it might help people stay better informed. So, apologies for the duplicate (it has been edited and improved since the original), but:

  • Russia has been firing its own ballistic missiles into Ukraine since day one -> claims that firing ballistic missiles somehow escalates this conflict aren't well thought out

  • Ukraine has been firing ATACMS into "Russia" (occupied and annexed Crimea) for a good year already, without World War 3 breaking out

  • Ukraine has its own missiles too (mostly cruise, not ballistic, but they had at least a few dozen Soviet-made "Tochka" SRBMs) and they've been firing those at high value targets in Russia from day one of getting invaded, it's simply that their supplies of Tochka have almost entirely run out, and their home-grown missile industry is a big fat target for Russian attacks (despite which Ukraine produces missiles, but currently not ballistic missiles of a practically usable sort)

  • ATACMS is effective and practical, with a cluster warhead it has shown ability of taking out Russian air defense batteries (S-400 and such), which are difficult targets to attack

  • this time too, air defense failed to stop them and they caused secondary detonations at a large ammunition storage site

  • since Russia is still attempting to conquer Ukraine, now with added North Korean soldiers sent by their dictator, there continues to be plentiful ground for other countries to supply Ukraine with more advanced stuff to fire at the invaders, lest they invade more of Ukraine or start invading elsewhere

  • foreign ballistic missiles that Russia has fired into Ukraine include North Korean and Iranian missiles, so foreign-made BMs flying about is ordinary stuff in this war

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 52 minutes ago

Dafuq, are you unwell?

[-] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

now with added North Korean soldiers sent by their dictator

  1. Kim Jong Un is not a dictator. Again you show that you have no clue. Just vibes.

  2. No statement by the DPRK or Russia regarding the matter. You base your assessment on rumors spread by the ukrainian government. The ones who made up the Ghost of Kiev. Told the world that the seperatists were shelling themselves. That Russia shelled itself in a nuclear plant. That Russia had lost 500000 soldiers and was sending in human waves armed with shovels.

You never stopped and thought: "Wait, that is not a reliable source!"

Western press told you that was the truth, so you took their word for it. Because when was the last time the west lied? Aside from Iraq, Lybia, Syria, Xinjiang region, Vietnam, Korea, the USSR, China in general, Communism in general, Ukraine, Palestine, etc.

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 0 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

Kim Jong Un is not a dictator

He most definitely is a dictator. To be specific, he's a hereditary monarch. Let's start with who ruled before him - his father. Next, who ruled before his father - oh, it was his grandfather.

Let's have a closer look: what happened to his half-brother? Oh, poisoned with VX or something comparably toxic.

What happens to people who don't follow his orders? Well, shootings by a firing squad are common.

What happens to low-ranking people who are considered disloyal? Prison camps have a lot of them.

What happens if you consume South Korean TV series in his kingdom? Oh, executions.

Let's be real: Kim Jong Un is a full blown dictator in a full blown dicatorship.

[-] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 15 minutes ago

Bush and Trudeau confirmed dictators.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 5 hours ago

claims that firing ballistic missiles somehow escalates this conflict aren’t well thought out

It escalates the conflict because under Russian law it puts Russia directly at war with NATO and opens up more spheres of conflict. The Russians will most certainly retaliate, likely by sending weapons to anti-western groups.

without World War 3 breaking out

Yes, I doubt this will on its own cause ww3. But playing with fire is dangerous either way.

they’ve been firing those at high value targets in Russia from day one of getting invaded

Russia is already at ear with Ukraine. The Ukrainians firing at Russia with their own weapons is thus not an escalation.

since Russia is still attempting to conquer Ukraine

No it is not and it never was. Everybody knew from day 1 that conquering and holding to all of Ukraine would be infeasible and the war was actually about NATO expansion.

North Korean soldiers sent by their dictator

Pure ideology. Just speculation. It wouldn't even be an escalation if this were happening because the western fascists have been sending over their mercenaries and troops to Ukraine for the past 10 years.

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee -2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
since Russia is still attempting to conquer Ukraine

No it is not and it never was.

I find that doubtful. They went for Kyiv during the first month of war. If you go for the largest city and the capital, that typically is a conquest.

Just speculation.

For now, speculation - but multiple sources are indicating that North Koreans are there. Indeed, nobody has yet been captured or interviewed.

There have been videos of well-recognizable M-1978 Koksan self propelled guns being transported on Russian railways. There's no place to get them except North Korea, and the videos are possible to geolocate into Russia using architecture.

because the western fascists

The prevailing opinion seems to be that Ukraine was attacked by Russia in 2022 and before that, parts of Ukraine were seized by Russia in 2014. Up until the Kursk counterattack, there never was a case of Ukraine seizing parts of Russia. And in fact, before 2014, they had quite friendly relations, with Ukraine leasing military bases to Russia in Crimea, having given away (to Russia) its nuclear weapons, and such.

In my opinion, the essence of the situation are not some imaginary bunch of "western fascists". The problem is a man who's now sitting for decades in the Kremlin - Putin has gradually become a dictator and hard boiled imperialist (of the "make Russia great again" variety). He decided that Ukraine must be under Russia's control. The revolution which Yanukovich accidentally provoked was inconvenient to him, so he decided to start military action. Seeing that the West was using toothless sanctions and harsh words, he decided to go all in - but miscalculated. His yes-men said they could do it, but they couldn't.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 hours ago

I find that doubtful. They went for Kyiv during the first month of war. If you go for the largest city and the capital, that typically is a conquest.

Yes they went for Kiev to topple the government of Ukraine and force a quick surrender, as has been their stated aim. It does not mean there would be any possibility of conquering Ukraine and holding it by the Russians.

The prevailing opinion seems to be that Ukraine was attacked by Russia in 2022 and before that, parts of Ukraine were seized by Russia in 2014.

You appear to be forgetting about the maidan coup, the shelling of donbass and the arming of Ukraine by nato, all of which the Russians have said threaten their national security since Ukraine is literally at their border.

imaginary bunch of “western fascists”.

Y'all are commiting a livestreamed genocide in gaza and have slaughtered tens of millions of people at the altars of capitalism since the end of ww2. No need to imagine western fascism.

hard boiled imperialist

When will liberals learn what imperialism is? When we say "we oppose imperialism" we mean that we want to destroy the transnational system of capitalist superexploitation of the world's natural resources and labour by a handful of "first world" nations. Not "we want to reify nations and nation states".

He decided that Ukraine must be under Russia’s control.

As opposed to the Americans, who don't want Ukraine under American control, who haven't been buying up Ukrainian capital assets for dirt cheap for 30 years now.

The revolution which Yanukovich accidentally provoked was inconvenient to him, so he decided to start military action. Seeing that the West was using toothless sanctions and harsh words, he decided to go all in - but miscalculated. His yes-men said they could do it, but they couldn’t.

I bet my left testicle on you not having read even a single word that came out of the mouth of any member of the Russian leadership and instead just making up all of this headcannon and fan fiction based on nothing.

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

When will liberals learn what imperialism is?

I'm an anarchist. (I had the privilege of discussing the Maidan revolution with fellow anarchists as it was happening. Our comrades were involved, but had to keep their guard up, because some fellow rioters were far right. Regardless they participated, despite the riot police shooting live ammunition and some fellow rioters being stupid and dangerous.)

Imperialism... is conquering and dominating foreign lands and assembling empires. Unless you have noticed, Russia has never fully left this business - it's an empire that took over Siberia very much like the US took over North America. Nobody has complained as long as they stick to internationally recognized borders. Unfortunately, Putin revived the ghost of needing to be great and feared again.

...as for whether 2014 was a coup, revolution or some other thing - tens of thousands of civilians decided the outcome. That's a pretty revolutionary coup if you ask me.

The president of Ukraine fled to Russia but the parliament remained in place, and provided a way of triggering new presidential elections. By that time, Russian troops had taken control of Crimea and Russian specialists were running the insurrection in Donbas, with constant shipments of supplies from Russia, which would continue for 10 years.

That's the point where it landed on Obama's table and he was not prepared, but did damage control. In Ukraine, they elected Poroshenko as president and he entered the Minsk agreements with Putin - trying to freeze the conflict. The ceasefire did not hold for long, soon both sides were again exchanging small arms fire. Soon enough, heavy equipment was moved in and Russian troops in Donbas were shelling Ukrainians while Ukrainians were shelling them back.

Multiple attempts were made to negotiate something permanent, but they failed. Putin declared Crimea to be part of Russia and stated that he'd never give it back, meanwhile denying the presence of Russian troops in Donbas, which was a blatant lie. Meanwhile, Putin eliminated his opposition. Nemtsov was shot, Kara-Murza was poisoned, Navalny was poisoned, etc.

In the run-up to the full-scale war, Russia held large military maneuvers near Ukraine's border. As a feint, it ended the manevuers and claimed that troops would go home, but troops stayed. Troops themselves were not informed of their purpose, ending up ill prepared and confused.

Another round of theatre started: the "people's republics" of Donbas "applied" for membership in Russia and were "accepted". Russia made an ultimatiumg demanding NATO to abandon its recent members. NATO responded by starting to donate man-portable defensive weapons (antitank and anti-aircraft launchers) to Ukraine.

Then came the provocation phase. Lots of fake material was pushed onto social media during a few days, trying to construct a cause for war. Some of the videos were blindingly fake (e.g. some propagandist used the soundtrack of a Finnish military excercise for an alleged Ukrainian attack). Ukrainian troops had orders not to provoke, so Russia had to stage its own provocations. They did that sloppily. I had the privilege of paying full attention maybe a week before others became concerned.

Ultimately, bombardment of Ukraine started on the night between February 23 and 24. Attempts to land special troops started, and ordinary troops were pushed into Ukraine, some of them unaware of why the "excercise" had turned into a shooting war. Their logistics got jumbled and Ukraine still had ammunition for every barrel, which allowed them to be pushed back under Kyiv.

Currently, I have the doubtful privilege of living 200 km from St. Petersburg and understanding Russian pretty decently, so I can read their Telegram channels, from the opposition and the anarchists to the Z-bloggers and VDV.

Russia has not given up on its ambition of controlling Ukraine. Realistic people understand that they're unable to take it all, unable to take it currently - but the Kremlin gives commands to advance and constantly forms new units to send. A considerable part of the army is extremely frustrated with their bad supplies and leadership, but threat of extreme punishment keeps them going.

Ukrainians are meanwhile extremely tired and frustrated too. They just don't practise extreme punishments, but they have increasing trouble mobilizing soldiers. Volunteers are few, professional soldiers have mostly fallen (dead or wounded) and it's called-up reservists who are fighting now.

Foreign volunteers do exist on the Ukrainian side - there is the International Legion and the Freedom of Russia Legion. The former is considerable, the latter is too small to make a difference.

Y’all are commiting a livestreamed genocide in gaza

If you really want to know - when Hamas attacked Israel, I said that Israel has the right to defend itself. When Israel started bombing civilians, created a famine in Gaza and destroyed their infrastructure, I said: that's no longer self defense.

I have never donated to Israeli causes. But I have donated to Ukrainians and will continue to help them in the ways I can. I do not support every move they make, but they have a right to repel the invaders, and this incldues the right to strike across borders at the invader's command, logistics, storage and production.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 58 minutes ago

Maidan revolution

A revolution from capitalist neocolony to capitalist neocolony?

Imperialism… is conquering and dominating foreign lands and assembling empires.

Assembling empires is the only correct part of your definition, because it happens to be a tautological statement. How can you be an anarchist and use this definition of imperialism, since all states by definition dominate territory? "Foreign" and "domestic" are purely artificial categories and using them only legitimates statist ideology.

The president of Ukraine fled to Russia but the parliament remained in place, and provided a way of triggering new presidential elections. By that time, Russian troops had taken control of Crimea

The Russian annexation of crimea happened after the president fled, as a response to the coup.

Putin declared Crimea to be part of Russia and stated that he’d never give it back

This was done via referendum. As for the rest of your comment, it is mostly just a run down of the specific events leading up to the war, ignoring the geopolitical reasons for why the different actors took the actions they did, instead looking at the events in a vacuum.

If you really want to know - when Hamas attacked Israel, I said that Israel has the right to defend itself.

Am I right to assume that the previous 70 years of Israeli settler colonialism had no impact on your opinion of how much Israel has a "right to defend itself"?

they have a right to repel the invaders, and this incldues the right to strike across borders at the invader’s command, logistics, storage and production.

Which they were already doing with their own weapons and soldiers. The escalation in question is about the use of American weapons, which will likely trigger some kind of (probably not nuclear) response from the Russians, who have the possibility of sending weapons to anti-western militant groups, or to take other actions.

[-] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I’m an anarchist.

So you have no clue.

If you really want to know - when Hamas attacked Israel, I said that Israel has the right to defend itself. When Israel started bombing civilians, created a famine in Gaza and destroyed their infrastructure, I said: that’s no longer self defense.

See, you have absolutely no clue about anything. Just going with the recent thing, no attempt of learning history. This did not start last year. it started over 70 years ago, by what would become the zionist entity. But that seems too long for you to look into, so you rather tell the ones affected by ethnic cleansing and genocide how they should resist. Can't have the brown people make you feel bad, after all!

Just vibes based politics.

There is no "right to defend itself" for occupation forces. There is however the right to resist occupation. Your vibes based analysis lead you to the literal opposite of reality.

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 0 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

So you have no clue.

How many years have you lived in the USSR? I have lived there from 1980 to 1991 - until it fell apart.

How many years have you lived in Eastern Europe? I have lived here all of my life.

I have a pretty good clue. Our discussion environment here is simply populated by people detached - to various degrees - from reality. There's even a guy arguing that North Korea isn't a dictatorship. Facts don't seem to have any weight here. Thus, I don't think I will continue this discussion. Thanks for polite replies.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
140 points (83.7% liked)

news

23567 readers
1149 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS