161

I'm willing to bet money the threats are from their members.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 month ago

"With President Trump as our example, dangerous acts of intimidation and violence will not deter us,” she said.

Is that because they are used to throwing around threats to anyone they disagree with?

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Trump, who survived two assassination attempts during his campaign

I mean his two would be assassins were Republican/Trump supporters after all.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Also they were the world's worst marksmen.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 month ago

If they were legitimate bomb threats the body has ways of shutting that down /s

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

Love how it mentions their children, their ages, and how many they have like we're supposed to feel bad for literal fascists planning on harming all of us.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's ironic since the children would probably be better off, knowing the kind of people they are.

[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 month ago

"If you bomb me, this is how many kids will breathe a sigh of relief"

[-] gassygiant@discuss.online 36 points 1 month ago

Now they’re happy to trust the FBI to investigate. How convenient.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago
[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The article did say that there were also swatting incidents. Those can even result in somebody being killed.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's pretty obvious what he's saying my man. Do you often need basic sentences explained to you?

[-] whithom@discuss.online 25 points 1 month ago

I think you need it explained that they are saying “who gives a shit”

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure you're right. That's why I prefer to use this because there's no misunderstanding.

1000002081

[-] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago

In an alternate universe:

"Why'd he do that?"

"Why wouldn't he?"

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Call me when they start shooting shit up like young conservatives that have been brainwashed.

Trump set the example. Violence will be rewarded.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

Well, I guess Trump is really starting to piss off his true followers. I'm fairly certain that's where the bomb threats are coming from. I know the MAGAts have been bitching about the nomination of at least a couple of these clowns and saying that Trump has betrayed their values.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

"A taste of my own medicine?" Let me play these stochastic terrorists a sad song on the world's smallest violin.

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 month ago
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Good. These people should know no peace.

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah, why aren’t billionaires living in fear yet? Forget these weak-ass politicians!

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

That'll give you an idea of how big the gap really is

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I couldn’t be bothered to care. Fuckem.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Have they tried not eating cats and dogs?

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Bomb threat when it's against a school, bomb treat when it's against fascists.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Incompetent Reichstag fire?

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Bullies will always cry crocodile tears if they get the tiniest taste of their own medicine.

[-] AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They'll get something big enough and it's off to the races.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I’m willing to bet money the threats are from their members.

Their members are not likely to be in any way threatening.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh no...~please.......~~stop.......~

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Couldn't have happened to nicer people.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Here’s for hoping they’re successful.

[-] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Somebody set up us the bomb.

[-] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Probably bored anti-woke gamers.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

They're probably lying as a pretext to introduce martial law.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Oh no... ok.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
161 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19315 readers
2462 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS