this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
247 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

70048 readers
3911 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In short, Bybit was abysmally sloppy with their security.

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How did you reach this conclusion from the article? It seemed for the most part Bybit was following good security practices

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

"For the most part" really doesn't cut it in an industry like this.

[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Some employees though, not so much

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Crypto really is a perfect target for this kind of bank robbery, nobody can really feel too bad about it. It adds nothing to society, since you can't even buy anything with it beside drugs and is mostly used for speculation and creating pollution. Also 99% of it is owned by people who already have enough or too much wealth to begin with.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I personally think there could be practical uses for crypto, such as getting around banking monopolies, but it's poorly secured at the moment, and the main usecase being pushed by its users are "get rich quick" schemes often involving fraud.

[–] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

In a way crypto has fulfilled the promise of "banking the unbanked"... Its just that the main group of ”unbanked” people happened to be criminals and scammers.

Its been a huge boom for scammers, before this you had to convince people to use wester union or something and convince a person they are talking to some inconvenienced soon to be oil barron, now all they do is throw up a website with tradingview charts and people will throw money at them.

[–] TuxEnthusiast@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its the only way to make anonymous payments (XMR) in a world where everything tracks and spies on you. And it's not only used to buy illegal stuff https://kycnot.me/ . I think of it like the TOR browser. Its great for people who are trying to escape an authoritarian government, but it can be used for bad things as well. But it should exist as I believe privacy is a human right.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Okay I get the hate for capitalism and global warming, but can we stop acting like anonymous payments for drugs and web hosting are a bad thing?

Do you like to get stoned and/or to trip balls? Do you like watching pirated movies? I fucking do at least, I imagine most people do lol.

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your thinking seems to assume the liberal society as static and unchanging and seek to make life within it more tolerable, even with things that are mostly just product of current society and it's ills.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well yeah in a better society where art was distributed freely and certain recreational substances weren't illegal we wouldn't need them.

That's not the reality we live in today, however, nor will it be for a very long time, unfortunately.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

In history is funny given crypto is like the most recent possible thing to eist worth stealing at this level. Its like a decade and a half?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What proportion of their GDP is that?

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

$29.6 billion (2023). $1,217 GDP per capita. So about 5.01% of it's GDP.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

GDP isn't a particularly useful measurement when a nation is that sanctioned, but it's a still a pretty hefty cash influx in the exact kind of currency that lets them evade those sanctions.

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

This, flat GDP really only accurately measures US economy and maybe the Euro zone. With others it becomes increasingly useless in really estimating anything concrete about that economy. Doubly so if they are sanctioned.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Internet says gdp of 23.34B so 6ish% of GDP.

[–] Lurkinney@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Payment for the soldiers they sent to the grinder

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 9 points 2 months ago

There's a great podcast called "The Lazarus Heist" that goes into North Korea's activities in stealing huge sums of money. Well worth a listen.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 months ago

Good for them honestly

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago

that's great stuff, that, all north korea had to do was be patient, and be smarter than those who were charged with coding the protection. if you aren't smart enough, or vigilant enough, to protect the asset, it's as good as investing pyrite and funneling your money directly to terrorists.