this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
184 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22164 readers
3306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Who the fuck advocates for de-funding their own public services?

Edit: can't spell

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 minutes ago
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Mini dictators that want to control their slaves...

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did it have a bible again?

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

I mean, have you read Ezekiel 23:20? So raunchy!

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago

When you see “Alabama” and “books” in the same headline, you can pretty much write the rest of the article in your head, and you know it’s gonna be bad.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good! We need to PROTECT the CHILDREN! Not from Measles. Or Bird Flu. Or Daughters Raping Fathers or Fathers Raping Daughters. We need to PROTECT Children from RAINBOWS!

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

Dude, you're gonna get disappeared for typing r@!nb0w5 out where children could conceivably read it, assuming they are allowed to learn how to read in the first place still.

[–] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

You mean "heterosexual color arches?"

[–] PeripheralGhost@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

So now they'll protect everyone from reading....

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Yet another instance of a few conservative political activists ruining good things for the rest of us. People, if this is happening in your communities, you need to be in the streets protesting, flooding the lines of your representatives, and organizing, because they WILL NOT STOP. YOU NEED TO PUSH BACK.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

From now on all libraries are only allowed to carry the bible, "The Art of the Deal" and "Mein Kampf".

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

The Bible contains too many woke messages like the immorality of wealth.

It'd be easier if libraries didn't have any books at all but instead just had a TV running a prosperity gospel televangelist 24/7.

[–] GreyAlien@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Then they sign the "To Aid Tinnitus Effectiveness" act, making it mandatory for schools and libraries to put Tate’s podcast on repeat at maximum volume as a way of "enhancing learning capabilities", if silence feels good it must be woke!

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Otherwise known as the holy trinity of education

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Hell yeah, maybe they’ll burn down their hospitals next

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is with Gen X/Millennial parents wanting to preserve their teens as little children for as long as possible?

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago

Right wing media brainwashing.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The book they mention is "Sold" which has a 9th grade reading level and is intended for people 13+ according to McCormick. So because they didn't move books like that from the Youth section to the adult section, they are defunding them.

Let's get this straight, what does that do? If you move their reading level to the adult sections then they will look for books there... Meaning they will come in contact with books intended for even older audiences. I don't get it.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

13 year olds are not adults, so why would the book be in an adult section anyway?

Of course, all of this is an obvious smokescreen for right wingers lashing out at anything they deem as intolerable.

There will never be a union between the educated and tolerant, and people who align themselves with right-wing authoritarian rhetoric.

Oh I don't think they should move them, but that was what they claimed was their reasoning on the article. They demanded a list of books were moved to the adult section. Which Sold apparently is about a young girl being kidnapped and sold in India, so I can understand why there might be a parent out there that may think it isn't for their child, and other clearly would think that's when they should read it. To me it just means maybe the guardians should be involved in telling their kids why or why not they should check out a book.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Also defunding libraries that protect them next at 11. Parents Might is Parents rights

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Inappropriate books like the Bible?