this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8350 readers
291 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They just get so many things wrong on a fundamental level but they speak with such unearned confidence, and any evidence that goes against their worldview they dismiss out of hand as the result of a sinister conspiracy.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

cw fresh liberal ~~theory~~ braindump:

spoiler

Are those pre-pandemic era prices you are referring to? Yes, things have changed. The pandemic highlighted how restaurants had a fundamentally flawed business model by operating so tightly with such small margins. A healthy business needs to be able to weather bumps in the road like the pandemic, but if you are doing the equivalent of living paycheck to paycheck as a business, that means your prices are too low. The pandemic really highlighted how as restaurant patrons, we were underpaying this entire time. A meaningful portion of the price increase you've seen at restaurants across the board since then has simply been correcting prices to what they should have been this whole time.

It does suck, because we were all used to getting an underpriced meal and and it sucks giving up something we are all so used to but the solution isn't to keep a flawed restaurant business culture where most fail in the first 5 years and most can't handle being shut down for a couple of weeks.the solution is to treat dining out as more of a luxury than we were previously and adapt by cooking more and what have you.

profits are a divine construct

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmm. Where is my eye gouging out fork I never want to read something like that again.

"Careful chief! Any price the market offers is, by definition, fair!"

[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

commiserations, dawg

It does suck, because we were all used to getting an underpriced meal and and it sucks giving up something we are all so used to but the solution isn't to keep a flawed restaurant business culture where most fail in the first 5 years and most can't handle being shut down for a couple of weeks.the solution is to treat dining out as more of a luxury than we were previously and adapt by cooking more and what have you.

Ah yes, nothing says making sure a ton of restaurants don't collapse into bankruptcy like jacking up their prices to the point of being a luxury and suddenly realizing people don't have the disposable income for that.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Funny how this never applies to labor costs.

“You see, porky realized this whole time he was long overdue for a raise! Sorry, you’ll have less stuff because of inflation….wait, don’t ask for a raise because poor porky might have to go without! And we can’t have that!”

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Funny how this never applies to labor costs.

It's infuriating trying to talk to liberals about labor as a commodity because they think everyone is on some PMC salary with benefits, not realizing people really do work minimum wage with no health insurance, vacation days, and so on. I've seen that look of "deer in headlights" too many times when I mention people bargaining for higher wages because of so-called labor shortages and it's maddening.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

"No one actually makes 7.25 an hour!" repeated like gospel truth.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Literally figured this out when I got my first job

[–] miz@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Frank@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Probably search my posts for "American Civic Religion" and variations of that.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] jack@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When Hexbear needed him most, @Frank@hexbear.net vanished

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What? I'm back? What the hell is going on?

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks, man. Your effortposts are some of the best on this site. I'm going to enjoy reading these.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, unlike creationists, their cranks have institutional backing and a non-zero amount of public policy is based on their beliefs

[–] indeed@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

It's absolutely that aspect which then inevitably leads to it also being 'what no theory does to a motherfucker'.

Much like creationists, 99% of liberals don't read about or are misinformed about their beliefs. Ask them about it and it's all "Supply and Demand", "Free Market", and "Human Nature". Just like creationists with their "Science can't disprove", "The Universe and life is too complex for everything to be random", and "God made us this way". They don't read about economics the same way creationists don't even read the Bible, much less learn about science. They just like how their "belief" benefits them feel and being part of their cultural group, fuck anyone else.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem with regulation, such as minimum employee ages, is this secret trick called regulatory capture, which makes it harder for new competitors to show up, and that's because companies are suddenly required to play by rules.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

We can have regulated capitalism indefinitely. There is no falling rate of profit and fascism happens because bigots show up ex nihilo and hypnotize people with their words.

[–] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea, the unearned confidence really irks me. Someone told me homelessness is a function of government spending as if it was a fact and I wanted to shoot myself

[–] SovietyWoomy@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't that technically true for a capitalist government though? Government spending on anticommunist propaganda, support for landlords, and police forces contributes to homelessness.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, but you know they meant it was because welfare makes people lazy and/or having minimum safety standards for structures means housing supply is low

[–] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Yea, as the other commenter said, they meant the opposite

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

The problem with government is that the corrupted will take advantage of the possibility of corruption, therefore we should cut out of the middleman and give the corrupt everything they want for free.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

"Just work harder and the invisible hand will give you a raise!"

— Person who’s never read Adam Smith and thinks invisible hand means magic capitalism fairy that rewards bootlicking.