this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13785 readers
607 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So let me get this straight:

There's a powerful nation coming towards Earth to wipe us all out before we get advanced enough to protect ourselves because they both want what we have and don't want to give us the opportunity to build up, and they also have people here among us who despise the current people in charge and think the foreign invaders will be better for us all.

Additionally even as we live under threat of oncoming invasion, people still want to believe "surely they're not as bad as we think they are; look how advanced they are!"

The only thing that also turns them away finally? We create a mutually assured destruction weapon, and this is what finally stop the invasion and makes the invader behave themselves; meanwhile, people here on Earth are actually really getting into the cultural works of the people who want to invade us; we listen to their music, read their philosophers, watch their movies, etc., and we believe that coexistence with the vastly more powerful foreign nation is entirely possible and things must absolutely be different now, surely.

Of course the most powerful, 'needs to be ready to push the button' person on the planet is now becoming more trusting of this former foe nation and thinks perhaps there really is middle ground between them and doesn't truly want to even be in the position where they'd have to fight back against them, and in that moment of indecisiveness, in that moment of weakness, the foe nation already had the means of our destruction at our doorstep, waiting for a weak 'leader', and starts the war to annihilate us.

Watching this it definitely felt like a dig at American soft power and how the only thing that stops us from invading places like the DPRK are deterrents or MAD weapons, and also how we like to build up treasonous groups who oppose their own countries thinking we're going to be in it for their sakes.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Considering the portrayal of Ye Wenjie as the woman who dooms the world because of the trauma the cultural revolution gave her (meanwhile a woman being too soft is the reason the aliens win later), and that all life in the universe is inherently xenophobic and resource obsessed, I suspect any good politics are accidental

[–] baaaaaaaaaaah@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

trauma the cultural revolution

The modern CPC is also very critical of the Cultural Revolution to be fair.

all life in the universe is inherently xenophobic and resource obsessed

Dark Forest Theory doesn't imply that all life is xenophobic and resource obsessed, just that civilisations have to assume that other civilisations are on the chance that they are. Rolling the dice is potentially existential so you have to assume the worst of everyone, but that doesn't mean everyone is actually the worst.

Absolutely will not argue with you on Liu's gender brainworms though.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dark forest theory kind of sucks though, because all it takes is for a few non-shithead species to openly band together and murder dark forest societies, and the local calculus changes drastically towards federation.

[–] baaaaaaaaaaah@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But how do they band together if they can't communicate? Under Dark Forest potentially-friendly civilisations can't contact each other at all because they can't take the risk of revealing their position to a malicious one.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

right, but all it takes is a few stupidly trusting civs clustered together with no malicious ones nearby, and by the time they encounter one they're the local hegemon, and by the time they're big enough to attract a bigger malicious civ they've encountered dark forest theory and countered it. In fact I'd say the dimensional collapse weapon was first invented as a desperate survival strategy by a dark forest civ against a federation.

The entire novel is kind of predicated on first contact being a jealous civ of assholes who grew up in hellworld, and not, say, The Culture.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

The three body problem is basically written by a 2000s era Chinese upper class liberal nationalist with an extreme anti Maoist kneejerk response. and has the realpoltick ideology of such.

Compare Pantheon by the guy who did the English translation, who is an American liberal but features a very positive portrayal of a committed neo-maoist.

[–] Blep@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem with that reading comes in later books

basically the thesis of the seriesWhere every society is just like that as the default.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I support the abolition of nuclear weapons...

For western countries.

[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Cynicism towards the west is not only well earned, its downright suicidal not to follow through on

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Liu Cixin read realist international relations theory and decided to write a sci-fi book about it. I think you'll naturally get dynamics to look like real life from that.

I think he also has stand ins for Donald Rumsfeld and Osama bin Laden who both make appearances in the second book.

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think Bin Laden in that book is supposed to be the real life Bin Laden (remember that it originally came out in China when he was still alive), unlike everyone else in the book who's a fictional character who may or may not be a stand in for a real person (Rey Diaz probably most obviously being Chavez). His name just isn't outright said for some reason, maybe because he's a real person.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Probably, but no doubt most people watch it and think "alien=immigrants"

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I never saw like that reading the books, but that might be because they're pretty reactionary and the US is portrayed in a relatively positive light.

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

yea pretty much, comrade Kaplya posted a thought experiment on the news mega talking about the book, and its pretty much how chinese liberals see their relations with the USA, which "should China do MAD if they are attacked by a USA nuclear strike?"

most people said yes posadist-nuke

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

I think the trisolarans are meant to be imperial Japan