this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
99 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

18632 readers
47 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm kind of tired of Google sending me to the same 3 sites whenever I search for something. If not the same 3 sites it's 7 others that are so generic and boring I just feel they're useless. It's always makeuseof, androidauthority, or whatever other sites that have useful information but I rarely feel like they are saying anything new.

I want to see the results from those small blogs that are sometimes linked here. I can't come up with one since... you know that's why I'm asking how to find them, but you know them; they talk about nerdy stuff and are not afraid to get technical in whatever topic they discuss.

Also duckduckgo and qwant do the same thing. If there is a way to curate the results to better fit my needs then that'd be great too!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 30 points 2 years ago (9 children)

been using kagi for some weeks and so far I am satisfied. It has a subscription cost after 300 searches though. But I guess getting rid of advertisements and tracking has a price

[–] tombuben@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I've read around their documentation and they have a pretty compelling reason why one should prefer search engines where you directly pay to the search provider instead of relying on third parties such as advertisers to pay for your search usage.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the end, a subscription service ensures your incentives align, even if you need to pay for it.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 6 points 2 years ago

Usually. Other times you end up with Netflix.

[–] fckgwrhqq2yxrkt@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

I save way more than I pay for Kagi because it doesn't give me sponsored results and other garbage trying to make me waste money.

[–] RadioRat@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

It’s been worth it for my spouse and me. Happy to pay for a product rather than being the product.

[–] spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

That actually looks really amazing! I really want more services to actually compel users to pay to support them, and make it a good decision to do so. I think this is the best suggestion so far. Thanks mate!

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

Yes, I tried that and have now got to the susbscribe or move on phase.

Went back to DDG and results really are not in the same league as Kagi so I may just cough up.

[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The search results are good but the limited searches make me anxious for running out. If it grows enough to the point where they can sustain themselves by offering the unlimited tier for $3-5 I might switch but not with the current pricing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Kagi is really good

You need to pay for it but the free search allowance is enough for me.

[–] SamVimes@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

By free search allowance, do you mean the one time trial of 100, the 300 per month if you're paying $5, or something else?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] silentdanni@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Kagi is the only one that consistently gives me much better results than google. The fact that it's not riddled with ads on the first page was a big incentive for me to give them some cash. It actually improved my productivity at work a whole lot. This actually made me think how shitty google has become when I was preferring results given by an error prone AI compared to just searching for it. Now with Kagi, I can actually find the stuff I'm looking for and only use AI in case I can't find it there for some reason. Totally worth the monthly subscription for me.

[–] tiago@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

I hit the threshold in a week, but it was because I got engaging results.

Ideal search engine for falling into unexpected rabbit holes. It's scratches the itch of really exploring the web.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Use a SearXNG instance for free search. Kagi for paid. We've unfortunately hit the point where this is necessary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wintrparkgrl@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I love duck duck go but theres one key thing I've been missing (or don't know how to do) with google you can just throw -word or -"a phrase" and it will ommit any result with them

[–] xc@artemis.camp 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You have to blacklist the AI farm sites though

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How do you that? They've been getting on my last nerve.

[–] sandriver@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Firefox has uBlacklist, might be on Chrome too.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for the recommendation. Looks like it only works with Google text search, and I don't use Google search.

[–] sandriver@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use it with DuckDuckGo and startpage, it can be configured for a few search engines.

Oh wow! Ok! I'll see if it works for me, too. Thanks!

[–] anzo@programming.dev 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm running searxng on docker locally, and set that as my search engine on Firefox. It's been awesome! I will probably start a blog and post instructions... Adding the custom search engine into about:config was kinda difficult. Other web browsers should be easier.. (e.g. Vivaldi)

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You can add search engines to Firefox in the address and search bar.

Go to the site you want to add, click the address bar for the drop down to show, then there will be an icon for that site with a green plus to add it.

If you use the search box it's even easier. If you're on the site the icon on the left will have the green plus symbol for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] forestG@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There was a time before google's search engine, when all the previous attempts had not managed to become the dominant entry point for the web. During that time, we would find interesting web pages through people and/or specific interests. Then, google came, and for a time it was good (read like The Second Renaissance Part I story from animatrix). Ads and SEO were not everywhere yet, content mattered more than those two. So, while I came here to suggest what @bbbhltz@beehaw.org commented, when I read your post text I thought that maybe, at least for what we tend to constantly look for news, articles and discussions, we shouldn't constantly rely on search engines. For example, most technologies have news letters, weekly/monthly magazines, mailing lists, community boards or other forms of group communication through which you can gradually discover better content sources (individuals or groups) on what interests you. Without the search engine service and its cost (direct or indirect) between you and the content.

[–] liv@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

During that time, we would find interesting web pages through people and/or specific interests.

I beg to differ, during that time I found most of my interesting content through AltaVista and its weird cousin HastaLaVista, and aggregators like Portal of Evil (though, bad example, I seem to recall PoE was pretty much the same time as google).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

The map https://www.searchenginemap.com/

You'll see a bunch of them are metasearch engines, and not crawlers

Mojeek, Kagi and variations of SearXNG are good bets. Kagi will allow curation. Mojeek lets you make "Focus" filters. Worth trying out.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Kagi has been working out pretty ok for me. Quality of searches is good. No ads, no promoted listings; it is fee based.

[–] strudel6242@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Happy paying customer here, it's great to see the innovations they're making and their interactions with the community.

[–] lovesyouandhugsyou@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

I too am a happy customer. The ability to tweak individual site ranking especially makes searching the internet so useful again.

[–] reka@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

If you're a programmer, might I suggest the brave new world of ChatGPT enhanced search via Phind.com

Even if you're not, it's fantastic. It basically takes your input and processes it like ChatGPT but then is trained to run web searches to grab further information and uses that to progress its own internal monologue. The result is a natural language response with search engine like results down the side which are cited within the main response.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sculd@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Qwant

Try it. It has pretty good results even outside the US and is much more private.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Have you tried https://duckduckgo.com/ . I've used them a very long time. I do not use Google search.

[–] spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I tried it but unfortunately it's very similar to Google search just without the trackers, and sometimes the results are a bit worse (worth it for not having the trackers though)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

DDG just uses Google's search engine, minus all the trackers.

[–] reka@beehaw.org 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Where did you hear this? This isn't true. If you want google without the tracking, use StartPage (if you're using DDG this can be accessed with the !sp bang preface)

DDG uses Bing as their fallback engine but also does a lot of propitiatory indexing of its own

https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/

[–] emma@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"propitiatory indexing" is a delightful autocorrect :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry, I must've mixed up Start Page and DDG and/or Google and Bing. Though wasn't aware that they did that much indexing of their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] amphetaminisiert@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago

I've been using qwant for a while now and I think it's nice

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago

There's no such good search engine. I do all my using bangs (duckduckgo terminolgy) or whatever its called on brave and others but maily brave.The reason I use brave is that because they dont pull results from google and bing.

[–] odium@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe try stract, try out the different optics it has. My favorite is the discussions optic. Lots of lemmy/kbin results with that. Hacker news optic might be closer to what you're looking for.

[–] Spudger 3 points 2 years ago

One of the problems I have with search engines when looking for tech solutions is that the results are incredibly out of date. I don't bother any more and just go straight to the product's own support forum. Where possible I add the forum's own search entry to Firefox's search box. At least I no longer get answers to a problem no one has had since 2018.

[–] Tin@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I did Startpage, then self-hosted searx for a while, then switched back to Startpage, and recently subscribed to Kagi, which I very much enjoy. I do not mind paying a provider for search built with the user in mind rather than their advertisers.

load more comments
view more: next ›