this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38611 readers
465 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The DOJ wants to bar Google from paying to be the default search engine in third-party browsers including Firefox, among a long list of other proposals including a forced sale of Google’s own Chrome browser and requiring it to syndicate search results to rivals. The court has already ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly in search, partly thanks to exclusionary deals that make it the default engine on browsers and phones, depriving rivals of places to distribute their search engines and scale up. But while Firefox — whose CFO is testifying as Google presents its defense — competes directly with Chrome, it warns that losing the lucrative default payments from Google could threaten its existence.

Firefox makes up about 90 percent of Mozilla’s revenue, according to Muhlheim, the finance chief for the organization’s for-profit arm — which in turn helps fund the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation. About 85 percent of that revenue comes from its deal with Google, he added.

Losing that revenue all at once would mean Mozilla would have to make “significant cuts across the company,” Muhlheim testified, and warned of a “downward spiral” that could happen if the company had to scale back product engineering investments in Firefox, making it less attractive to users. That kind of spiral, he said, could “put Firefox out of business.” That could also mean less money for nonprofit efforts like open source web tools and an assessment of how AI can help fight climate change.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The mozilla foundation needs to be gutted or dissolved. Why do you need so much money? Oh, is it maybe because your fucking execs gobble it all up while the devs scrounge for scraps and the community contributes for free to your projects, you fucking executive pigs?

I hope it crashes and burns. I would bet serious money that the softare projects would not only survive but thrive without them.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you actually had a look at their actual numbers, they're a charity you know, they're public, you'd see that the bulk of money is spent on charity. Mozilla has never been a charity to develop Firefox, Firefox has always been the breadwinner for Mozilla's charity operations.

[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I did, i abso-fucking-lutely did look at their numbers.

The 2024 numbers are not fully in, we can take a look at 2023. here is a link for you to follow along - https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2024/mozilla-fdn-2023-fs-final-short-1209.pdf

I am skipping the income part, because its clear where they get the vast majority of their money.

[in millions, rounded up] Total revenue: $653

From which expenditures:

  • Program staff: $202.4

  • Management: $123.4

  • Fundraising: $2.4

  • Non-salary expenses: $162.2

  • Grants and fellowships: $6.4

  • Income tax: $14.4

Total expenditure: $511.1

So when you say "the bulk of money is spent on charity", do you mean salaries? Because from what I can see, that is where the "bulk" is.

The charity part, from the 2023 revenue is 1%.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I was talking about the foundation itself, not foundation+subsidiaries. And yes ever since the writing was on the wall wrt. google funds they've been putting more and more money in investments to make sure they can survive, as opposed to grants. Still keeping with the foundation's mandate, though, e.g. all their VC investments into AI are the polar opposite of what the likes of OpenAI are doing. Kinda sceptical e.g. huggingface will ever turn a profit, much less a significant one, but it's important to have them.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 81 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reduce exec pay to normal levels.
Funnel most of the funds to the Firefox department.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stop acting like a tech start-up and become a worker owned co-op instead.

Allow people to give to firefox directly, like they do with thunderbird.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Sure, why not

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 43 points 3 days ago (2 children)

'Your honor, we urge you to allow this company to continue breaking the law because our business is insolvent without the revenue we earn from crimes.'

I like Firefox, but if enforcing antitrust collapses Mozilla than so be it. How long has this car been going on? Have they not established any plans for what they'd do if this happened? They derive 75% of their whole company revenue from one source that was likely to be found illegal? They really thought that was a good idea? That's a hell of a business model. It's not a judge's job to save them from that.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 15 points 2 days ago

Yeah, they really should have allowed us to give to firefox directly a long time ago. Why they don't is beyond me considering they do with thunderbird.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

Firefox: "But I'm nothing without Google money"

FOSS community: "If you're nothing without Google money, then you don't deserve it."

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Sue Google for damage from it's monopoly. There's your money right there.

[–] irvinefantasyno@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

I like the way you think!

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago

Mozilla executives are once again carrying water for Google.

If there is any doubt who they work for, watching them testify in defense of Google's monopoly should be all you need.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Every nation in the world should fund open source technologies with a large chunk of their tax revenue. The fact that this isn’t even close to happening almost everywhere says all we need to know about world governments and their corporatist nature.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

This is what I came here to say. This is a sovereignty issue they could solve with a miniscule portion of their defense budgets.

[–] RDAM_Whiskers@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

I stopped using Google as my default search engine year's ago in favor of duck

The day the browser comes back to the Mozilla foundation, you'll realise you don't fucking need Google.

We the community, are waiting for the moment we can invest on our (currently) only chance to truly fuck with Google.

[–] beejjorgensen 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How much does Firefox development cost? The Mozilla Foundation itself has a dearth of friends even among hackers. But Firefox is worth preserving. Could we get enough paying supporters to continue development?

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 20 points 2 days ago

If they allowed us to give to firefox directly, maybe. Personally we think it is likely that mozilla badly needs to become a worker owned co-op so that CEOs stop taking so much.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

Sure. I mean, I'm not going to stop using it, and people will make forks for eternity, but the average joe might switch... However, the average joe supports Nazis these days, so I don't really give a shit about what the majority are doing.

Wouldn't other search engines be happy to make the same deal? Maybe they wouldn't pay as much as google but it wouldn't be as catastrophic as implied.