Yes, yes you should.
Hell, I unplug the damned thing when I'm not using it.
this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
134 points (98.6% liked)
Privacy
2176 readers
300 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
Yes. Technically everything is hackable.
Have there ever been cases where this actually happened?
Yes, several schools have been caught activating cameras in the home, and have punished students for activities seen on those illegally enabled cameras
Nothing happened to the schools
Spying trough the webcam?
Hell yeah. There's even sellers on hacker forums that sell access to the computers of hot girls. It's sick but it happens.
Most big time hackers don't do this though. They'll have so many computers under their control they don't waste time on singular targets.
Can you provide any sources?
This was over 10 years ago, but it popped into my head as soon as I saw this thread. Over 1,600 rent-to-own stores were found by the FTC to have spyware installed on laptops that enabled the stores to access the webcams. The spyware also included keyloggers.
I would bet money that this type of shit still happens.
Can you cover the lens with sandpaper and rub it for a few minutes? Permanent problems require permanent solutions
This is the energy I’m looking for. Impractical but powerful.
Most people would like to use the webcam occasionally though.
Chapstick + Webcam + Twist Chapstick on Lens + "The camera looks like that even when I clean it" = Problem Solved
Yea that's just great when I'm needing to do a virtual job interview. Really professional.
Chapstick is removable...
EFF gives out tiny stickers at conventions for that purpose. I've been staring at an EFF sticker for years.
Absolutely, unless you're lucky enough to have a laptop with a Physical killswitch on your Webcam + Mic module, then it's not needed since flipping the Switch physically kills power to the Camera module's USB header.
Framework Laptops have this Feature.
My Asus has one and I didn't know about it and FOR YEARS I thought my webcam was broken- it wasn't even showing up in the device manager. I bought an external webcam, because I figured it was pooched and I had to use a webcam sometimes, but not often enough to care into looking to get it repaired.
This is a story about me being dumb.
Maybe that's why many PCs these days don't have them, and also why they don't have network kill-switches anymore. People just got confused and thought something was broken.
I'm glad I'm not the only one. I've since been issued new laptops for work that have physical covers built in and I'm a big fan of those, though I know it doesn't disable a mic.
load more comments
(3 replies)
More importantly, run an operating system you can trust.
No operating system is trustable unless you coded it entirely yourself on an air gapped machine with your own hand crafted compiler, and even then you are still exposed to hardware backdoors
I have Linux Mint installed on my laptop, I just don't trust M$ Windows with their AI crap.
another cultist
load more comments
(13 replies)
Cover all cameras on all devices.
Related, when we were shopping for a smart TV last year, it was so difficult to find one without a microphone... I already don't like my phone having a microphone, why would I put it into my bloody TV...
I already don’t like my phone having a microphone
A phone without a microphone. A phone... without a microphone... is not a phone.
Can I ask what you use a phone for?
Classic missing the thread deliberately for internet clout
What about my cameras?
Zuckerberg has been doing this for over a decade.
https://mashable.com/article/mark-zuckerberg-webcam-cover
The answer is yes, obviously duh, yes.
TL;DR
Yes
Also disable all microphones etc. of course
Fun fact, every speaker is a microphone and vice versa.
While true, an average speaker isn't sensitive enough to get quality or understandable sound out of, and that's assuming software can be rewritten to accept input from them.
This isn't a realistic privacy concern imo, but it is a novel fun fact, and if you have a 3.5mm jack you can play around with it on a PC
load more comments
(3 replies)
My Thinkpad has a built-in camera cover. I keep it closed unless I'm specifically using it.
Thinkpads are great that way
load more comments
(1 replies)
I have a cheap garbage windows work laptop without a cover. So I just put a clothesline clip on it at all times.
One of the benefits of using a desktop PC instead of a laptop xd
(Tbh if I had a laptop I would surely cover it up. Not going to trust software with this...)
Oh yeah. Use electrical tape.
My framework laptop has a built-in, physical kill switch for both the webcam and mic.
On my desktop pc, I cover the webcam or unplug it entirely until I need it.
Yeah I use a desktop PC, and like once every 2 weeks I plug in my webcam for a work meeting, the rest of the time I bask in the comfort that my PC has no visual/audio sensors 😌
I have a 15+ year old lamp on my desk which has a bulb that gets quite hot. Didn't realize my laptop was directly under it one day. Melted the laptop lid slightly directly where the camera is located.
Everything else works fine except for the camera. I always disabled it in BIOS but now it's physically disabled. Sometimes the adhd solves problems on it's own.
I learned the other day my laptop doesn’t even have a camera. I’ve never noticed in the six months of owning it.
Excellent.
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›